• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共情的力量:改善慢性伤口护理的愈合效果。

The power of empathy: Enhancing healing outcomes in chronic wound care.

作者信息

Probst Sebastian, Ryan Hayley, Tehan Peta

机构信息

Tissue Viability and Wound Care, Geneva School of Health Sciences, HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland, Geneva, Switzerland; Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland; Medical Faculty, University of Geneva, Switzerland; College of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland; School of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton Campus, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

School of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

J Tissue Viability. 2025 Apr 12;34(3):100911. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100911.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100911
PMID:40288022
Abstract

AIM

This study explores the impact of healthcare providers' empathy on patients' healing outcomes and satisfaction in chronic wound care.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A qualitative descriptive approach was used. Ten adults with chronic wounds were recruited through purposive sampling. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in January 2025, lasting an average of 37.1 min. Data were transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically using Braun and Clarke's six-phase framework. Rigor was ensured through systematic coding, researcher triangulation, and adherence to COREQ guidelines.

RESULTS

The analysis identified three central themes: (1) The need for person-centered and consistent care, emphasizing the importance of continuity in healthcare providers to reduce emotional exhaustion and improve adherence; (2) The emotional impact of empathy in wound care, demonstrating that empathetic communication raises trust, decreases pain perception, and enhances psychological resilience; and (3) The role of communication, trust, and cultural awareness, highlighting that clear explanations and cultural competence improve patient satisfaction and engagement. Participants who felt listened to and involved in decision-making reported better motivation and adherence to treatment.

CONCLUSION

Empathy is an important component of effective wound care, influencing healing outcomes, psychological well-being, and treatment adherence. Integrating empathy into clinical practice through continuity of care, shared decision-making, and cultural competence can improve patient satisfaction and overall wound management. Healthcare systems should prioritize training and policies that support empathy-driven, person-centered care.

摘要

目的

本研究探讨医疗服务提供者的同理心对慢性伤口护理中患者愈合结果和满意度的影响。

材料与方法

采用定性描述性方法。通过目的抽样招募了10名患有慢性伤口的成年人。2025年1月进行了半结构化访谈,平均持续37.1分钟。数据逐字转录,并使用布劳恩和克拉克的六阶段框架进行主题分析。通过系统编码、研究者三角互证和遵循COREQ指南确保严谨性。

结果

分析确定了三个核心主题:(1)以患者为中心和持续护理的需求,强调医疗服务提供者连续性的重要性,以减少情感耗竭并提高依从性;(2)同理心在伤口护理中的情感影响,表明同理心沟通能提高信任、降低疼痛感知并增强心理复原力;(3)沟通、信任和文化意识的作用,强调清晰的解释和文化能力可提高患者满意度和参与度。感到被倾听并参与决策的参与者报告有更好的治疗动机和依从性。

结论

同理心是有效伤口护理的重要组成部分,影响愈合结果、心理健康和治疗依从性。通过护理连续性、共同决策和文化能力将同理心融入临床实践可提高患者满意度和整体伤口管理水平。医疗系统应优先考虑支持以同理心为驱动、以患者为中心的护理的培训和政策。

相似文献

1
The power of empathy: Enhancing healing outcomes in chronic wound care.共情的力量:改善慢性伤口护理的愈合效果。
J Tissue Viability. 2025 Apr 12;34(3):100911. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100911.
2
Healing beyond the surface: Empathy's role in chronic wound care a qualitative study.超越表面的愈合:共情在慢性伤口护理中的作用——一项定性研究
J Tissue Viability. 2025 Apr 12;34(3):100910. doi: 10.1016/j.jtv.2025.100910.
3
Accreditation through the eyes of nurse managers: an infinite staircase or a phenomenon that evaporates like water.护士长眼中的认证:是无尽的阶梯还是如流水般消逝的现象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2025-0029.
4
The experience of adults who choose watchful waiting or active surveillance as an approach to medical treatment: a qualitative systematic review.选择观察等待或主动监测作为治疗方法的成年人的经历:一项定性系统评价。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Feb;14(2):174-255. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2016-2270.
5
Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations.为医疗服务提供者提供的干预措施,以促进临床会诊中以患者为中心的方法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD003267. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003267.pub2.
6
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.我们能否加强髋臼周围截骨术的共同决策?一项关于患者体验的定性研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
7
Navigating artificial intelligence in home healthcare: challenges and opportunities in nursing wound care.在家居医疗保健中运用人工智能:护理伤口护理的挑战与机遇
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jun 19;24(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03348-7.
8
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.消费者和卫生服务提供者对合作改善卫生服务设计、提供和评估的看法和认知:一项共同制定的定性证据综合研究。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 14;3(3):CD013274. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013274.pub2.
9
A qualitative interview study exploring patients' views and experiences of treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa in the UK.一项定性访谈研究,探讨英国化脓性汗腺炎患者对治疗的看法和经历。
Br J Dermatol. 2025 Jun 20;193(1):85-92. doi: 10.1093/bjd/ljaf046.
10
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The Role of Communication in Managing Chronic Lower Limb Wounds.沟通在慢性下肢伤口管理中的作用
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2025 Jun 25;18:3685-3708. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S533416. eCollection 2025.