Suppr超能文献

与实验室测量相比,Apple Watch Series 6测量心率变异性的有效性。

Validity of Heart Rate Variability Measured with Apple Watch Series 6 Compared to Laboratory Measures.

作者信息

Bonneval Lauren, Wing David, Sharp Sydney, Tristao Parra Maira, Moran Ryan, LaCroix Andrea, Godino Job

机构信息

San Diego General Preventive Medicine Residency, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

Exercise and Physical Activity Resource Center, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2025 Apr 9;25(8):2380. doi: 10.3390/s25082380.

Abstract

We assessed the test validity of the Apple Watch series 6 measure of heart rate variability (HRV) by comparing it with the reference measure assessed via a Biopac 3-lead electrocardiogram (ECG). We recruited 78 healthy adults (aged 20-75 years). HRV was measured using an in-lab protocol while resting, talking, watching a movie, before walking, and after walking. We conducted a synchronized countdown for each condition to guarantee that the recordings would be aligned between the two devices by using event markers in the Biopac at the exact time that the Apple Watch Breathe app began and ended. We assessed test validity using the Bland-Altman method, and both precision and accuracy were estimated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient. The highest level of agreement and concordance between devices occurred during rest. We observed near-perfect agreement for R-R intervals and beats per minute (BPM) measures, with mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of 1.15% during resting conditions. We observed moderate levels of agreement and concordance for N-N intervals at rest with a MAPE of 31.31% during resting conditions. The Apple Watch provides a high level of validity for measuring R-R intervals and BPM in healthy adults. Further research is needed to determine if HRV measures with the Apple Watch offer a significant opportunity for the surveillance of CVD risk.

摘要

我们通过将Apple Watch Series 6的心率变异性(HRV)测量值与通过Biopac三导联心电图(ECG)评估的参考测量值进行比较,评估了其测试有效性。我们招募了78名健康成年人(年龄在20至75岁之间)。在休息、交谈、看电影、步行前和步行后,使用实验室方案测量HRV。我们针对每种情况进行同步倒计时,以确保通过在Apple Watch呼吸应用程序开始和结束的精确时间使用Biopac中的事件标记,使两个设备之间的记录对齐。我们使用Bland-Altman方法评估测试有效性,并使用Lin一致性相关系数估计精度和准确性。设备之间的最高一致性和协调性出现在休息期间。我们观察到R-R间期和每分钟心跳数(BPM)测量值几乎完全一致,在休息状态下平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE)为1.15%。我们观察到休息时N-N间期的一致性和协调性处于中等水平,休息状态下MAPE为31.31%。Apple Watch在测量健康成年人的R-R间期和BPM方面具有较高的有效性。需要进一步研究以确定使用Apple Watch进行的HRV测量是否为心血管疾病(CVD)风险监测提供了重要机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/eb4d/12031371/a61dd4c78977/sensors-25-02380-g0A1a.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验