• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Axivity AX6加速度计在技术和人体运动条件下的变异性与可靠性

Variability and Reliability of the Axivity AX6 Accelerometer in Technical and Human Motion Conditions.

作者信息

Echevarría-Polo Marcos, Marín Pedro J, Pueyo Esther, Ramos Maqueda Javier, Garatachea Nuria

机构信息

EXER-GENUD "Growth, Exercise, NUtrition and Development" Research Group, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain.

Faculty of Health and Sports Sciences, University of Zaragoza, 22001 Huesca, Spain.

出版信息

Sensors (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;25(8):2480. doi: 10.3390/s25082480.

DOI:10.3390/s25082480
PMID:40285170
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12030871/
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and inter-instrument variability and reliability of the Axivity AX6 accelerometer under controlled technical conditions and human motion scenarios. In the first experiment, 12 accelerometers were affixed to a vibration platform and tested at four frequencies (2.2, 3.2, 6.5, and 9.4 Hz) along three axes to assess frequency- and axis-dependent variability. In the second experiment, four AX6 accelerometers were simultaneously placed on a subject's wrist and tested under four human motion conditions (walking at 4 km·h and 6 km·h and running at 8 km·h and 10 km·h). Results demonstrated low intra- and inter-instrument variability (CVintra: 3.3-4.5%; CVinter: 6.3-7.7%) with high reliability (ICC = 0.98). Similar results were observed in human motion conditions (CVintra: 5.3-8.8%; CVinter: 7.1-10.4%), with ICC values of 0.98 for combined devices, and 0.99 for each device individually. Despite statistically significant differences ( < 0.05) between devices in human motion all conditions, the variations remained below the minimal clinically significant difference threshold. These findings indicate that under technical conditions on a vibrating platform, and within the range of typical human accelerations, the Axivity AX6 is a reliable tool for measuring accelerations representative of physical activity. However, further research is necessary to validate its performance under free-living conditions.

摘要

本研究旨在评估在受控技术条件和人体运动场景下,Axivity AX6加速度计的仪器内和仪器间变异性及可靠性。在第一个实验中,将12个加速度计固定在振动平台上,并沿三个轴在四个频率(2.2、3.2、6.5和9.4Hz)下进行测试,以评估频率和轴相关的变异性。在第二个实验中,将四个AX6加速度计同时放置在受试者的手腕上,并在四种人体运动条件下(以4km·h和6km·h的速度行走以及以8km·h和10km·h的速度跑步)进行测试。结果表明,仪器内和仪器间变异性较低(仪器内变异系数CVintra:3.3 - 4.5%;仪器间变异系数CVinter:6.3 - 7.7%),可靠性较高(组内相关系数ICC = 0.98)。在人体运动条件下也观察到了类似结果(仪器内变异系数CVintra:5.3 - 8.8%;仪器间变异系数CVinter:7.1 - 10.4%),组合设备的ICC值为0.98,每个设备单独的ICC值为0.99。尽管在所有人体运动条件下不同设备之间存在统计学显著差异(P < 0.05),但变化仍低于最小临床显著差异阈值。这些发现表明,在振动平台的技术条件下以及典型人体加速度范围内,Axivity AX6是测量代表身体活动的加速度的可靠工具。然而,需要进一步研究以验证其在自由生活条件下的性能。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/12030871/da88228bffe8/sensors-25-02480-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/12030871/ae908d935af7/sensors-25-02480-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/12030871/27b6ae6d6dc2/sensors-25-02480-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/12030871/1f09190a12f7/sensors-25-02480-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/12030871/da88228bffe8/sensors-25-02480-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/12030871/ae908d935af7/sensors-25-02480-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/12030871/27b6ae6d6dc2/sensors-25-02480-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/12030871/1f09190a12f7/sensors-25-02480-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/833b/12030871/da88228bffe8/sensors-25-02480-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Variability and Reliability of the Axivity AX6 Accelerometer in Technical and Human Motion Conditions.Axivity AX6加速度计在技术和人体运动条件下的变异性与可靠性
Sensors (Basel). 2025 Apr 15;25(8):2480. doi: 10.3390/s25082480.
2
Validation of physical activity levels from shank-placed Axivity AX6 accelerometers in older adults.老年人胫骨放置式 Axivity AX6 加速度计的体力活动水平验证。
PLoS One. 2024 May 13;19(5):e0290912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290912. eCollection 2024.
3
Technical variability of the GT3X accelerometer.GT3X 加速度计的技术变异性。
Med Eng Phys. 2012 Jul;34(6):787-90. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2012.02.005. Epub 2012 Mar 13.
4
Technical variability of the Vivago® wrist-worn accelerometer.Vivago®腕戴式加速度计的技术变异性
J Sports Sci. 2014;32(19):1768-74. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2014.918643. Epub 2014 May 19.
5
Validity of a trunk-mounted accelerometer to assess peak accelerations during walking, jogging and running.用于评估步行、慢跑和跑步过程中峰值加速度的躯干佩戴式加速度计的有效性。
Eur J Sport Sci. 2015;15(5):382-90. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2014.955131. Epub 2014 Sep 8.
6
Technical reliability assessment of three accelerometer models in a mechanical setup.三种加速度计模型在机械装置中的技术可靠性评估
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006 Dec;38(12):2173-81. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000239394.55461.08.
7
Intermonitor variability of GT3X accelerometer.GT3X 加速度计的监测变异性。
Int J Sports Med. 2012 Dec;33(12):994-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1312580. Epub 2012 Jul 12.
8
Normative wrist-worn accelerometer values for self-paced walking and running: a walk in the park.用于自主步行和跑步的腕戴式加速度计的规范值:公园里散步。
J Sports Sci. 2022 Jan;40(1):81-88. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1976491. Epub 2021 Sep 20.
9
Intra- and inter-instrument reliability of the actiwatch 4 accelerometer in a mechanical laboratory setting.在机械实验室环境中,actiwatch 4 加速度计的仪器内和仪器间可靠性。
J Hum Kinet. 2012 Mar;31:17-24. doi: 10.2478/v10078-012-0002-z. Epub 2012 Apr 3.
10
Technical variability of the RT3 accelerometer.RT3加速度计的技术变异性。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Oct;35(10):1773-8. doi: 10.1249/01.MSS.0000089341.68754.BA.

