• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同动物源性产品排除情况的饮食碳足迹:波兰探索性研究。

The Carbon Footprint of Diets with Different Exclusions of Animal-Derived Products: Exploratory Polish Study.

作者信息

Choręziak Anna, Rzymski Piotr

机构信息

Department of Environmental Medicine, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, 60-806 Poznań, Poland.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2025 Apr 19;17(8):1377. doi: 10.3390/nu17081377.

DOI:10.3390/nu17081377
PMID:40284240
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12030518/
Abstract

Analyzing the carbon footprint of diets in various populations is important as it can help identify more sustainable food choices that reduce the overall impact of human activities on ongoing warming of the global climate. This pilot exploratory study analyzed the carbon footprint (measured in kg of CO equivalent, eq.) using food diaries collected from Polish individuals with varying levels of animal-derived product exclusion in their diets. The study employed a food diary method, where participants from four dietary groups (vegan, vegetarian, fish-eater, and meat-eater) recorded all meals and beverages consumed over a 7-day period, including portion sizes and packaging details. These diaries were then analyzed to assess dietary adherence and calculate carbon footprints, utilizing standardized CO equivalent emission data from publicly available databases. The analysis revealed a decreasing trend in the carbon footprint corresponding to the degree of elimination of animal-derived products from the diet (R = 0.96, = 0.0217). The mean daily footprint in the vegan group was 1.38 kg CO eq., which was significantly lower than in the vegetarian (2.45), fish-eater (2.72), and meat-eater groups (3.62). For each 1000 kcal, the meat-eater diet generated 39.7, 58.3, and 93.9% more CO eq. than in the case of fish-eaters, vegetarians, and vegans, respectively. Over a week, a group of 10 vegans had a total carbon footprint lower than vegetarians, fish-eaters, and meat-eaters by 42.9, 52.2, and 61.8%, respectively. Hard and mozzarella cheese had the highest contribution to the carbon footprint in vegetarians, fish, and seafood in fish-eaters, and poultry, pork, and beef had the highest contribution in meat-eaters. Dietary carbon footprints vary considerably by dietary pattern, with lower consumption of animal-derived products associated with lower emissions. Additionally, identifying specific high-impact food items within each diet may inform strategies for reducing environmental impact across various eating patterns.

摘要

分析不同人群饮食的碳足迹很重要,因为这有助于确定更具可持续性的食物选择,从而减少人类活动对全球气候持续变暖的总体影响。这项试点探索性研究使用从波兰收集的食物日记分析了碳足迹(以千克二氧化碳当量,eq.为单位),这些日记来自饮食中动物源性产品排除程度不同的个体。该研究采用了食物日记法,来自四个饮食组(纯素食者、素食者、食鱼者和肉食者)的参与者记录了他们在7天内食用的所有餐食和饮料,包括份量大小和包装细节。然后利用公开数据库中的标准化二氧化碳当量排放数据对这些日记进行分析,以评估饮食依从性并计算碳足迹。分析显示,碳足迹随着饮食中动物源性产品的排除程度呈下降趋势(R = 0.96, = 0.0217)。纯素食组的平均每日碳足迹为1.38千克二氧化碳当量,明显低于素食组(2.45)、食鱼组(2.72)和肉食组(3.62)。每1000千卡热量,肉食者饮食产生的二氧化碳当量分别比食鱼者、素食者和纯素食者多39.7%、58.3%和93.9%。在一周时间里,一组10名纯素食者的总碳足迹分别比素食者、食鱼者和肉食者低42.9%、52.2%和61.8%。硬质奶酪和马苏里拉奶酪对素食者的碳足迹贡献最大,鱼类和海鲜对食鱼者的碳足迹贡献最大,而家禽、猪肉和牛肉对肉食者的碳足迹贡献最大。饮食碳足迹因饮食模式而异,动物源性产品消费量较低与排放量较低相关。此外,确定每种饮食中特定的高影响食物项目可能为减少各种饮食模式对环境影响的策略提供参考。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10e7/12030518/60b8db5124c0/nutrients-17-01377-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10e7/12030518/60b8db5124c0/nutrients-17-01377-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/10e7/12030518/60b8db5124c0/nutrients-17-01377-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Carbon Footprint of Diets with Different Exclusions of Animal-Derived Products: Exploratory Polish Study.不同动物源性产品排除情况的饮食碳足迹:波兰探索性研究。
Nutrients. 2025 Apr 19;17(8):1377. doi: 10.3390/nu17081377.
2
Dietary Intake of High-Protein Foods and Other Major Foods in Meat-Eaters, Poultry-Eaters, Fish-Eaters, Vegetarians, and Vegans in UK Biobank.英国生物库中肉食者、禽肉消费者、鱼类消费者、素食者和严格素食者的高蛋白食物和其他主要食物的饮食摄入量。
Nutrients. 2017 Dec 2;9(12):1317. doi: 10.3390/nu9121317.
3
Comparison of Sociodemographic and Nutritional Characteristics between Self-Reported Vegetarians, Vegans, and Meat-Eaters from the NutriNet-Santé Study.《NutriNet-Santé 研究中自报素食者、严格素食者和肉食者的社会人口学和营养特征比较》
Nutrients. 2017 Sep 15;9(9):1023. doi: 10.3390/nu9091023.
4
High compliance with dietary recommendations in a cohort of meat eaters, fish eaters, vegetarians, and vegans: results from the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Oxford study.肉食者、食鱼者、素食者和纯素食者队列对饮食建议的高依从性:欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查——牛津研究的结果
Nutr Res. 2016 May;36(5):464-77. doi: 10.1016/j.nutres.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Jan 6.
5
Cooking at Home, Fast Food, Meat Consumption, and Dietary Carbon Footprint among US Adults.在家烹饪、快餐、肉类消费与美国成年人的饮食碳足迹。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jan 13;19(2):853. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19020853.
6
Plant-based dietary patterns and ultra-processed food consumption: a cross-sectional analysis of the UK Biobank.基于植物的饮食模式与超加工食品消费:英国生物银行的横断面分析
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Nov 14;78:102931. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102931. eCollection 2024 Dec.
7
Serum metabolite profiles of habitual diet: evaluation by 1H-nuclear magnetic resonance analysis.习惯性饮食的血清代谢物谱:通过 1H 核磁共振分析进行评估。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2019 Jul 1;110(1):53-62. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqz032.
8
Urine Metabolite Profiles and Nutrient Intake Based on 4-Day Weighed Food Diary in Habitual Vegans, Vegetarians, and Omnivores.基于 4 天称重食物日记的习惯性素食者、素食者和杂食者的尿代谢物谱和营养素摄入量。
J Nutr. 2021 Jan 4;151(1):30-39. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa019.
9
Weight gain over 5 years in 21,966 meat-eating, fish-eating, vegetarian, and vegan men and women in EPIC-Oxford.在欧洲癌症与营养前瞻性调查(EPIC - 牛津)中,21966名食肉、食鱼、素食和纯素食的男性及女性5年期间的体重增加情况。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2006 Sep;30(9):1389-96. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803305. Epub 2006 Mar 14.
10
Dietary intake and status of n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids in a population of fish-eating and non-fish-eating meat-eaters, vegetarians, and vegans and the product-precursor ratio [corrected] of α-linolenic acid to long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: results from the EPIC-Norfolk cohort.吃鱼和不吃鱼的杂食者、素食者和严格素食者人群中 n-3 多不饱和脂肪酸的饮食摄入和状况,以及 α-亚麻酸与长链 n-3 多不饱和脂肪酸的产物前体比:EPIC-Norfolk 队列的结果。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Nov;92(5):1040-51. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2010.29457. Epub 2010 Sep 22.

