Smith Hannah, Cooper Susan, Keh Ryan Yann Shern, Gosal David, Lavin Tim
Manchester Centre for Clinical Neuroscience, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK.
Muscle Nerve. 2025 Jul;72(1):134-138. doi: 10.1002/mus.28421. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) is available as vials or pre-filled syringes (PFS) and can be administered via pump or manual push to treat inflammatory neuropathies, such as chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy (CIDP). There are limited data on PFS-SCIG manual push in this population, and this administration method may be perceived as challenging as large volumes of SCIG are required for immunomodulation. Here, we evaluated the feasibility of PFS-manual push SCIG in patients with inflammatory neuropathies.
Patients with inflammatory neuropathies receiving immunoglobulin therapy in a single center were identified via the National Immunoglobulin Database. Case notes were retrospectively evaluated for patient characteristics and immunoglobulin use data.
Thirty-six patients with inflammatory neuropathies being treated with PFS-SCIG were identified (CIDP: n = 29; multifocal motor neuropathy: n = 2; other: n = 5). Overall, 27 patients initiated SCIG with PFS-manual push. The remaining patients initiated SCIG with PFS-pump administration but, during the study, most (n = 7) switched to PFS-manual push, while one switched from PFS-manual push to PFS-pump. Five patients experienced adverse events, mostly associated with infusion-site swelling that could be managed by reducing infusion rates. Patient perception of PFS-manual push was positive, with multiple patients commenting on its convenience.
PFS-manual push SCIG appeared to be feasible and generally well-tolerated in patients with inflammatory neuropathies. Further studies should confirm PFS-SCIG manual push as a viable option for patients with inflammatory neuropathies and explore whether PFS might enhance treatment satisfaction and quality of life.
引言/目的:皮下注射免疫球蛋白(SCIG)有小瓶制剂或预充式注射器(PFS)两种剂型,可通过泵注或手动推注的方式给药,用于治疗炎性神经病,如慢性炎性脱髓鞘性多发性神经根神经病(CIDP)。关于该人群使用预充式注射器手动推注SCIG的数据有限,而且由于免疫调节需要大量的SCIG,这种给药方式可能具有挑战性。在此,我们评估了预充式注射器手动推注SCIG在炎性神经病患者中的可行性。
通过国家免疫球蛋白数据库识别在单一中心接受免疫球蛋白治疗的炎性神经病患者。对病历进行回顾性评估,以获取患者特征和免疫球蛋白使用数据。
共识别出36例接受预充式注射器SCIG治疗的炎性神经病患者(CIDP:29例;多灶性运动神经病:2例;其他:5例)。总体而言,27例患者开始采用预充式注射器手动推注SCIG治疗。其余患者开始采用预充式注射器泵注SCIG治疗,但在研究期间,大多数患者(7例)改为预充式注射器手动推注,而有1例从预充式注射器手动推注改为预充式注射器泵注。5例患者出现不良事件,主要与输注部位肿胀有关,可通过降低输注速度来处理。患者对预充式注射器手动推注的接受度较高,多名患者提到了其便利性。
预充式注射器手动推注SCIG在炎性神经病患者中似乎是可行的,且一般耐受性良好。进一步的研究应证实预充式注射器手动推注SCIG是炎性神经病患者的一种可行选择,并探讨预充式注射器是否可以提高治疗满意度和生活质量。