• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

塞尔维亚一家三级护理医院中罗布森分类法实施情况的回顾性分析

A Retrospective Analysis of the Robson Classification Implementation in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Serbia.

作者信息

Jankovic Svetlana, Rovcanin Marija, Tomic Ana, Jokic Aleksa, Kostic Konstantin, Grujic Tijana, Orlic Natasa Karadzov

机构信息

Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Narodni Front, Kraljice Natalije 62, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Dr Subotica Starijeg 8, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2700. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082700.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14082700
PMID:40283530
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12027955/
Abstract

: Cesarean section (CS) is an essential intervention in obstetric care, significantly contributing to reducing the rate of maternal and neonatal mortality and morbidity. It has been recommended that the acceptable CS rate should not go beyond 10-15% across all deliveries. Nonetheless, the CS rate has escalated over the past decades. To understand the factors contributing to the rise in CS rates, the Robson classification that relies on pre-labor, intrapartum, and postpartum parameters has been proposed. As no journal-reported data are currently available on the implementation of the Robson classification in Serbia, we aimed to identify trends in CS rates, as well as the Robson groups with the highest risk for CS at our tertiary care clinic. : We conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of 6574 women who gave birth to live fetuses weighing a minimum of 500 g and with a gestational age of at least 22 weeks. : The overall CS rate was 30.5%, with a statistically significant difference in CS rates between different Robson groups ( = 2703.9, < 0.001). Robson groups 1 (31.9%), 3 (30.4%), and 5 (10.3%) were the largest, and groups 9 (0.9%) and 7 (1.3%) were the smallest. The CS rate in group 5 was the highest (30.3%), followed by groups 1 (20.3%) and 2 (13.2%). Group 5 was the largest contributor to the absolute CS rate (9.25%), followed by groups 1 (6.21%) and 2 (4.03%). : We effectively implemented Robson classification for monitoring CS rates and distinguishing specific groups that individually contribute to these rates.

摘要

剖宫产是产科护理中的一项重要干预措施,对降低孕产妇和新生儿的死亡率及发病率有显著贡献。建议所有分娩的剖宫产率不应超过10%-15%。尽管如此,在过去几十年中剖宫产率仍在上升。为了解导致剖宫产率上升的因素,有人提出了基于产程前、产程中和产后参数的罗布森分类法。由于目前尚无塞尔维亚实施罗布森分类法的期刊报道数据,我们旨在确定剖宫产率的趋势,以及我们三级护理诊所中剖宫产风险最高的罗布森组。:我们对6574名分娩出至少500克活胎儿且孕周至少22周的妇女进行了回顾性横断面分析。:总体剖宫产率为30.5%,不同罗布森组之间的剖宫产率存在统计学显著差异(=2703.9,<0.001)。罗布森组1(31.9%)、3(30.4%)和5(10.3%)人数最多,组9(0.9%)和7(1.3%)人数最少。组5的剖宫产率最高(30.3%),其次是组1(20.3%)和组2(13.2%)。组5对绝对剖宫产率的贡献最大(9.25%),其次是组1(6.21%)和组2(4.03%)。:我们有效地实施了罗布森分类法来监测剖宫产率,并区分对这些比率有单独贡献的特定组。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd45/12027955/96efc1a554bf/jcm-14-02700-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd45/12027955/96efc1a554bf/jcm-14-02700-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd45/12027955/96efc1a554bf/jcm-14-02700-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
A Retrospective Analysis of the Robson Classification Implementation in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Serbia.塞尔维亚一家三级护理医院中罗布森分类法实施情况的回顾性分析
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 15;14(8):2700. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082700.
2
An Analysis of the Mode of Delivery, Risk Factors, and Subgroups with High Caesarean Birth Rates Using Robson Classification System.应用罗伯逊分类系统分析分娩方式、危险因素和剖宫产率较高的亚组。
Matern Child Health J. 2024 Apr;28(4):667-678. doi: 10.1007/s10995-023-03783-5. Epub 2023 Oct 15.
3
A step towards better audit: The Robson Ten Group classification system for outcomes other than cesarean section.迈向更好的审计:除剖宫产外的其他结局的 Robson Ten 分组分类系统。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2022 Jul;101(7):827-835. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14350. Epub 2022 Mar 16.
4
Analysis of cesarean section rates using Robson ten group classification system in a tertiary teaching hospital, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.采用罗伯逊十组分类系统对埃塞俄比亚亚的斯亚贝巴一所三级教学医院剖宫产率的分析:一项横断面研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020 Dec 9;20(1):767. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03474-x.
5
Study of Caesarean Section Births in a Tertiary Care Hospital in Mumbai Using Robson Classification System.使用罗布森分类系统对孟买一家三级护理医院剖宫产分娩情况的研究
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2023 Dec;73(6):496-503. doi: 10.1007/s13224-023-01851-y. Epub 2023 Oct 10.
6
Cesarean delivery in Iran: a population-based analysis using the Robson classification system.伊朗的剖宫产术:基于人群的应用 Robson 分类系统分析。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2022 Mar 8;22(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-04517-1.
7
Cesarean section in Suriname using robson classification: a two-year nationwide cross-sectional study on rates, risk factors and perinatal outcomes of cesarean section.苏里南剖宫产的罗布森分类法:一项关于剖宫产率、危险因素及围产期结局的为期两年的全国性横断面研究
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025 Jan 20;25(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-07009-6.
8
The Rates of Cesarean Section Deliveries According to Robson Classification System During the Year of 2018 Among Patients in King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.2018年沙特阿拉伯吉达阿卜杜勒-阿齐兹国王医疗城患者中剖宫产分娩率按罗布森分类系统统计情况
Cureus. 2020 Nov 17;12(11):e11529. doi: 10.7759/cureus.11529.
9
Robson classification of caesarean births: implications for reducing caesarean section rate in a private tertiary hospital in Nigeria.剖宫产的罗布森分类:对尼日利亚一家私立三级医院降低剖宫产率的影响
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Apr 12;23(1):243. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05557-x.
10
The Project Appropriate Birth and a reduction in caesarean section rates: an analysis using the Robson classification system.项目适宜分娩和剖宫产率降低:应用罗伯逊分类系统进行的分析。
BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(1):72-80. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16919. Epub 2021 Oct 12.

