Trache Dragoș, Șerbănoiu Liviu Ionuț, Bistriceanu Mircea Ioan Alexandru, Olteanu Gabriel, Andronic Octavian, Călin Liviu, Busnatu Ștefan-Sebastian
Bagdasar-Arseni Clinical Emergency Hospital, 041915 Bucharest, Romania.
Department of Cardio-Thoracic Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Mar 30;61(4):635. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040635.
This narrative review aims to evaluate the current evidence on the use of cardiac telerehabilitation (CTR) in patients after myocardial infarction, focusing on the effectiveness of e-learning platforms and remote monitoring for addressing cardiovascular risk factors, improving physical fitness, and enhancing patient adherence. The review also explores the limitations and gaps in the literature, highlighting the need for future research to optimize CTR approaches. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed and Scopus, focusing on specific keywords. The search yielded fifteen randomized controlled trials. Data from these studies were analyzed to evaluate the methodology, interventions, patient characteristics, and outcomes related to the use of CTR in managing cardiovascular risk factors and improving physical fitness. The included studies demonstrated that CTR interventions, delivered via online platforms, phone calls, and smart devices, were effective in improving cardiovascular risk factors, physical activity levels, and overall patient satisfaction. CTR appears to be associated with improvements in exercise tolerance, VO max, body composition, and adherence. While the outcomes were promising, there is still limited evidence regarding the long-term impact of CTR on cardiovascular risk factors and lifestyle interventions, particularly in non-exercise components like dietary management and psychological support. Cardiac telerehabilitation presents a feasible and effective alternative to traditional in-hospital rehabilitation programs for patients recovering from myocardial infarction. The integration of e-learning platforms and smart devices enhances patient adherence, improves cardiovascular risk factors, and increases access to rehabilitation services, particularly for those who face barriers to traditional care. However, further large-scale studies are needed to establish standardized protocols and best practices for CTR. Additionally, future research should address disparities in access to digital health technologies, especially among rural and underserved populations, to ensure equitable access to these innovative approaches.
本叙述性综述旨在评估目前关于心肌梗死后患者使用心脏远程康复(CTR)的证据,重点关注电子学习平台和远程监测在解决心血管危险因素、改善身体素质以及提高患者依从性方面的有效性。该综述还探讨了文献中的局限性和差距,强调未来研究优化CTR方法的必要性。使用PubMed和Scopus进行了全面的文献检索,重点关注特定关键词。检索得到15项随机对照试验。对这些研究的数据进行分析,以评估与使用CTR管理心血管危险因素和改善身体素质相关的方法、干预措施、患者特征和结果。纳入的研究表明,通过在线平台、电话和智能设备提供的CTR干预措施在改善心血管危险因素、身体活动水平和患者总体满意度方面是有效的。CTR似乎与运动耐力、最大摄氧量、身体成分和依从性的改善有关。虽然结果很有前景,但关于CTR对心血管危险因素和生活方式干预的长期影响,尤其是在饮食管理和心理支持等非运动方面,仍有有限的证据。对于心肌梗死后康复的患者,心脏远程康复是传统院内康复项目的一种可行且有效的替代方案。电子学习平台和智能设备的整合提高了患者的依从性,改善了心血管危险因素,并增加了康复服务的可及性,特别是对于那些面临传统护理障碍的患者。然而,需要进一步的大规模研究来建立CTR的标准化方案和最佳实践。此外,未来的研究应解决数字健康技术获取方面的差异,特别是在农村和服务不足人群中,以确保公平获得这些创新方法。