Martín-Sánchez Rafael, Castro Villamor Miguel Á, Rabanales-Soto Joseba, Otero de la Torre Santiago, Martínez Fernández Francisco T, Sánchez Soberón Irene, Sanz-García Ancor, Martín-Rodríguez Francisco
Advanced Life Support, Emergency Medical Services (SACYL), Valladolid, Spain; Faculty of Nursing, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain; Valladolid Rural II Health Center (SACYL), Valladolid, Spain.
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Apr 21;94:103-109. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.04.039.
The aim of this study was to determine the delta anxiety index (pre- and post-simulation) of medical students performing prehospital critical care high-fidelity clinical simulations (sepsis, myocardial infarction, polytrauma and anaphylactic shock) case-by-case. The secondary outcome was to identify clinical scenarios resulting in extreme anxiety levels (> 25 % post-simulation vs. pre-simulation delta anxiety).
A randomized (four prehospital critical care cases), blind, simulation-based clinical trial was performed at the Advanced Clinical Simulation Center of the Medical School of Valladolid University (Spain) with the participation of volunteer last-year medical students (6th year) from September 20, 2022, to April 15, 2024. The STAI questionnaire, epidemiological data and lifestyle habits were assessed. The principal outcome was the delta anxiety level (pre- and post-simulation) on the state subscale of the STAI.
A total of 342 participants met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 23 years (IQR: 23-24; range: 22-41), and 67.8 % were female (213 cases). Scenario-by-scenario analysis revealed no significant differences by sex, age, prior simulation training, or role in the simulated scenario (leader or assistant). The polytrauma scenario yielded the worst post-simulation evaluation on the state subscale of the STAI, with a median of 54 points (IQR: 46-66) (p < 0.001).
Polytrauma and anaphylactic shock scenarios are more likely to induce extreme anxiety levels in final-year medical students during high-fidelity clinical simulations. Educators must be aware of these potential anxiety levels and carefully design the scenarios, providing adequate preparation and facilitating effective debriefing to optimize learning and mitigate the negative effects of excessive anxiety.
本研究的目的是逐案确定进行院前重症监护高保真临床模拟(脓毒症、心肌梗死、多发伤和过敏性休克)的医学生的焦虑指数变化(模拟前和模拟后)。次要结果是确定导致极度焦虑水平的临床场景(模拟后与模拟前焦虑指数变化>25%)。
在西班牙巴利亚多利德大学医学院高级临床模拟中心进行了一项随机(四个院前重症监护病例)、盲法、基于模拟的临床试验,志愿者为该校最后一年(六年级)的医学生,时间从2022年9月20日至2024年4月15日。评估了状态-特质焦虑问卷(STAI)、流行病学数据和生活习惯。主要结果是STAI状态分量表上的焦虑指数变化(模拟前和模拟后)。
共有342名参与者符合纳入标准。中位年龄为23岁(四分位间距:23 - 24岁;范围:22 - 41岁),67.8%为女性(213例)。逐个场景分析显示,在性别、年龄、先前的模拟训练或在模拟场景中的角色(领导者或助手)方面无显著差异。多发伤场景在STAI状态分量表上的模拟后评估结果最差,中位数为54分(四分位间距:46 - 66分)(p < 0.001)。
在高保真临床模拟中,多发伤和过敏性休克场景更有可能在最后一年的医学生中诱发极度焦虑水平。教育工作者必须意识到这些潜在的焦虑水平,并仔细设计场景,提供充分的准备并促进有效的总结汇报,以优化学习并减轻过度焦虑的负面影响。