Gálvez-Sánchez Rafael, Salmón González Zaida, Fernández-García Magdalena, Cerveró Varona Andrea, González-Mesones Belén, López-Hoyos Marcos, Martínez-Taboada Víctor, Luis Hernández José
Division of Rheumatology, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain.
Division of Internal Medicine, Hospital Universitario Marqués de Valdecilla, Instituto de Investigación Valdecilla, 39008 Santander, Spain.
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 19;14(8):2826. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082826.
Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) represents a common ophthalmological disorder that, if untreated, often leads to severely impaired vision. The classic vascular risk factors, aging and glaucoma, represent the core pathogenic factors for RVO. However, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has been involved in a non-negligible number of patients with RVO. The main objective of the present study was to assess the performance of the new 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS in a cohort of patients with RVO fulfilling the Sydney classification criteria. A prospective study of consecutive patients with RVO diagnosed with APS in a third-level university hospital. The new 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS were applied to all patients. Vascular risk factors, the antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) profile, clinical management, and clinical outcomes were assessed and compared between those fulfilling the Sydney and the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria. Sixty-nine RVO-APS patients were included in the study. After applying the new classification criteria, 18 patients (26.1%) did not fulfill the new criteria for APS. Specifically, 17 (24.6%) were excluded due to the new Domain 8 ( < 0.001) as they presented only aPL IgM serology, and 1 patient (1.4%) was excluded due to having high venous thromboembolic risk (VTE) with a clinical domain score < 3. Interestingly enough, the presence of high arterial risk (45.1% vs. 50%; = 0.72) was greater than the presence of high VTE (3.9% vs. 5.6%; = 0.99); in both cases, the 51 RVO-APS patients were classified with the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria, and the 18 cases were excluded according to the new classification criteria. Except for the expected differences in serological domains (Domain 7, < 0.001, and Domain 8, < 0.001), we did not find other significant differences in terms of prognosis or risk of recurrence between both groups of patients. The implementation of the new ACR/EULAR 2023 classification criteria for APS resulted in the exclusion of about one out of four previously diagnosed RVO-APS patients. The higher prevalence of manifestations of high arterial risk compared with high VTE among both newly classified and excluded APS patients highlights the importance of monitoring cardiovascular risk factors for both the prevention and the management of potential retinal and cardiovascular events.
视网膜静脉阻塞(RVO)是一种常见的眼科疾病,如果不进行治疗,往往会导致严重的视力损害。经典的血管危险因素,如衰老和青光眼,是RVO的核心致病因素。然而,抗磷脂综合征(APS)在相当数量的RVO患者中也有涉及。本研究的主要目的是评估2023年新的美国风湿病学会(ACR)/欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)APS分类标准在一组符合悉尼分类标准的RVO患者中的应用效果。在一家三级大学医院对连续诊断为RVO合并APS的患者进行前瞻性研究。将2023年新的ACR/EULAR APS分类标准应用于所有患者。对符合悉尼标准和2023年ACR/EULAR标准的患者的血管危险因素、抗磷脂抗体(aPL)谱、临床管理和临床结局进行评估和比较。69例RVO-APS患者纳入研究。应用新的分类标准后,18例患者(26.1%)不符合新的APS标准。具体而言,17例(24.6%)因新的第8领域(<0.001)被排除,因为他们仅表现为aPL IgM血清学,1例患者(1.4%)因静脉血栓栓塞高风险(VTE)且临床领域评分<3被排除。有趣的是,高动脉风险的存在(45.1%对50%;P = 0.72)大于高VTE的存在(3.9%对5.6%;P = 0.99);在这两种情况下,51例RVO-APS患者根据2023年ACR/EULAR标准进行分类,18例根据新的分类标准被排除。除了血清学领域的预期差异(第7领域,P<0.001,和第8领域,P<0.001)外,我们未发现两组患者在预后或复发风险方面存在其他显著差异。2023年新的ACR/EULAR APS分类标准的实施导致约四分之一先前诊断的RVO-APS患者被排除。在新分类和排除的APS患者中,高动脉风险表现的患病率高于高VTE,这突出了监测心血管危险因素对于预防和管理潜在视网膜及心血管事件的重要性。