Sukati Suriyan, Rattanatham Rujikorn, Masangkay Frederick Ramirez, Tseng Ching-Ping, Kotepui Manas
Medical Technology, School of Allied Health Sciences, Walailak University, Tha Sala, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
Hematology and Transfusion Science Research Center, Walailak University, Tha Sala, Nakhon Si Thammarat 80160, Thailand.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Apr 21;61(4):767. doi: 10.3390/medicina61040767.
: Elevated von Willebrand factor (vWF) levels have been reported in malaria, but their relationship with disease severity remains unclear. This study aimed to compare vWF levels between -infected and uninfected individuals and assess changes in severe infections. : The systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024558479). A comprehensive search across six databases identified studies reporting vWF levels in malaria. A meta-analysis was conducted using a random-effects model, with standardized mean difference (SMD) as the effect measure due to varying measurement units. Heterogeneity was assessed using the statistic. : Of 1647 identified records, 26 studies met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis showed significantly higher vWF levels in -infected individuals compared to uninfected controls ( < 0.001, SMD: 2.689 [95% CI 1.362; 4.017], : 98.1%, 12 studies, 3109 participants). However, no significant difference was found between severe and less severe cases ( = 0.051, SMD: 3.551 [95% CI -0.007; 7.109], : 99.3%, 8 studies, 1453 participants). : vWF levels are significantly elevated in individuals with infections, indicating a potential role in malaria pathophysiology. Although levels tend to be higher in severe cases, current evidence is insufficient to support vWF as a reliable marker for disease severity. Further prospective and well-controlled studies are needed to validate its diagnostic and prognostic value in malaria management.
: 已有报道称疟疾患者血管性血友病因子(vWF)水平升高,但其与疾病严重程度的关系仍不明确。本研究旨在比较感染与未感染个体的vWF水平,并评估重症感染时的变化情况。: 该系统评价已在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO,注册号:CRD42024558479)登记。通过对六个数据库进行全面检索,确定了报告疟疾患者vWF水平的研究。由于测量单位不同,采用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,以标准化均值差(SMD)作为效应量。使用I²统计量评估异质性。: 在1647条检索到的记录中,26项研究符合纳入标准。荟萃分析显示,与未感染对照组相比,感染个体的vWF水平显著更高(P<0.001,SMD:2.689 [95%CI 1.362;4.017],I²:98.1%,12项研究,3109名参与者)。然而,重症与非重症病例之间未发现显著差异(P = 0.051,SMD:3.551 [95%CI -0.007;7.109],I²:99.3%,8项研究,1453名参与者)。: 感染个体的vWF水平显著升高,表明其在疟疾病理生理学中可能发挥作用。尽管重症病例中的水平往往更高,但目前的证据不足以支持将vWF作为疾病严重程度的可靠标志物。需要进一步开展前瞻性且严格对照的研究,以验证其在疟疾管理中的诊断和预后价值。