Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, 9000 Ghent, Belgium.
Research Foundation Flanders, 1000 Brussels, Belgium.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 8;18(18):9482. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18189482.
In recent years, more attention has been paid towards the study of 24-h movement behaviors (including physical activity (PA), sedentary behavior (SB) and sleep) in preschoolers instead of studying these behaviors in isolation. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of using wrist- vs. thigh-worn accelerometers and to report accelerometer-derived metrics of 24-h movement behaviors in preschoolers. A convenience sample of 16 preschoolers (50.0% boys, 4.35 years) and one of their parents were recruited for this study. Preschoolers had to wear the ActivPAL accelerometer (attached to the upper thigh) and Axivity accelerometer (using a wrist band) simultaneously for 7 consecutive days and for 24 h a day. Parents completed an acceptability survey. In total, 16 preschoolers (100.0%) had a minimum of 6 days of valid wrist-worn data, while only 10 preschoolers (62.5%) had a minimum of 6 days of valid thigh-worn data ( = 0.002). When looking at the acceptability, 81.3% of parents indicated that it was easy for their child to wear the Axivity for 7 consecutive days, and 93.8% of parents indicated so for the ActivPAL ( = 0.88). However, some parents stated that the wristband of the Axivity accelerometer was big, which might have affected data collection. Significant differences were found for the measurement of total volume of PA, SB and sleep across 24 h. Total PA was 464.44 min/day (±64.00) with the ActivPAL compared with 354.94 min/day (±57.46) with the Axivity ( < 0.001). The volume of SB was 290.94 min/day (±55.05) with the ActivPAL compared with 440.50 min/day (±50.01) with the Axivity ( < 0.001). The total volume of sleep was also significantly different between both devices ( = 0.001; ActivPAL: 684.63 min/day ± 51.96; Axivity: 645.69 min/day ± 46.78). Overall, parents perceived both devices to be feasible to use for preschoolers. However, future studies are required to validate both devices for the measurement of preschoolers' 24-h movement behaviors since significant differences in the classification of PA, SB and sleep were found in this small sample.
近年来,人们越来越关注学龄前儿童 24 小时运动行为(包括体力活动(PA)、久坐行为(SB)和睡眠)的研究,而不是单独研究这些行为。本研究旨在评估腕部和大腿佩戴加速度计的可行性,并报告学龄前儿童 24 小时运动行为的加速度计衍生指标。本研究招募了 16 名学龄前儿童(50.0%为男孩,4.35 岁)及其一名家长作为研究对象。研究要求学龄前儿童连续 7 天、每天 24 小时同时佩戴 ActivPAL 加速度计(附在大腿上)和 Axivity 加速度计(使用腕带)。家长完成了一份可接受性调查。总共有 16 名(100.0%)学龄前儿童至少有 6 天的有效腕部佩戴数据,而只有 10 名(62.5%)学龄前儿童有至少 6 天的有效大腿佩戴数据(= 0.002)。从可接受性来看,81.3%的家长表示他们的孩子连续佩戴 Axivity 7 天非常容易,93.8%的家长表示佩戴 ActivPAL 非常容易(= 0.88)。然而,一些家长表示 Axivity 加速度计的腕带太大,这可能影响了数据收集。在 24 小时内,PA、SB 和睡眠的总时长存在显著差异。使用 ActivPAL 测量的总 PA 为 464.44 分钟/天(±64.00),而使用 Axivity 测量的总 PA 为 354.94 分钟/天(±57.46)(<0.001)。使用 ActivPAL 测量的 SB 总时长为 290.94 分钟/天(±55.05),而使用 Axivity 测量的 SB 总时长为 440.50 分钟/天(±50.01)(<0.001)。两种设备测量的总睡眠时间也存在显著差异(= 0.001;ActivPAL:684.63 分钟/天±51.96;Axivity:645.69 分钟/天±46.78)。总的来说,家长认为两种设备都适合学龄前儿童使用。然而,由于在这个小样本中发现了 PA、SB 和睡眠的分类存在显著差异,因此需要进一步的研究来验证这两种设备对学龄前儿童 24 小时运动行为的测量。