• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Coflex棘突间稳定术联合减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症:平均14年随访

Coflex Interspinous Stabilization with Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An Average 14-Year Follow-Up.

作者信息

Heo Juneyoung, Baek Ji-Hoon, Kim Ji Hyun, Chang Jae Chil, Park Hyung-Ki, Lee Su Chan

机构信息

Joint & Arthritis Research, Department of Neurosurgery, Himchan Hospital, Seoul 07999, Republic of Korea.

Joint & Arthritis Research, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Himchan Hospital, Seoul 07999, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 21;14(8):2856. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082856.

DOI:10.3390/jcm14082856
PMID:40283686
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12027502/
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the long-term clinical usefulness and radiologic changes around the Coflex device following decompression with Coflex insertion for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (DLSS), with an average follow-up of 14 years. This retrospective study included 147 patients who underwent decompression and Coflex insertion for single-level DLSS at a single institution between January 2007 and December 2010. Patients with spinal stenosis unresponsive to 3 months of conservative treatment were treated surgically. The mean follow-up duration was 173.9 ± 23.7 (range, 119-214) months. The mean visual analog scale score decreased from 8.22 ± 1.06 preoperatively to 2.08 ± 1.58 postoperatively. Intervertebral disc height and foramen height at the Coflex insertion site decreased by 5.3% and 2.0%, respectively, after surgery. The reoperation rate at the operated site was 25% ( = 37). A significantly higher reoperation rate was observed in patients with translational instability (odds ratio [OR], 7.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.453-24.658; < 0.01) and angular instability (OR, 1.59; 95% CI, 0.492-5.133; < 0.001). Eight patients underwent reoperation due to rapid progression of instability within 2 years of Coflex insertion; thereafter, a similar cumulative incidence rate was consistently observed. The adjacent-segment reoperation rate was 10.8% ( = 16). The Coflex interspinous device helps preserve disc and foramen height but is associated with a high reoperation rate, particularly in patients with spinal instability. Therefore, careful patient selection is crucial when considering its use.

摘要

本研究旨在评估采用Coflex装置减压并植入Coflex治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症(DLSS)后的长期临床效用及该装置周围的放射学变化,平均随访时间为14年。这项回顾性研究纳入了2007年1月至2010年12月期间在单一机构接受单节段DLSS减压及Coflex植入手术的147例患者。对保守治疗3个月无效的椎管狭窄患者进行手术治疗。平均随访时间为173.9±23.7(范围119 - 214)个月。平均视觉模拟量表评分从术前的8.22±1.06降至术后的2.08±1.58。手术后,Coflex植入部位的椎间盘高度和椎间孔高度分别下降了5.3%和2.0%。手术部位的再次手术率为25%(n = 37)。在存在平移性不稳定的患者中观察到显著更高的再次手术率(优势比[OR],7.77;95%置信区间[CI],2.453 - 24.658;P < 0.01)以及角向不稳定的患者(OR,1.59;95% CI,0.492 - 5.133;P < 0.001)。8例患者在Coflex植入后2年内因不稳定快速进展而接受再次手术;此后,持续观察到类似的累积发生率。相邻节段再次手术率为10.8%(n = 16)。Coflex棘突间装置有助于保留椎间盘和椎间孔高度,但与高再次手术率相关,尤其是在脊柱不稳定的患者中。因此,在考虑使用该装置时,仔细选择患者至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d01/12027502/67014f9da5a6/jcm-14-02856-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d01/12027502/67014f9da5a6/jcm-14-02856-g001a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0d01/12027502/67014f9da5a6/jcm-14-02856-g001a.jpg