本文引用的文献

1
Is the difference real, is the difference relevant: the minimal detectable and clinically important changes in the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.差异是真实存在的吗,差异有意义吗:蒙特利尔认知评估中的最小可检测变化及临床重要变化
Cereb Circ Cogn Behav. 2024 May 3;6:100222. doi: 10.1016/j.cccb.2024.100222. eCollection 2024.
2
Validation of physical activity levels from shank-placed Axivity AX6 accelerometers in older adults.老年人胫骨放置式 Axivity AX6 加速度计的体力活动水平验证。
PLoS One. 2024 May 13;19(5):e0290912. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290912. eCollection 2024.
3
Accelerometer-derived physical activity and the risk of death, heart failure, and stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective study from UK Biobank.
加速度计测量的身体活动与房颤患者死亡、心力衰竭和中风风险的相关性:来自英国生物银行的前瞻性研究。
Br J Sports Med. 2024 Apr 2;58(8):427-434. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-106862.
4
Accelerometer Metrics: Healthy Adult Reference Values, Associations with Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Clinical Implications.加速度计指标:健康成年人参考值、与心肺适能的关系及临床意义。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2024 Feb 1;56(2):170-180. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000003299. Epub 2023 Sep 12.
5
Physical Activity Assessed by Wrist and Thigh Worn Accelerometry and Associations with Cardiometabolic Health.腕部和大腿佩戴加速度计评估的身体活动与心脏代谢健康的关系。
Sensors (Basel). 2023 Aug 23;23(17):7353. doi: 10.3390/s23177353.
6
Accelerometry-based assessment of physical activity and sedentary behavior in adult survivors of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia and their healthy peers.基于加速度计的儿童期急性淋巴细胞白血病成年幸存者及其健康同龄人的身体活动和久坐行为评估。
Sci Rep. 2023 May 8;13(1):7439. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-34689-5.
7
Suitability of a Low-Cost Wearable Sensor to Assess Turning in Healthy Adults.低成本可穿戴传感器评估健康成年人转身活动的适用性。
Sensors (Basel). 2022 Nov 30;22(23):9322. doi: 10.3390/s22239322.
8
Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research: 2022 Update.体育与运动科学研究中的伦理标准:2022年更新
Int J Sports Med. 2022 Dec;43(13):1065-1070. doi: 10.1055/a-1957-2356. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
9
Objective Measurement of 24-Hour Movement Behaviors in Preschool Children Using Wrist-Worn and Thigh-Worn Accelerometers.使用腕戴和大腿戴加速度计客观测量学龄前儿童 24 小时运动行为。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 8;18(18):9482. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189482.
10
Accelerometer-assessed Physical Activity in Epidemiology: Are Monitors Equivalent?加速度计评估流行病学中的身体活动:监测器等效吗?
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Feb;50(2):257-265. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001435.