Lim G H, Leslie K E, Kelton D F, Duffield T F, Timms L L, Dingwell R T
Department of Population Medicine, Ontario Veterinary College, Guelph, Ontario, Canada N1G 2W1.
J Dairy Sci. 2007 Mar;90(3):1289-300. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(07)71617-X.
The efficacy and adherence of an external teat sealant applied at drying off was evaluated in 2 studies between 1997 and 1999. At drying off, 2 quarters were randomized to receive intramammary dry-cow antibiotic therapy, and the remaining 2 quarters were treated with either a single or double application of external teat sealant. Approximately 3 d before calving, all teats that had been dipped at drying off were redipped in a single coating of teat sealant. Adherence of the teat sealant was scored for the first 2 wk after drying off, and physical traits of the teat skin and teat ends were recorded. Quarter milk samples were collected 1 wk before drying off, at drying off, 0 to 7 d, and 14 to 21 d postcalving. Somatic cell counts were determined from quarter samples taken at d 7 and 14 to 21 d after calving. Data were analyzed from 172 dry periods of 162 cows. The mean time of sealant adherence following drying off application was 3 +/- 0.13 d. Double sealant application significantly increased the duration of adherence by 0.67 d. Teats that had teat sealant applied twice at drying off and that had up to 3 d of adherence had the lowest linear score (LS) at 14 to 21 d (1.89 +/- 0.31) of all quarters. The LS of quarters that received antibiotic therapy only was 2.27 +/- 0.19. The majority of intramammary infections identified at drying off were caused by the minor pathogens, coagulase-negative staphylococci and Corynebacterium bovis (51 and 23%, respectively). The results from this study indicate that duration of sealant adherence to the teat-end should be considered when evaluating the impact of teat sealant treatment at drying off on the level of infection after calving. Double sealant application, cooler seasons, and longer teat lengths were associated with a significant increase in the duration of sealant adherence to the teat-end.
在1997年至1999年期间的两项研究中,对干奶期使用的一种外部乳头密封剂的功效和附着情况进行了评估。在干奶时,随机选择两个乳腺区接受乳房内干奶牛抗生素治疗,其余两个乳腺区则单次或两次涂抹外部乳头密封剂。在产犊前约3天,所有在干奶时浸泡过的乳头再次浸泡在单层乳头密封剂中。在干奶后的前2周对乳头密封剂的附着情况进行评分,并记录乳头皮肤和乳头末端的物理特征。在干奶前1周、干奶时、产犊后0至7天以及14至21天采集乳腺区牛奶样本。从产犊后第7天以及14至21天采集的乳腺区样本中测定体细胞计数。对162头奶牛的172个干奶期数据进行了分析。干奶期涂抹密封剂后,密封剂的平均附着时间为3±0.13天。两次涂抹密封剂显著增加了附着持续时间0.67天。在干奶时两次涂抹乳头密封剂且附着时间长达3天的乳头,在所有乳腺区中,在14至21天时线性评分(LS)最低(1.89±0.31)。仅接受抗生素治疗的乳腺区的LS为2.27±0.19。在干奶时发现的大多数乳房内感染是由次要病原体引起的,凝固酶阴性葡萄球菌和牛棒状杆菌(分别为51%和23%)。本研究结果表明,在评估干奶期乳头密封剂处理对产犊后感染水平的影响时,应考虑密封剂在乳头末端的附着持续时间。两次涂抹密封剂、较凉爽的季节以及较长的乳头长度与密封剂在乳头末端的附着持续时间显著增加有关。