• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

低剂量与高剂量甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗肺炎的疗效比较

Low- versus high-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of pneumonia.

作者信息

Taranto Bradley, Wardlow Lynn C, Coe Kelci, Bazan Jose A, Leininger Jessica

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Mount Carmel East Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.

Department of Pharmacy, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA.

出版信息

Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 15;5(1):e95. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.64. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1017/ash.2025.64
PMID:40290179
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12022928/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of patients treated with low-dose (LD) versus high-dose (HD) trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (TMP-SMX) for pneumonia.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Large academic tertiary-care center.

PATIENTS

Hospitalized adult patients who received at least 8 mg/kg/day of TMP-SMX for at least 96 hours for treatment of pneumonia between October 2012 and September 2022. Patients were included if they were diagnosed with pneumonia based on clinical and radiographic findings at the time of initiation of antibiotics.

METHODS

The primary outcome was clinical success at the end of therapy among patients treated with LD (8-12 mg/kg/day) versus HD (>12 mg/kg/day) TMP-SMX. Secondary outcomes included microbiological success, all-cause and infection-related inpatient mortality, infection recurrence, development of TMP-SMX resistance, and incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) and hyperkalemia.

RESULTS

95 patients were included (LD, = 20 versus HD, = 75). There was no difference in the primary outcome of clinical success at the end of therapy between groups (LD 57% versus HD 65%, = 0.53). Secondary outcomes, including inpatient infection-related mortality ( = 0.56), AKI ( = 0.61), and hyperkalemia ( = 0.34) also did not differ significantly between the LD and HD groups.

CONCLUSIONS

No differences in clinical success or adverse events were observed in patients with pneumonia treated with either LD or HD TMP-SMX.

摘要

目的

比较低剂量(LD)与高剂量(HD)甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑(TMP-SMX)治疗肺炎患者的疗效。

设计

回顾性队列研究。

地点

大型学术三级医疗中心。

患者

2012年10月至2022年9月期间因肺炎接受至少96小时、至少8mg/kg/天TMP-SMX治疗的住院成年患者。如果患者在开始使用抗生素时根据临床和影像学检查结果被诊断为肺炎,则纳入研究。

方法

主要结局是接受LD(8-12mg/kg/天)与HD(>12mg/kg/天)TMP-SMX治疗的患者在治疗结束时的临床成功率。次要结局包括微生物学成功率、全因和感染相关的住院死亡率、感染复发、TMP-SMX耐药性的发生以及急性肾损伤(AKI)和高钾血症的发生率。

结果

纳入95例患者(LD组20例,HD组75例)。两组之间治疗结束时临床成功的主要结局无差异(LD组57%,HD组65%,P=0.53)。次要结局,包括住院感染相关死亡率(P=0.56)、AKI(P=0.61)和高钾血症(P=0.34)在LD组和HD组之间也无显著差异。

