• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

安全网医院急诊科的丙型肝炎检测及与医疗服务的联系

Hepatitis C testing and linkage to care in a safety-net hospital emergency department.

作者信息

Lue Nicole, Lom Jennifer, Manguso Elizabeth, Park Brandi, Palacio Andres, Darby Rapheisha, Shah Bijal, Yaffee Anna, Miller Lesley

机构信息

Emory University School of Medicine, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

Division of General Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Aug;94:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.04.046. Epub 2025 Apr 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2025.04.046
PMID:40288326
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In 2020, the CDC expanded hepatitis C (HCV) screening recommendations to include universal screening for persons 18 and older. We implemented universal screening in the emergency department (ED) within a safety-net health system. We aimed to measure HCV prevalence and linkage to care (LTC) outcomes in the ED and compare them to the outpatient clinics within the same health system.

METHODS

Patients aged 18-79 without HCV qualified for screening. We measured prevalence of both anti-HCV+ (exposure) and HCV RNA+ (active infection). Those with active HCV were flagged for LTC and their charts were followed for outcomes. HCV prevalence and LTC in the ED were compared to those in outpatient clinics over the same time.

RESULTS

9511 patients were screened for HCV from 2019 to 2022 in the ED. 6.9 % (659) were anti-HCV+. 54.9 % (320 of 582) of anti-HCV+ individuals or 3.4 % of those screened (320 of 9511) were HCV RNA+. The LTC rate was 24.1 % (77 of 320) and a total of 56 individuals (17.8 % of all HCV RNA+ ED patients, 72.7 % of those linked) initiated treatment. HCV prevalence was higher in the ED compared to the outpatient clinic setting. Demographics and LTC rates also significantly differed between these two cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a higher HCV prevalence in the ED relative to the outpatient clinic setting and significant need for improvement in LTC and HCV treatment initiation. Our findings suggest universal screening is an important tool to diagnose HCV infections but may require novel strategies for improved LTC and treatment initiation.

摘要

背景与目的

2020年,美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)扩大了丙型肝炎(HCV)筛查建议,将18岁及以上人群的普遍筛查纳入其中。我们在一个安全网医疗系统的急诊科(ED)实施了普遍筛查。我们旨在测量急诊科丙型肝炎病毒的流行率以及与护理的联系(LTC)结果,并将其与同一医疗系统内的门诊诊所进行比较。

方法

年龄在18 - 79岁且无丙型肝炎病毒的患者符合筛查条件。我们测量了抗HCV +(接触)和HCV RNA +(活动性感染)的流行率。那些患有活动性丙型肝炎病毒的患者被标记为接受长期护理,并跟踪他们的病历以获取结果。将急诊科的丙型肝炎病毒流行率和长期护理情况与同期门诊诊所的情况进行比较。

结果

2019年至2022年期间,急诊科对9511名患者进行了丙型肝炎病毒筛查。6.9%(659名)为抗HCV +。抗HCV +个体中有54.9%(582名中的320名)或筛查人群的3.4%(9511名中的320名)为HCV RNA +。长期护理率为24.1%(320名中的77名),共有56人(占所有HCV RNA +急诊科患者的17.8%,占接受长期护理患者的72.7%)开始治疗。与门诊诊所相比,急诊科的丙型肝炎病毒流行率更高。这两个队列的人口统计学特征和长期护理率也存在显著差异。

结论

我们发现急诊科的丙型肝炎病毒流行率高于门诊诊所,并且在长期护理和丙型肝炎病毒治疗启动方面有显著的改进需求。我们的研究结果表明,普遍筛查是诊断丙型肝炎病毒感染的重要工具,但可能需要新的策略来改善长期护理和治疗启动。

相似文献

1
Hepatitis C testing and linkage to care in a safety-net hospital emergency department.安全网医院急诊科的丙型肝炎检测及与医疗服务的联系
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Aug;94:133-139. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.04.046. Epub 2025 Apr 21.
2
Linkage-to-care Methods and Rates in U.S. Emergency Department-based HIV Testing Programs: A Systematic Literature Review Brief Report.美国急诊科艾滋病毒检测项目中的护理联系方法与比率:系统文献综述简要报告
Acad Emerg Med. 2016 Jul;23(7):835-42. doi: 10.1111/acem.12987.
3
NIH Consensus Statement on Management of Hepatitis C: 2002.美国国立卫生研究院关于丙型肝炎管理的共识声明:2002年。
NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2002;19(3):1-46.
4
Blood transfusions in the emergency department: A descriptive analysis and referral patterns at a non-trauma center.急诊科的输血情况:非创伤中心的描述性分析及转诊模式
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Aug;94:153-157. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2025.04.035. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Adefovir dipivoxil and pegylated interferon alfa-2a for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B: a systematic review and economic evaluation.阿德福韦酯与聚乙二醇化干扰素α-2a治疗慢性乙型肝炎:系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Aug;10(28):iii-iv, xi-xiv, 1-183. doi: 10.3310/hta10280.
7
Pharmacological interventions for acute hepatitis C infection: an attempted network meta-analysis.急性丙型肝炎感染的药物干预:一项网状Meta分析尝试
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 13;3(3):CD011644. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011644.pub2.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
9
Peginterferon alfa and ribavirin for chronic hepatitis C in patients eligible for shortened treatment, re-treatment or in HCV/HIV co-infection: a systematic review and economic evaluation.聚乙二醇干扰素 α 和利巴韦林治疗适合缩短疗程、再治疗或合并 HCV/HIV 感染的慢性丙型肝炎患者:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2011 Apr;15(17):i-xii, 1-210. doi: 10.3310/hta15170.
10
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.