• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

与未参与健康认知衰老项目相关的因素。

Factors associated with non-participation in the Healthy Cognitive Ageing Project.

作者信息

Assaad Sarah, Hayat Shabina, Brayne Carol, Zaninotto Paola, Steptoe Andrew

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.

Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health Care, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Apr;21(4):e70169. doi: 10.1002/alz.70169.

DOI:10.1002/alz.70169
PMID:40289680
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12034936/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Understanding cognitive decline trajectories is crucial for dementia prevention, as many cases go undetected. Identifying participation biases in such studies is essential for data validity.

METHODS

We examined non-participation correlates in the Healthy Cognitive Ageing Project (HCAP), a sub-study of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA). We compared sociodemographic and health characteristics of invited, interviewed, and non-interviewed individuals, and assessed the impact of sample weights.

RESULTS

Of 1778 ELSA members invited in 2018, 1273 (72%) participated. Participants were similar to the invited sample in sociodemographics but were younger, had fewer daily living difficulties, and had better cognition. Non-participation was linked to difficulties in daily living (odds ratio 1.78), dementia (1.55), and psychiatric conditions (1.34). Weighted analyses highlighted differences in disability and cognition.

DISCUSSION

Non-participation in cognitive studies is not random, lowering response and retention rates, and requiring adjustments to data analysis beyond the use of weights.

HIGHLIGHTS

We compared the sociodemographics of invited, interviewed, and non-interviewed individuals. We used sample weights to assess differences in participants' characteristics. We found non-participation linked to daily living difficulties, dementia, and psychiatric conditions.

摘要

背景

了解认知衰退轨迹对于痴呆症预防至关重要,因为许多病例未被发现。识别此类研究中的参与偏差对于数据有效性至关重要。

方法

我们在健康认知老龄化项目(HCAP)中研究了不参与的相关因素,该项目是英国老龄化纵向研究(ELSA)的一项子研究。我们比较了受邀、接受访谈和未接受访谈个体的社会人口统计学和健康特征,并评估了样本权重的影响。

结果

在2018年受邀的1778名ELSA成员中,1273人(72%)参与了研究。参与者在社会人口统计学方面与受邀样本相似,但更年轻,日常生活困难更少,认知能力更好。不参与与日常生活困难(优势比1.78)、痴呆症(1.55)和精神疾病(1.34)有关。加权分析突出了残疾和认知方面的差异。