相似文献

1
Coflex Interspinous Stabilization with Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: An Average 14-Year Follow-Up.Coflex棘突间稳定术联合减压治疗腰椎管狭窄症:平均14年随访
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 21;14(8):2856. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082856.
2
[Mid-term effectiveness of Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation combined with spinal fusion for lumbar disc degeneration].Coflex棘突间动态内固定联合脊柱融合术治疗腰椎间盘退变的中期疗效
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Mar 15;33(3):280-286. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201807099.
3
[Device implanted complications of Coflex interspinous dynamic stabilization].[Coflex棘突间动态稳定装置植入并发症]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;50(9):782-7.
4
Paradoxical Radiographic Changes of Coflex Interspinous Device with Minimum 2-Year Follow-Up in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.腰椎管狭窄症中使用Coflex棘突间装置至少随访2年的矛盾性影像学改变
World Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;85:177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.069. Epub 2015 Sep 7.
5
Evaluation of Coflex interspinous stabilization following decompression compared with decompression and posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease: A minimum 5-year follow-up study.减压术后Coflex棘突间稳定系统与减压及后路腰椎椎间融合术治疗腰椎退行性疾病的比较:一项至少5年的随访研究。
J Clin Neurosci. 2017 Jan;35:24-29. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2016.09.030. Epub 2016 Nov 1.
6
[Radiographic study of Coflex interspinous device for lumbar spinal stenosis].[Coflex棘突间装置治疗腰椎管狭窄症的影像学研究]
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jul 1;54(7):513-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2016.07.008.
7
Application of the Coflex Interlaminar Stabilization in Patients With L5/S1 Degenerative Diseases: Minimum 4-Year Follow-up.Coflex椎间融合器在L5/S1退行性疾病患者中的应用:至少4年随访
Am J Ther. 2016 Nov/Dec;23(6):e1813-e1818. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0000000000000333.
8
[Clinical evaluation of interspinous process device Coflex for degenerative disk diseases].棘突间植入物Coflex治疗椎间盘退变疾病的临床评估
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2012 Sep;50(9):776-81.
9
Coflex interspinous process dynamic stabilization for lumbar spinal stenosis: Long-term follow-up.Coflex 棘突间动态稳定系统治疗腰椎管狭窄症:长期随访结果
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Nov;81:462-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.09.040. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
10
[Coflex interspinous dynamic internal fixation for the treatment of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis].[Coflex棘突间动态内固定治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2009 Dec;22(12):902-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Discogenic Low Back Pain: Anatomic and Pathophysiologic Characterization, Clinical Evaluation, Biomarkers, AI, and Treatment Options.椎间盘源性下腰痛:解剖学和病理生理学特征、临床评估、生物标志物、人工智能及治疗选择
J Clin Med. 2024 Oct 3;13(19):5915. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195915.
2
Is the interspinous process device safe and effective in elderly patients with lumbar degeneration? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.棘突间装置在老年腰椎退变患者中是否安全有效?一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Spine J. 2024 Mar;33(3):881-891. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-08119-z. Epub 2024 Feb 12.
3
Biomechanical effect of Coflex and X-STOP spacers on the lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.
Coflex和X-STOP椎间融合器对腰椎的生物力学效应:有限元分析
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Jul 15;14(7):5155-5163. eCollection 2022.
4
Radiological Definitions of Sagittal Plane Segmental Instability in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine - A Systematic Review.退行性腰椎矢状面节段性不稳定的放射学定义——一项系统综述
Global Spine J. 2023 Mar;13(2):523-533. doi: 10.1177/21925682221099854. Epub 2022 May 23.
5
A minimum 8-year follow-up comparative study of decompression and coflex stabilization with decompression and fusion.减压联合Coflex内固定与减压联合融合术的至少8年随访对比研究
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Jun;21(6):595. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.10027. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
6
Coflex interspinous process dynamic stabilization for lumbar spinal stenosis: Long-term follow-up.Coflex 棘突间动态稳定系统治疗腰椎管狭窄症:长期随访结果
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Nov;81:462-468. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.09.040. Epub 2020 Nov 1.
7
Clinical validity of two different grading systems for lumbar central canal stenosis: Schizas and Lee classification systems.两种不同的腰椎中央管狭窄症分级系统的临床有效性:Schizas 和 Lee 分类系统。
PLoS One. 2020 May 27;15(5):e0233633. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233633. eCollection 2020.
8
Classification in Brief: The Meyerding Classification System of Spondylolisthesis.简要分类:腰椎滑脱的迈耶丁分类系统
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 May;478(5):1125-1130. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001153.
9
Decompression and coflex interlaminar stabilisation compared with conventional surgical procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.减压联合 coflex 棘突间稳定术与传统手术治疗腰椎管狭窄症的比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2017 Apr;40:60-67. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.02.056. Epub 2017 Feb 22.
10
Interspinous process spacers versus traditional decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.腰椎管狭窄症的棘突间撑开器与传统减压术:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Spine Surg. 2016 Mar;2(1):31-40. doi: 10.21037/jss.2016.01.07.