Suppr超能文献

用于流感和呼吸道合胞病毒检测的口鼻标本采集的验证

Validation of oral-nasal specimen collection for influenza and respiratory syncytial virus detection.

作者信息

Young Matthew, Suico Yuri, Vojdani Omid Kyle, McCready Janine, Katz Kevin, Pourmatin Scarlett, Rahimi Manija, Vermeiren Christie, Powis Jeff, Kandel Christopher

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Michael Garron Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

出版信息

Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 23;5(1):e99. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.66. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Respiratory virus testing is routinely performed and ways to obtain specimens aside from a nasopharyngeal swab are needed for pandemic preparedness. The main objective is to validate a self-collected oral-nasal swab for the detection of Influenza and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV).

DESIGN

Diagnostic test validation of a self-collected oral nasal swab as compared to a provider-collected nasopharyngeal swab.

SETTING

Emergency Department at Michael Garron Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Consecutive individuals who presented to the Emergency Department with a suspected viral upper respiratory tract infection were included if they self-collected an oral-nasal swab. Individuals testing positive for Influenza or RSV along with randomly selected participants who tested negative were eligible for inclusion.

INTERVENTIONS

All participants had the paired oral-nasal swab tested using a multiplex respiratory virus polymerase chain reaction for the three respiratory pathogens and compared to the nasopharyngeal swab.

RESULTS

48 individuals tested positive for Influenza, severe acute respiratory coronavirus virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) or RSV along with 80 who tested negative. 110 were symptomatic with the median time from symptom onset to testing of 1 day (interquartile range 2-5 days). Using the clinical nasopharyngeal swab as the reference standard, the sensitivity was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.43-0.95) and specificity was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.93-1.00) for RSV, sensitivity is 0.67 (95% CI, 0.49-0.81) and specificity is 0.96 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99) for Influenza.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiplex testing with a self-collected oral-nasal swab for Influenza and RSV is not an acceptable substitute for a healthcare provider collected nasopharyngeal swab primarily due to suboptimal Influenza test characteristics.

摘要

目的

呼吸道病毒检测是常规操作,为做好大流行防范准备,需要找到除鼻咽拭子之外的样本采集方法。主要目的是验证自我采集的口鼻拭子用于检测流感病毒和呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)的有效性。

设计

将自我采集的口鼻拭子与医护人员采集的鼻咽拭子进行对比,对诊断测试进行验证。

地点

迈克尔·加伦医院急诊科。

参与者

因疑似病毒性上呼吸道感染到急诊科就诊且自我采集了口鼻拭子的连续患者。流感病毒或呼吸道合胞病毒检测呈阳性的个体以及随机选取的检测呈阴性的参与者均符合纳入条件。

干预措施

所有参与者均使用多重呼吸道病毒聚合酶链反应对配对的口鼻拭子进行三种呼吸道病原体检测,并与鼻咽拭子检测结果进行比较。

结果

48人流感病毒、严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)或呼吸道合胞病毒检测呈阳性,80人检测呈阴性。110人有症状,症状出现到检测的中位时间为1天(四分位间距2 - 5天)。以临床鼻咽拭子为参考标准,呼吸道合胞病毒检测的灵敏度为0.75(95%置信区间,0.43 - 0.95),特异度为0.99(95%置信区间,0.93 - 1.00);流感病毒检测的灵敏度为0.67(95%置信区间,0.49 - 0.81),特异度为0.96(95%置信区间,0.89 - 0.99)。

结论

主要由于流感检测特性欠佳,自我采集的口鼻拭子用于流感病毒和呼吸道合胞病毒的多重检测不能替代医护人员采集的鼻咽拭子。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ffaa/12022927/b08b6e70cd5e/S2732494X2500066X_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验