Abernethy D R, Schwartz J B, Todd E L
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985 Sep;38(3):342-9. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1985.183.
Nine healthy normal subjects received verapamil, 10 mg iv, before (control) and during cimetidine dosing (300 mg every 6 hours), and verapamil, 120 mg po, twice in the same manner. After intravenous doses, the t1/2 (means +/- SE: control, 3.60 +/- 0.40 hours; cimetidine trial, 4.30 +/- 0.60 hours), volume of distribution (5.8 +/- 0.6 vs. 6.6 +/- 0.9 L/kg), and total clearance (19.2 +/- 1.5 vs. 18.4 +/- 1.6 ml/min/kg) did not change during cimetidine dosing. After oral doses, the t1/2 (4.25 +/- 0.57 vs. 4.60 +/- 0.70 hours), plasma AUC (585 +/- 113 vs. 506 +/- 82 ng/ml X hr) and absolute bioavailability (35% +/- 7% vs. 30% +/- 5%) did not differ between control and cimetidine trials, respectively. Five of the subjects also received lidocaine, 25 mg iv, once in the control state and once during the cimetidine regimen described above. Lidocaine clearance fell (665 +/- 216 vs. 527 +/- 134 ml/min; P less than 0.05) during cimetidine therapy, resulting in a trend toward a longer t1/2 (1.81 +/- 0.41 vs. 2.44 +/- 0.42 hours; 0.1 greater than P greater than 0.05) with no change in volume of distribution (1.77 +/- 0.66 vs. 1.99 +/- 0.81 L/kg). Verapamil pharmacodynamics (ECG PR interval, blood pressure, and heart rate) were evaluated after intravenous doses. A decrease in mean arterial pressure (8 +/- 1 vs. 9 +/- 2 mm Hg) and a reflex increase in heart rate (14 +/- 3 vs. 17 +/- 2 bpm) were no different in the control and cimetidine trials.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)