Karnehed Sara, Larsson Ingrid, Petersson Lena, Erlandsson Lena-Karin, Tyskbo Daniel
School of Health & Welfare, Halmstad University, Halmstad, Sweden.
BMC Nurs. 2025 Jun 19;24(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03348-7.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly introduced into healthcare, promising improved efficiency and clinical decision-making. While research has mainly focused on AI in hospital settings and physician perspectives, less is known about how AI may challenge the values that guide nursing practices. This study explores nurses' perceptions of wound care in municipal home healthcare and the opportunities and challenges with the integration of AI technologies into their practices.
An exploratory qualitative study using semi-structured interviews was conducted with 14 registered nurses from two municipalities in Sweden. Participants were recruited through purposive sampling, and data were collected through individual interviews, either in person or via video call. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and analyzed inductively, inspired by the Gioia methodology. This approach allowed themes to emerge from the data while maintaining close alignment with participants' perspectives. In a subsequent phase, the data were interpreted through the lens of Mol's Logic of Care to deepen understanding of the relational, embodied, and adaptive nature of wound care. Ethical approval was obtained, and the study adhered to the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ).
Three interconnected dimensions emerged from the data: relational, embodied, and adaptive practices. Nurses emphasized the importance of relational work in wound care, highlighting the trust and continuity necessary for effective wound care, which AI-driven automation might overlook. Embodied practices, such as sensory engagement through touch, sight, and smell, were central to wound care, raising nurses' concerns about AI's ability to replicate these nuanced judgments. Adaptive practices, including improvisation and situational awareness in non-standardized home environments, were presented as challenges for AI integration, as existing digital systems were perceived as rigid and often increased administrative burdens rather than streamlining care.
Home healthcare nurses' perspectives highlight the complex interplay between technology and caregiving. While AI could support documentation and diagnostic processes, its current limitations in relational, sensory, and adaptive aspects raised the nurses' concerns about its suitability for wound care in home settings. Successful AI integration should account for the realities of nursing practice, ensuring that technological tools enhance the embodied, relational, and adaptive dimensions of wound care. Applying Mol's Logic of Care helps illuminate how good care emerges through ongoing, situated practices that resist full automation. Future research could further explore how AI aligns with professional nursing values and decision-making in real-world care settings.
Not applicable.
人工智能(AI)越来越多地被引入医疗保健领域,有望提高效率和改善临床决策。虽然研究主要集中在医院环境中的人工智能以及医生的观点,但对于人工智能如何挑战指导护理实践的价值观却知之甚少。本研究探讨了护士对市政家庭医疗保健中伤口护理的看法,以及将人工智能技术融入其实践中的机遇和挑战。
对瑞典两个市政当局的14名注册护士进行了一项使用半结构化访谈的探索性定性研究。通过目的抽样招募参与者,并通过个人访谈(亲自或通过视频通话)收集数据。访谈逐字转录并采用归纳法进行分析,灵感来自乔亚方法。这种方法使主题能够从数据中浮现出来,同时与参与者的观点保持紧密一致。在随后的阶段,通过莫尔的护理逻辑视角对数据进行解释,以加深对伤口护理的关系性、具体性和适应性本质的理解。获得了伦理批准,并且该研究遵循了定性研究报告的综合标准(COREQ)。
数据中出现了三个相互关联的维度:关系性实践、具体性实践和适应性实践。护士强调了伤口护理中关系性工作的重要性,强调了有效伤口护理所需的信任和连续性,而人工智能驱动的自动化可能会忽视这一点。具体性实践,如通过触摸、视觉和嗅觉进行感官参与,是伤口护理的核心,这引发了护士对人工智能复制这些细微判断能力的担忧。适应性实践,包括在非标准化家庭环境中的即兴发挥和情境意识,被认为是人工智能集成的挑战,因为现有的数字系统被认为是僵化的,并且往往增加了行政负担而不是简化护理。
家庭医疗保健护士的观点凸显了技术与护理之间复杂的相互作用。虽然人工智能可以支持文档记录和诊断过程,但其目前在关系性、感官性和适应性方面的局限性引发了护士对其在家庭环境中伤口护理适用性的担忧。成功的人工智能集成应考虑到护理实践的实际情况,确保技术工具增强伤口护理的具体性、关系性和适应性维度。应用莫尔的护理逻辑有助于阐明良好的护理是如何通过持续的、具体情境下的实践产生的,这些实践抵制完全自动化。未来的研究可以进一步探索人工智能在现实世界护理环境中如何与专业护理价值观和决策保持一致。
不适用。