Maracineanu Raluca, Tudor Anca, Hum Ivona, Urtila Florin, Streian Felicia, Talpos-Niculescu Serban, Motoc Marilena
Doctoral School, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300062 Timisoara, Romania.
Department of Functional Sciences, "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 28;61(4):625. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040625.
: Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) was first recognized as a disease entity and reported in the literature in 2003. Within a few years, the incidence of MRONJ has increased significantly, to the point where now it can be seen in every dental clinic around the world. Its prevention and management still remain major challenges for dentists and oral and maxillofacial surgeons. : This prospective clinical study was conducted at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic in Timisoara for a 6-month period and included a total of 85 patients under chronic antiresorptive and antiangiogenic medication. There were two groups of patients: G1 received PRF growth factors, while the other group, G2, was treated with classical surgical methods. Post-operative wound healing was assessed at 2, 4, and 8 weeks by monitoring the absence of local gingival dehiscence, suprainfection, or loco-regional fistulas, both in cases of dental extractions and sequestrectomies in MRONJ cases. The use of PRF in post-extraction sockets in patients predisposed to developing MRONJ aids in local healing in 96% of cases, compared to cases where it was not used, in which normal healing occurred in only 64.29% of patients; there was a significant difference between the two groups ( = 0.016). In MRONJ confirmed cases, application of PRF after excisional debridement of necrotic bone does not appear to have the same therapeutic value as in post-extractional sockets, with a -value of 0.299 indicating no statistical significance. : PRF use can be considered an effective approach in preventing osteonecrotic complications following dental extractions in patients with antiresorptive treatment. Additional studies are needed to establish its role in MRONJ confirmed cases.
颌骨药物性骨坏死(MRONJ)于2003年首次被确认为一种疾病实体并在文献中报道。几年内,MRONJ的发病率显著上升,如今在世界各地的每个牙科诊所都能见到。其预防和治疗仍然是牙医及口腔颌面外科医生面临的重大挑战。
这项前瞻性临床研究在蒂米什瓦拉的口腔颌面外科诊所进行,为期6个月,共纳入85例接受慢性抗吸收和抗血管生成药物治疗的患者。患者分为两组:G1组接受富血小板纤维蛋白(PRF)生长因子治疗,另一组G2组采用传统手术方法治疗。通过监测拔牙及MRONJ病例死骨切除术时局部牙龈裂开、继发感染或局部瘘管的情况,在术后2周、4周和8周评估伤口愈合情况。对于易发生MRONJ的患者,在拔牙创中使用PRF,96%的病例有助于局部愈合,而未使用PRF的病例中,只有64.29%的患者实现正常愈合;两组之间存在显著差异(P = 0.016)。在确诊的MRONJ病例中,坏死骨切除清创术后应用PRF似乎没有与拔牙创中相同的治疗价值,P值为0.299表明无统计学意义。
在接受抗吸收治疗的患者拔牙后,使用PRF可被视为预防骨坏死并发症的有效方法。需要进一步研究以确定其在确诊的MRONJ病例中的作用。