Tao Ningning, Chen Xiaosong, Xie Fei, Zhang Yongwen, Xia Yan, Ma Xuan, Huang Han, Wang Hongyu
School of Systems Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China.
Institute for Advanced Study in Physics and School of Physics, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Entropy (Basel). 2025 Mar 21;27(4):327. doi: 10.3390/e27040327.
Variations in stratospheric atmospheric circulation significantly impact tropospheric weather and climate. Understanding these variations not only aids in better prediction of tropospheric weather and climate but also provides guidance for the development and flight trajectories of stratospheric aircraft. Our understanding of the stratosphere has made remarkable progress over the past 100 years. However, we still lack a comprehensive perspective on large-scale patterns in stratospheric circulation, as the stratosphere is a typical complex system. To address this gap, we employed the eigen microstate approach (EMA) to revisit the characteristics of zonal wind from 70-10 hPa from 1980 to 2022, based on ERA5 reanalysis data. Our analysis focused on the three leading modes, corresponding to variations in the strength of the quasi-biennial oscillation (QBO) and the stratospheric atmospheric circulations in the Arctic and Antarctic, respectively. After filtering out high-frequency components from the temporal evolutions of these modes, a significant 11-year cycle was observed in the Antarctic stratospheric atmospheric circulation mode, potentially linked to the 11-year solar cycle. In contrast, the Arctic stratospheric atmospheric circulation mode showed a 5-6-year cycle without evidence of an 11-year periodicity. This difference is likely due to the timing of polar vortex breakdowns: the Antarctic polar vortex breaks up later, experiencing its greatest variability in late spring and early summer, making it more susceptible to solar radiation effects, unlike the Arctic polar vortex, which peaks in winter and early spring. The fourth mode exhibits characteristics of a Southern Hemisphere dipole and shows a significant correlation with the Antarctic stratospheric atmospheric circulation mode, leading it by about two months. We designed a linear prediction model that successfully demonstrated its predictive capability for the Antarctic polar vortex.
平流层大气环流的变化对对流层天气和气候有显著影响。了解这些变化不仅有助于更好地预测对流层天气和气候,还为平流层飞机的发展和飞行轨迹提供指导。在过去的100年里,我们对平流层的理解取得了显著进展。然而,由于平流层是一个典型的复杂系统,我们仍然缺乏对平流层环流大尺度模式的全面认识。为了填补这一空白,我们采用本征微状态方法(EMA),基于ERA5再分析数据,重新审视了1980年至2022年70 - 10百帕纬向风的特征。我们的分析集中在三种主导模式上,分别对应准两年振荡(QBO)强度的变化以及北极和南极的平流层大气环流。在从这些模式的时间演变中滤除高频成分后,在南极平流层大气环流模式中观测到一个显著的11年周期,这可能与11年太阳周期有关。相比之下,北极平流层大气环流模式显示出5 - 6年的周期,没有11年周期性的证据。这种差异可能是由于极地涡旋破裂的时间:南极极地涡旋破裂较晚,在晚春和初夏经历最大变化,使其更容易受到太阳辐射影响,而北极极地涡旋在冬季和早春达到峰值。第四种模式表现出南半球偶极子的特征,与南极平流层大气环流模式有显著相关性,领先约两个月。我们设计了一个线性预测模型,成功展示了其对南极极地涡旋的预测能力。