• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚热带喀斯特森林中石生兰花和地生兰花的不同叶片策略

Different Leaf Strategies Between Lithophytic and Terrestrial Orchids in a Subtropical Karst Forest.

作者信息

Yang Mei, Sun Dan, Wang Xiaoyin, Zhu Shidan, Goodale Uromi Manage

机构信息

Guangxi Key Laboratory of Forestry Ecology and Conservation, College of Forestry, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China.

Nanning Institute of Tropical Botany, Nanning Botanical Garden, Nanning 530029, China.

出版信息

Plants (Basel). 2025 Apr 8;14(8):1161. doi: 10.3390/plants14081161.

DOI:10.3390/plants14081161
PMID:40284049
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12030510/
Abstract

The leaf economic spectrum framework explains how plants optimize leaf traits for productivity, distribution, and stress tolerance. Orchids in Southwestern China's karst forests, especially lithophytic species, are challenged by prolonged drought and limited light availability. This study investigated different leaf strategies between lithophytic and terrestrial orchids under the harsh karst environment. We measured key leaf traits, including photosynthesis, structure, biomechanics, nitrogen allocation, and water relations, in twenty-two lithophytic and six terrestrial orchids in a subtropical karst forest. After accounting for phylogenetic influences, we found that lithophytic orchids had a higher leaf mass per area, cuticle thickness, and biomechanical resistance () but a lower maximum photosynthetic rate (A), nitrogen allocation to photosynthesis (N), and saturated water content (SWC) than terrestrial orchids. These results suggest that lithophytic orchids prioritize structural investment and stress tolerance over photosynthetic efficiency. Across species, N correlated positively with A and negatively with , highlighting nitrogen allocation as a key mechanism in leaf cost-benefit strategies. Additionally, SWC emerged as a critical driver of variation in multiple traits, supporting its integration into the leaf economic spectrum for orchids in karst ecosystems. This study offers new insights into orchid adaptation in subtropical karst environments, with implications for plant resilience under changing climates.