本文引用的文献

1
The rise of eco-anxiety: scientists wake up to the mental-health toll of climate change.生态焦虑的兴起:科学家们开始意识到气候变化对心理健康的影响。
Nature. 2024 Apr;628(8007):256-258. doi: 10.1038/d41586-024-00998-6.
2
Avian influenza outbreaks in domestic cats: another reason to consider slaughter-free cell-cultured poultry?家猫感染禽流感疫情:这是考虑无屠宰细胞培养家禽的另一个原因吗?
Front Microbiol. 2023 Dec 15;14:1283361. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1283361. eCollection 2023.
3
The Heat about Cultured Meat in Poland: A Cross-Sectional Acceptance Study.
波兰的人造肉热潮:一项横断面接受度研究。
Nutrients. 2023 Nov 2;15(21):4649. doi: 10.3390/nu15214649.
4
Feeding climate and biodiversity goals with novel plant-based meat and milk alternatives.用新型植物性肉类和奶类替代品满足饮食与气候和生物多样性目标。
Nat Commun. 2023 Sep 12;14(1):5316. doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-40899-2.
5
Vegans, vegetarians, fish-eaters and meat-eaters in the UK show discrepant environmental impacts.英国的纯素食者、素食者、食鱼者和肉食者表现出不同的环境影响。
Nat Food. 2023 Jul;4(7):565-574. doi: 10.1038/s43016-023-00795-w. Epub 2023 Jul 20.
6
Red and Processed Meat Consumption in Poland.波兰的红肉和加工肉类消费情况。
Foods. 2022 Oct 20;11(20):3283. doi: 10.3390/foods11203283.
7
Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods.来自动物性食品的全球温室气体排放量是植物性食品的两倍。
Nat Food. 2021 Sep;2(9):724-732. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
8
Food systems are responsible for a third of global anthropogenic GHG emissions.食物系统产生的温室气体排放量占全球人为温室气体排放总量的三分之一。
Nat Food. 2021 Mar;2(3):198-209. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00225-9. Epub 2021 Mar 8.
9
Popular diets as selected by adults in the United States show wide variation in carbon footprints and diet quality.美国成年人选择的流行饮食在碳足迹和饮食质量方面存在广泛差异。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2023 Apr;117(4):701-708. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.01.009. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
10
Food Habits: Insights from Food Diaries via Computational Recurrence Measures.饮食习惯:基于计算复现测度的饮食日记分析。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Apr 2;22(7):2753. doi: 10.3390/s22072753.