结论

LD或HD TMP-SMX治疗肺炎患者的临床成功率或不良事件无差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e230/12022928/ef1ce2207168/S2732494X25000646_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e230/12022928/ef1ce2207168/S2732494X25000646_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e230/12022928/ef1ce2207168/S2732494X25000646_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Low- versus high-dose trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for the treatment of pneumonia.低剂量与高剂量甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑治疗肺炎的疗效比较
Antimicrob Steward Healthc Epidemiol. 2025 Apr 15;5(1):e95. doi: 10.1017/ash.2025.64. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical outcomes of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection treated with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, minocycline, or fluoroquinolone monotherapy.单用复方新诺明、米诺环素或氟喹诺酮治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的临床疗效。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2021 Aug;58(2):106367. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2021.106367. Epub 2021 May 28.
3
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus levofloxacin for the treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: A multicentre cohort study.复方磺胺甲噁唑与左氧氟沙星治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的多中心队列研究。
J Glob Antimicrob Resist. 2024 Sep;38:42-48. doi: 10.1016/j.jgar.2024.05.016. Epub 2024 May 30.
4
Comparison of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole versus minocycline monotherapy for treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia pneumonia.甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑与米诺环素单药治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌肺炎的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2025 Apr 2;80(4):988-995. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkaf024.
5
Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Versus Levofloxacin for Infections: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Study of Electronic Health Records from 154 US Hospitals.甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑与左氧氟沙星治疗感染的比较:一项对美国154家医院电子健康记录的回顾性疗效研究
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2022 Jan 17;9(2):ofab644. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofab644. eCollection 2022 Feb.
6
The Activities of Antimicrobials Against Isolates and Evaluation of Clinical Outcomes Among Treatment Regimens in Patients with Infections: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.抗菌药物对感染患者分离株的活性及不同治疗方案临床结局的评估:一项回顾性多中心队列研究
Infect Drug Resist. 2023 Aug 9;16:5173-5184. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S416678. eCollection 2023.
7
Efficacy of Cefiderocol in Experimental Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Pneumonia in Persistently Neutropenic Rabbits.头孢地尔在持续中性粒细胞减少兔实验性嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌肺炎中的疗效。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022 Oct 18;66(10):e0061822. doi: 10.1128/aac.00618-22. Epub 2022 Sep 26.
8
Comparison of Doxycycline or Minocycline to Sulfamethoxazole-Trimethoprim for Treatment of Pneumonia.多西环素或米诺环素与磺胺甲噁唑-甲氧苄啶治疗肺炎的比较。
Ann Pharmacother. 2024 Jan;58(1):21-27. doi: 10.1177/10600280231166413. Epub 2023 Apr 26.
9
Low-Dose vs Conventional-Dose Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole Treatment for Pneumocystis Pneumonia in Patients Not Infected With HIV: A Multicenter, Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.未感染 HIV 的肺孢子菌肺炎患者中低剂量与常规剂量复方磺胺甲噁唑治疗的比较:一项多中心回顾性观察性队列研究。
Chest. 2024 Jan;165(1):58-67. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2023.08.009. Epub 2023 Aug 11.
10
Emerging importance of multidrug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections in neonatal intensive care unit in a tertiary center in Turkey.土耳其一家三级中心新生儿重症监护病房中多重耐药嗜麦芽寡养单胞菌感染的重要性日益增加。
Pediatr Neonatol. 2024 Mar;65(2):183-187. doi: 10.1016/j.pedneo.2023.04.019. Epub 2023 Oct 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Infectious Diseases Society of America 2024 Guidance on the Treatment of Antimicrobial-Resistant Gram-Negative Infections.美国传染病学会2024年抗微生物药物耐药革兰氏阴性菌感染治疗指南
Clin Infect Dis. 2024 Aug 7. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae403.
2
Infectious Diseases Society of America Guidance on the Treatment of AmpC β-Lactamase-Producing Enterobacterales, Carbapenem-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii, and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections.美国传染病学会关于治疗产 AmpC β-内酰胺酶肠杆菌科、耐碳青霉烯类鲍曼不动杆菌和嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的指南。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Jul 6;74(12):2089-2114. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab1013.
3
Antimicrobial Treatment Strategies for : A Focus on Novel Therapies.
抗菌治疗策略:聚焦新型疗法
Antibiotics (Basel). 2021 Oct 9;10(10):1226. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics10101226.
4
Clinical and Microbiologic Outcomes in Patients with Monomicrobial Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Infections.单一致病菌嗜麦芽寡养单胞菌感染患者的临床和微生物学结局。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019 Oct 22;63(11). doi: 10.1128/AAC.00788-19. Print 2019 Nov.
5
Population Structure, Molecular Epidemiology, and β-Lactamase Diversity among Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Isolates in the United States.美国嗜麦芽寡养单胞菌分离株的种群结构、分子流行病学和β-内酰胺酶多样性。
mBio. 2019 Jul 2;10(4):e00405-19. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00405-19.
6
Monotherapy with minocycline or trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole for treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.米诺环素或甲氧苄啶/磺胺甲恶唑单药治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2016 Apr;71(4):1071-5. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkv456. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
7
Update on infections caused by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia with particular attention to resistance mechanisms and therapeutic options.嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌引起的感染最新情况,特别关注耐药机制和治疗选择。
Front Microbiol. 2015 Sep 2;6:893. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00893. eCollection 2015.
8
Cotrimoxazole - optimal dosing in the critically ill.复方新诺明——危重症患者的最佳给药剂量
Ann Intensive Care. 2014 Apr 28;4:13. doi: 10.1186/2110-5820-4-13. eCollection 2014.
9
Monotherapy with fluoroquinolone or trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for treatment of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections.氟喹诺酮类或复方磺胺甲噁唑单药治疗嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2014;58(1):176-82. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01324-13. Epub 2013 Oct 21.
10
Attributable mortality of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infections: a systematic review of the literature.嗜麦芽窄食单胞菌感染的归因死亡率:文献系统评价。
Future Microbiol. 2009 Nov;4(9):1103-9. doi: 10.2217/fmb.09.84.