M-team and Mastitis and Milk Quality Research Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
M-team and Mastitis and Milk Quality Research Unit, Department of Reproduction, Obstetrics and Herd Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, 9820 Merelbeke, Belgium.
J Dairy Sci. 2020 Jul;103(7):6569-6575. doi: 10.3168/jds.2019-17575. Epub 2020 Apr 22.
The main objective of this study was to evaluate the barrier characteristics of 3 external teat sealants for dry cows in preventing bacterial penetration by 3 common major mastitis pathogens (Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, and Streptococcus uberis) via a novel in vitro simulation model using rubber calf-feeding nipples. All feeding nipples were filled with a sterile cotton plug soaked in sterile broth heart infusion medium and were treated as follows: rubber teats 1 and 5 were sealed with Ubera Dry (Inovet, Arendonk, Belgium); rubber teats 2 and 6 were sealed with T-Hexx Dry (Huvepharma Livestock, St. Louis, MO); rubber teats 3 and 7 were sealed with Uddergold Dry (Ecolab Food and Beverage Division, St. Paul, MN); and rubber teats 4 and 8 remained unsealed and served as positive and negative controls, respectively. After the dips had dried, rubber teats 1 to 4 were immersed in a suspension of E. coli (experiment 1), Staph. aureus (experiment 2), or Strep. uberis (experiment 3; ≥1.5 × 10 cfu/mL) for 24 h, whereas rubber teats 5 to 8 were not exposed to the bacterial suspensions. All external teat sealants adhered well to the rubber teats. All cotton plugs collected from the teats that were not exposed to E. coli, Staph. aureus, or Strep. uberis (rubber teats 5 to 8) remained culture-negative, except for 1 (due to contamination). Of the rubber teats that were exposed to the major mastitis pathogens, all cotton plugs collected from the teats dipped with Ubera Dry and T-Hexx Dry remained culture-negative for the mastitis pathogen they were exposed to. The cotton plugs of the rubber teats that were sealed with Uddergold Dry and exposed to E. coli and Strep. uberis showed positive cultures for the respective bacteria, as demonstrated using strain-typing. The cotton plugs collected from the rubber teats that were not sealed with an external teat sealant and that served as positive controls became culture-positive for the mastitis pathogens they were exposed to. We conclude that Ubera Dry showed comparable and superior barrier performance against penetration of E. coli, Staph. aureus, and Strep. uberis compared with T-Hexx Dry and Uddergold Dry, respectively, under in vitro conditions using a novel in vitro simulation model. Although one should be aware that the method has not yet been validated to predict risk of intramammary infections, the proposed technique can be a meaningful starting point to evaluate and compare the barrier characteristics of external teat sealants in preventing bacterial penetration. A large-scale clinical trial is needed before any definite conclusions can be drawn as to the adherence, duration of adherence, barrier performance, and efficacy in protection against intramammary infections of the 3 external teat sealants under field conditions.
本研究的主要目的是评估 3 种外部乳头密封剂在预防干奶牛乳腺炎的主要病原体(大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和无乳链球菌)穿透方面的屏障特性,使用新型体外模拟模型,通过橡胶小牛喂养奶嘴。所有喂养奶嘴都填充了一个无菌的棉花塞,浸泡在无菌肉汤心浸液中,并进行如下处理:橡胶奶嘴 1 和 5 用 Ubera Dry(Inovet,Arendonk,比利时)密封;橡胶奶嘴 2 和 6 用 T-Hexx Dry(Huvepharma Livestock,圣路易斯,密苏里州)密封;橡胶奶嘴 3 和 7 用 Uddergold Dry(Ecolab Food and Beverage Division,圣保罗,明尼苏达州)密封;橡胶奶嘴 4 和 8 未密封,分别作为阳性和阴性对照。浸泡干燥后,橡胶奶嘴 1 至 4 浸入大肠杆菌(实验 1)、金黄色葡萄球菌(实验 2)或无乳链球菌(实验 3;≥1.5×10 cfu/mL)悬浮液中 24 小时,而橡胶奶嘴 5 至 8 未暴露于细菌悬浮液中。所有外部乳头密封剂均牢固地粘附在橡胶奶嘴上。所有未暴露于大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌或无乳链球菌的奶嘴收集的棉花塞(橡胶奶嘴 5 至 8)保持培养阴性,除 1 个(因污染)外。在暴露于主要乳腺炎病原体的奶嘴中,所有用 Ubera Dry 和 T-Hexx Dry 浸泡的奶嘴收集的棉花塞均对其暴露的乳腺炎病原体保持培养阴性。用 Uddergold Dry 密封并暴露于大肠杆菌和无乳链球菌的橡胶奶嘴的棉花塞显示出各自细菌的阳性培养,如通过菌株分型所示。未用外部乳头密封剂密封且作为阳性对照的橡胶奶嘴收集的棉花塞对其暴露的乳腺炎病原体呈培养阳性。我们得出结论,在使用新型体外模拟模型的体外条件下,与 T-Hexx Dry 和 Uddergold Dry 相比,Ubera Dry 对大肠杆菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和无乳链球菌的穿透具有相当和优越的屏障性能。尽管应该意识到该方法尚未经过验证以预测乳腺炎感染的风险,但所提出的技术可以作为评估和比较外部乳头密封剂在预防细菌穿透方面的屏障特性的有意义的起点。在得出任何明确结论之前,还需要进行大规模的临床试验,以了解 3 种外部乳头密封剂在田间条件下的粘附性、粘附持续时间、屏障性能和对乳腺炎感染的保护效果。