Barak Shlomi, Waldenberg Netanel, Bar Guy, Barel Oshri, Dekalo Snir
Reproductive Services-Obstetrics and Gynecology, Assuta Ashdod University Hospital, Ashdod 6134789, Israel.
Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer Sheva 8410501, Israel.
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 20;14(8):2837. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082837.
: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness and reliability of point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) in the differential diagnosis of azoospermia. : Records of 175 patients who had previously been diagnosed with normal-volume, normal-PH azoospermia and who had undergone surgical sperm retrieval were reviewed retrospectively. Patients' preoperative evaluations included a comprehensive history and physical examination and a routine scrotal POCUS performed during their initial consultation by a non-radiologist treating andrologist in a clinic setting. Positive scrotal imaging revealed ectasia of the rete testis and/or dilation of the epididymal ductules. Based on their preoperative assessments, patients were guided to undergo either testicular sperm aspiration (TESA)/microsurgical sperm aspiration (MESA) procedures for those with suspected obstructive azoospermia (OA) or microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) for those with suspected non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). : Of the 175 patients, 58 patients had normal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels (≤12 IU/L) and normal testicular volume. Thirty of them had no secondary signs of obstruction in their scrotal POCUS and subsequently underwent micro-TESE. All were confirmed to have NOA. Twenty-eight patients demonstrated at least two secondary signs of obstruction on scrotal POCUS. Of these, 15 underwent TESA, and 13 underwent MESA procedures. Twenty-seven patients were confirmed to have OA, and one was confirmed as having NOA. Among this cohort of men, the sensitivity of scrotal POCUS in diagnosing OA was 100%, whereas the specificity was 96.8%. Positive and negative predictive values (PPVs and NPVs) were 96.4 and 100%, respectively. : Scrotal POCUS is an effective clinical diagnostic tool for distinguishing obstructive and non-obstructive azoospermia. Being noninvasive, safe, and affordable makes it an ideal bedside clinical tool that can serve the skilled non-radiologist clinician reliably.
本研究的目的是探讨床旁超声检查(POCUS)在无精子症鉴别诊断中的有效性和可靠性。回顾性分析了175例既往被诊断为精液量正常、pH值正常的无精子症且接受过手术取精的患者的记录。患者的术前评估包括全面的病史和体格检查,以及由诊所的男科医生(非放射科医生)在初次会诊时进行的常规阴囊POCUS检查。阴囊超声检查阳性表现为睾丸网扩张和/或附睾小管扩张。根据术前评估,对于疑似梗阻性无精子症(OA)的患者,指导其接受睾丸精子抽吸术(TESA)/显微外科精子抽吸术(MESA);对于疑似非梗阻性无精子症(NOA)的患者,指导其接受显微解剖睾丸精子提取术(micro-TESE)。在这175例患者中,58例患者的促卵泡生成素(FSH)水平正常(≤12 IU/L)且睾丸体积正常。其中30例患者阴囊POCUS检查无梗阻的继发征象,随后接受了micro-TESE。所有患者均被确诊为NOA。28例患者阴囊POCUS检查显示至少有两个梗阻的继发征象。其中,15例接受了TESA,13例接受了MESA手术。27例患者被确诊为OA,1例被确诊为NOA。在这组男性中,阴囊POCUS诊断OA的敏感性为100%,特异性为96.8%。阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为96.4%和100%。阴囊POCUS是区分梗阻性和非梗阻性无精子症的一种有效的临床诊断工具。它具有非侵入性、安全性高且费用低廉的特点,使其成为一种理想的床旁临床工具,能够可靠地为技术熟练的非放射科临床医生服务。