摘要

叶经济谱框架解释了植物如何优化叶片性状以提高生产力、分布范围和胁迫耐受性。中国西南部喀斯特森林中的兰花,尤其是附生植物,面临着长期干旱和光照有限的挑战。本研究调查了在恶劣的喀斯特环境下附生兰花和地生兰花之间不同的叶片策略。我们测量了亚热带喀斯特森林中22种附生兰花和6种地生兰花的关键叶片性状,包括光合作用、结构、生物力学、氮分配和水分关系。在考虑系统发育影响后,我们发现附生兰花比地生兰花具有更高的单位面积叶质量、角质层厚度和生物力学抗性,但最大光合速率(A)、光合氮分配(N)和饱和含水量(SWC)较低。这些结果表明,附生兰花在光合效率之上优先考虑结构投资和胁迫耐受性。在所有物种中,N与A呈正相关,与呈负相关,突出了氮分配作为叶片成本效益策略中的关键机制。此外,SWC成为多个性状变异的关键驱动因素,支持将其纳入喀斯特生态系统兰花的叶经济谱。本研究为亚热带喀斯特环境中的兰花适应性提供了新见解,对气候变化下的植物恢复力具有启示意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8cb/12030510/f3f3ca665d0e/plants-14-01161-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8cb/12030510/d3fbcf147e7c/plants-14-01161-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8cb/12030510/06133f45d313/plants-14-01161-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8cb/12030510/6ace64051508/plants-14-01161-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8cb/12030510/f3f3ca665d0e/plants-14-01161-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8cb/12030510/d3fbcf147e7c/plants-14-01161-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8cb/12030510/06133f45d313/plants-14-01161-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8cb/12030510/6ace64051508/plants-14-01161-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a8cb/12030510/f3f3ca665d0e/plants-14-01161-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Different Leaf Strategies Between Lithophytic and Terrestrial Orchids in a Subtropical Karst Forest.亚热带喀斯特森林中石生兰花和地生兰花的不同叶片策略
Plants (Basel). 2025 Apr 8;14(8):1161. doi: 10.3390/plants14081161.
2
Differentiation of water-related traits in terrestrial and epiphytic Cymbidium species.地生和附生兰花品种中与水分相关性状的差异
Front Plant Sci. 2015 Apr 22;6:260. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2015.00260. eCollection 2015.
3
Co-regulation of photosynthetic capacity by nitrogen, phosphorus and magnesium in a subtropical Karst forest in China.中国亚热带喀斯特森林中氮、磷和镁对光合作用能力的协同调节。
Sci Rep. 2018 May 9;8(1):7406. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25839-1.
4
Contrasting Hydraulic Efficiency and Photosynthesis Strategy in Differential Successional Stages of a Subtropical Forest in a Karst Region.喀斯特地区亚热带森林不同演替阶段的水力效率与光合作用策略对比
Plants (Basel). 2021 Nov 27;10(12):2604. doi: 10.3390/plants10122604.
5
Leaf anatomical structures of Paphiopedilum and Cypripedium and their adaptive significance.杓兰属和兜兰属的叶解剖结构及其适应意义。
J Plant Res. 2011 Mar;124(2):289-98. doi: 10.1007/s10265-010-0372-z. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
6
Do photosynthetic metabolism and habitat influence foliar water uptake in orchids?光合作用代谢和栖息地会影响兰花叶片对水分的吸收吗?
Plant Biol (Stuttg). 2023 Mar;25(2):257-267. doi: 10.1111/plb.13499. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
7
Morphological and physiological adaptation characteristics of lithophytic bryophytes to karst high calcium environment.石生苔藓植物对喀斯特高钙环境的形态和生理适应特征。
BMC Plant Biol. 2023 Mar 25;23(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12870-022-03980-4.
8
Height-related changes in leaf photosynthetic traits in diverse Bornean tropical rain forest trees.婆罗洲不同热带雨林树木叶片光合特性与高度相关的变化
Oecologia. 2015 Jan;177(1):191-202. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-3126-0. Epub 2014 Nov 2.
9
Spatial patterns of photosynthesis in thin- and thick-leaved epiphytic orchids: unravelling C3-CAM plasticity in an organ-compartmented way.薄叶附生兰花和厚叶附生兰花光合作用的空间格局:以器官分隔的方式揭示 C3-CAM 可塑性。
Ann Bot. 2013 Jul;112(1):17-29. doi: 10.1093/aob/mct090. Epub 2013 Apr 25.
10
Ecophysiological significance of leaf traits in Cypripedium and Paphiopedilum.杓兰属和兜兰属叶片性状的生理生态学意义。
Physiol Plant. 2011 Jan;141(1):30-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3054.2010.01418.x. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Variation characteristics of extreme climate events in Southwest China from 1961 to 2017.1961—2017年中国西南地区极端气候事件的变化特征
Heliyon. 2023 Aug 30;9(9):e19648. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19648. eCollection 2023 Sep.
2
Mesophyll conductance and N allocation co-explained the variation in photosynthesis in two canola genotypes under contrasting nitrogen supply.在不同氮素供应条件下,叶肉导度和氮分配共同解释了两种油菜基因型光合作用的变化。
Front Plant Sci. 2023 May 8;14:1171331. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1171331. eCollection 2023.
3
The Plant Leaf: A Biomimetic Resource for Multifunctional and Economic Design.
植物叶片:一种用于多功能与经济设计的仿生资源。
Biomimetics (Basel). 2023 Apr 3;8(2):145. doi: 10.3390/biomimetics8020145.
4
Incorporating pressure-volume traits into the leaf economics spectrum.将压力-容积特性纳入叶片经济谱。
Ecol Lett. 2023 Apr;26(4):549-562. doi: 10.1111/ele.14176. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
5
Leaf water content contributes to global leaf trait relationships.叶片水分含量影响全球叶片特征关系。
Nat Commun. 2022 Sep 21;13(1):5525. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-32784-1.
6
Effect of the odour compound from Periploca sepium Bunge on the physiological and biochemical indices, photosynthesis and ultrastructure of the leaves of Humulus scandens (Lour.) Merr.杠柳气味化合物对葎草叶片生理生化指标、光合作用及超微结构的影响
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2022 Jun 15;238:113556. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2022.113556. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
7
Enhanced photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency and increased nitrogen allocation to photosynthetic machinery under cotton domestication.在棉花驯化过程中,增强了光合作用氮利用效率,并增加了氮向光合作用机器的分配。
Photosynth Res. 2021 Dec;150(1-3):239-250. doi: 10.1007/s11120-021-00872-w. Epub 2021 Oct 20.
8
Spatial-temporal shifts of ecological vulnerability of Karst Mountain ecosystem-impacts of global change and anthropogenic interference.喀斯特山地生态系统脆弱性的时空演变——全球变化和人为干扰的影响。
Sci Total Environ. 2020 Nov 1;741:140256. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140256. Epub 2020 Jun 23.
9
Plant Trait Networks: Improved Resolution of the Dimensionality of Adaptation.植物性状网络:提高适应维度的分辨率。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2020 Oct;35(10):908-918. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2020.06.003. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
10
The contrasting leaf functional traits between a karst forest and a nearby non-karst forest in south-west China.中国西南喀斯特森林与附近非喀斯特森林的叶片功能性状对比。
Funct Plant Biol. 2019 Sep;46(10):907-915. doi: 10.1071/FP19103.