讨论

不参与认知研究并非随机现象,这会降低应答率和留存率,并且除了使用权重之外,还需要对数据分析进行调整。

要点

我们比较了受邀、接受访谈和未接受访谈个体的社会人口统计学特征。我们使用样本权重来评估参与者特征的差异。我们发现不参与与日常生活困难、痴呆症和精神疾病有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c1f/12034936/cc80ce22720d/ALZ-21-e70169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c1f/12034936/567795f02e28/ALZ-21-e70169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c1f/12034936/cc80ce22720d/ALZ-21-e70169-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c1f/12034936/567795f02e28/ALZ-21-e70169-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c1f/12034936/cc80ce22720d/ALZ-21-e70169-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Factors associated with non-participation in the Healthy Cognitive Ageing Project.与未参与健康认知衰老项目相关的因素。
Alzheimers Dement. 2025 Apr;21(4):e70169. doi: 10.1002/alz.70169.
2
Community engagement and dementia risk: time-to-event analyses from a national cohort study.社区参与与痴呆风险:一项全国队列研究的时依事件分析。
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020 Jan;74(1):71-77. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213029. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
3
Third follow-up of the Cardiovascular Risk Factors, Aging and Dementia (CAIDE) cohort investigating determinants of cognitive, physical, and psychosocial wellbeing among the oldest old: the CAIDE85+ study protocol.第三轮心血管风险因素、衰老和痴呆(CAIDE)队列研究,旨在调查最年长人群认知、身体和心理社会健康的决定因素:CAIDE85+研究方案。
BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jul 10;20(1):238. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01617-5.
4
Investigating the prevalence of cognitive impairment and dementia in the Northern Ireland Cohort for the Longitudinal Study of Ageing (NICOLA): the Harmonised Cognitive Assessment Protocol (HCAP) cross-sectional substudy.调查北爱尔兰纵向老龄化研究队列(NICOLA)中认知障碍和痴呆的患病率:协调认知评估方案(HCAP)横断面子研究。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jan 31;14(1):e075672. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075672.
5
Impact of functional level on cognitive function in adults aged 45 and older than 45 years in the Korean Longitudinal Study of Aging.在韩国老年纵向研究中,功能水平对45岁及以上成年人认知功能的影响。
Australas J Ageing. 2025 Mar;44(1):e70014. doi: 10.1111/ajag.70014.
6
Assessment of functional change and cognitive correlates in the progression from healthy cognitive aging to dementia.从健康认知衰老到痴呆症进展过程中的功能变化及认知关联评估。
Neuropsychology. 2014 Nov;28(6):881-93. doi: 10.1037/neu0000109. Epub 2014 Jun 16.
7
A Comparative Study of Pathological Outcomes in The University of Manchester Longitudinal Study of Cognition in Normal Healthy Old Age and Brains for Dementia Research Cohorts.《曼彻斯特大学正常健康老年人群认知纵向研究与痴呆症研究队列的病理结果比较研究》
J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;73(2):619-632. doi: 10.3233/JAD-190580.
8
The Health and Retirement Study Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol Project: Study Design and Methods.健康与退休研究协调认知评估协议项目:研究设计与方法。
Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(1):64-74. doi: 10.1159/000503004. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
9
Mobility-Based Smartphone Digital Phenotypes for Unobtrusively Capturing Everyday Cognition, Mood, and Community Life-Space in Older Adults: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Preliminary Validity Study.基于移动性的智能手机数字特征可在不干扰老年人日常认知、情绪和社区生活空间的情况下进行捕捉:可行性、可接受性和初步有效性研究。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Nov 22;11:e59974. doi: 10.2196/59974.
10
Visual and hearing impairments are associated with cognitive decline in older people.视力和听力障碍与老年人认知能力下降有关。
Age Ageing. 2018 Jul 1;47(4):575-581. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afy061.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparing the sociodemographic characteristics of participants and non-participants in the population-based Tromsø Study.比较基于人群的特罗姆瑟研究中参与者和非参与者的社会人口特征。
BMC Public Health. 2023 May 29;23(1):994. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15928-w.
2
Differences in the measurement of cognition for the assessment of dementia across geographic contexts: Recommendations for cross-national research.不同地理环境下痴呆评估认知测量的差异:跨国研究建议。
Alzheimers Dement. 2023 Mar;19(3):1009-1019. doi: 10.1002/alz.12740. Epub 2022 Jul 16.
3
Estimation of the global prevalence of dementia in 2019 and forecasted prevalence in 2050: an analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.
2019 年全球痴呆症患病率估计及 2050 年预测患病率:2019 年全球疾病负担研究分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2022 Feb;7(2):e105-e125. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(21)00249-8. Epub 2022 Jan 6.
4
Participation bias, self-selection bias, and response bias.参与偏倚、自我选择偏倚和应答偏倚。
J Am Acad Dermatol. 2021 Jun 18. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2021.06.025.
5
Cohort Profile Update: The Harmonised Cognitive Assessment Protocol Sub-study of the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA-HCAP).队列简介更新:英国老龄化纵向研究的统一认知评估协议子研究(ELSA-HCAP)
Int J Epidemiol. 2021 Jul 9;50(3):725-726i. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyaa227.
6
Design and Methodology of the Longitudinal Aging Study in India-Diagnostic Assessment of Dementia (LASI-DAD).《印度纵向老龄化研究-痴呆诊断评估(LASI-DAD)》的设计与方法学。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Aug;68 Suppl 3(Suppl 3):S5-S10. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16737.
7
The Mexican Cognitive Aging Ancillary Study (Mex-Cog): Study Design and Methods.墨西哥认知衰老辅助研究(Mex-Cog):研究设计与方法
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Nov/Dec;91:104210. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104210. Epub 2020 Jul 27.
8
Prevalence and Severity of Hearing Loss in the Older Old Population.老年人群听力损失的流行率和严重程度。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 Aug 1;146(8):762-763. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0900.
9
The Health and Retirement Study Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol Project: Study Design and Methods.健康与退休研究协调认知评估协议项目:研究设计与方法。
Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(1):64-74. doi: 10.1159/000503004. Epub 2019 Sep 27.
10
The association between medication non-adherence and adverse health outcomes in ageing populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis.老龄化人群中药物不依从与不良健康结局的关系:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Nov;85(11):2464-2478. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14075. Epub 2019 Sep 6.