本文引用的文献

1
Socioeconomic and geographical inequalities in delivery by cesarean section among women in Bangladesh, 2004-2017.2004-2017 年孟加拉国女性剖宫产的社会经济和地理不平等。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024 Feb 13;24(1):131. doi: 10.1186/s12884-024-06327-z.
2
Applying the Modified Ten-Group Robson Classification in a Spanish Tertiary Hospital.在一家西班牙三级医院应用改良的十组罗布森分类法。
J Clin Med. 2023 Dec 31;13(1):252. doi: 10.3390/jcm13010252.
3
Head circumference, as predictor of cephalopelvic disproportion: A prospective analysis of cases of spontaneous vaginal delivery and caesarean section in Ekiti State, Nigeria.
头围作为头盆不称的预测指标:尼日利亚埃基提州阴道自然分娩和剖宫产病例的前瞻性分析。
Afr J Reprod Health. 2023 Jun;27(6s):154-159. doi: 10.29063/ajrh2023/v27i6s.18.
4
Cesarean sections and early-term births according to Robson classification: a population-based study with more than 17 million births in Brazil.根据罗伯逊分类的剖宫产术和早期分娩:巴西一项基于人群的超过 1700 万例分娩的研究。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Aug 3;23(1):562. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05807-y.
5
Global increased cesarean section rates and public health implications: A call to action.全球剖宫产率上升及其对公共卫生的影响:行动呼吁。
Health Sci Rep. 2023 May 18;6(5):e1274. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.1274. eCollection 2023 May.
6
Global inequities in cesarean section deliveries and required resources persist.全球剖宫产分娩和所需资源的不平等现象仍然存在。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2023 Jun;285:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.03.036. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
7
Implementation of the Robson Classification in Greece: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.希腊Robson分类法的实施:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Mar 21;11(6):908. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11060908.
8
Long-term effects of caesarean delivery on health and behavioural outcomes of the mother and child in Bangladesh.在孟加拉国,剖宫产对母婴健康和行为结果的长期影响。
J Health Popul Nutr. 2022 Oct 4;41(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s41043-022-00326-6.
9
WHO's Robson platform for data-sharing on caesarean section rates.世界卫生组织的罗布森剖宫产率数据共享平台。
Bull World Health Organ. 2022 May 1;100(5):352-354. doi: 10.2471/BLT.21.287742. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
10
Can the Robson 10 Group Classification System help identify which groups of women are driving the high caesarean section rate in major private hospitals in eastern Ethiopia? A cross-sectional study.罗夫森 10 组分类系统能否帮助确定哪些妇女群体是导致埃塞俄比亚东部主要私立医院高剖宫产率的原因?一项横断面研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 26;11(8):e047206. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-047206.