Kasradze David, Kubilius Ričardas
Department of Maxillofacial Surgery, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, 50161 Kaunas, Lithuania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 28;61(4):617. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040617.
: Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery (sCAIS) can be performed with different drill guiding systems. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of two guiding concepts of sCAIS in partially edentulous cases. : Forty polyamide models of partially edentulous maxillae with seven implantation sites were fabricated. In total, 140 replica implants were placed with keyless (KL) and drill-key (DK) guiding systems using static, full-arch, tooth-supported surgical guides. Three-dimensional crestal and apical, angular and vertical deviations from the planned implant positions were compared using Mann-Whitney U and Kruskal-Wallis H tests. Intergroup homogeneity of variance homogeneity was examined using Levene's test to assess the precision. : Overall median 3D crestal and apical deviations of implants placed in the KL group were significantly higher compared to the DK group (0.86 mm [0.63-0.98] vs. 0.72 mm [0.52-0.89], = 0.006 and 1.26 [0.98-1.52] vs. 1.13 [0.70-1.45], = 0.012). In the subgroup analysis, implants placed with a KL system showed higher 3D crestal ( = 0.029), 3D apical ( < 0.001) and angular ( < 0.001) deviations in the extended anterior area, higher 3D crestal ( < 0.001) deviations in the proximal posterior single-tooth gap and higher vertical ( < 0.001) deviations in the distal site of free-end situation. Contrarily, the KL group showed lower 3D crestal ( = 0.007), 3D apical ( < 0.001), angular ( < 0.001) and vertical ( = 0.003) deviations in the distal posterior single-tooth gap, lower 3D apical ( = 0.007) and angular ( = 0.007) deviations in the distal site of free-end situation and lower vertical ( = 0.019) deviations in the proximal site of free-end situation. : The deviations of both guiding concepts did not exceed the recommended safety margins. Statistically significant differences in deviations were found between two guiding concepts. Guiding concepts with superior accuracy varied across different sites of implantation.
静态计算机辅助种植手术(sCAIS)可使用不同的钻孔导向系统进行。本研究旨在比较部分牙列缺损病例中sCAIS两种导向概念的准确性。:制作了40个具有7个种植位点的部分牙列缺损上颌骨的聚酰胺模型。总共使用静态全牙弓牙齿支持的手术导板,通过无钥匙(KL)和钻钥匙(DK)导向系统植入了140颗复制种植体。使用Mann-Whitney U检验和Kruskal-Wallis H检验比较种植体相对于计划种植位置的三维嵴顶和根尖、角度和垂直偏差。使用Levene检验检查组间方差同质性,以评估精度。:与DK组相比,KL组植入种植体的总体三维嵴顶和根尖偏差中位数显著更高(0.86mm[0.63 - 0.98]对0.72mm[0.52 - 0.89],P = 0.006;1.26[0.98 - 1.52]对1.13[0.70 - 1.45],P = 0.012)。在亚组分析中,使用KL系统植入的种植体在扩展前牙区显示出更高的三维嵴顶(P = 0.029)、三维根尖(P < 0.001)和角度(P < 0.001)偏差,在近中后单牙间隙显示出更高的三维嵴顶(P < 0.001)偏差,在游离端情况的远中位点显示出更高的垂直(P < 0.001)偏差。相反,KL组在远中后单牙间隙的三维嵴顶(P = 0.007)、三维根尖(P < 0.001)、角度(P < 0.001)和垂直(P = 0.003)偏差更低,在游离端情况的远中位点的三维根尖(P = 0.007)和角度(P = 0.007)偏差更低,在游离端情况的近中位点的垂直(P = 0.019)偏差更低。:两种导向概念的偏差均未超过推荐的安全 margins。两种导向概念之间在偏差上存在统计学显著差异。具有更高准确性的导向概念在不同种植位点有所不同。