Shinozuka Yasunori, Kanda Takuya, Hisaeda Keiichi, Goto Akira, Inoue Yoichi, Yamamoto Naoki
Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Okayama University of Science, Imabari 794-8555, Ehime, Japan.
Microorganisms. 2025 Apr 3;13(4):819. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms13040819.
This study clarified the effectiveness of external teat sealant (ETS) in preventing intramammary infections during lactation, using a cross-over study of two experiments (3 cows × 2 periods each) on a dairy farm. In Experiment 1, the control (Group A) received pre-dip and post-dip treatments, while the experimental group (Group B) received ETS application instead of post-dip treatment. In Experiment 2, Group C was treated the same as Group B, and Group D received ETS treatment only. After the intervention, teat ends were tested using ATP swabs, and milk collections from the first and last foremilk (Samples 1 and 2, respectively) were conducted over 4 days (8 times in total). In Experiment 1, the ETS application group exhibited lower ATP ( < 0.01) and bacterial counts (BC1, = 0.02) compared to the control. Conversely, no differences in variables were observed in Experiment 2. The isolation rate of spp. (>500 colony forming units) from Sample 2 in Groups C and D was significantly higher than that in groups A and B ( < 0.01). Replacing post-milking teat disinfection with ETS does not decrease viable bacterial counts and actually increases the proportion of spp. ETS application is thus not an effective substitute for teat orifice disinfection.
本研究通过在一个奶牛场进行的两个实验(每个实验有3头奶牛×2个时期)的交叉研究,阐明了外部乳头密封剂(ETS)在预防泌乳期间乳房内感染方面的有效性。在实验1中,对照组(A组)接受挤奶前浸药和挤奶后浸药处理,而实验组(B组)接受ETS处理而非挤奶后浸药处理。在实验2中,C组的处理方式与B组相同,D组仅接受ETS处理。干预后,使用ATP拭子对乳头末端进行检测,并在4天内(共8次)收集首次和末次前奶(分别为样本1和样本2)。在实验1中,与对照组相比,ETS处理组的ATP含量(<0.01)和细菌计数(BC1,=0.02)较低。相反,在实验2中未观察到变量差异。C组和D组样本2中 spp.(>500菌落形成单位)的分离率显著高于A组和B组(<0.01)。用ETS替代挤奶后乳头消毒并不能降低活菌计数,实际上还会增加 spp.的比例。因此,ETS的应用并不是乳头孔消毒的有效替代方法。