Misra Supriya, Rahman Tasfia, Ali Shahmir H, Taher M D, Mitra Paroma
Department of Public Health, San Francisco State University, San Francisco, CA.
Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.
AJPM Focus. 2025 Mar 18;4(3):100333. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2025.100333. eCollection 2025 Jun.
The study of severe mental conditions has primarily remained under the purview of basic and clinical research. Although global epidemiological data indicate that immigrant groups are at higher risk of these conditions, U.S. data are lacking. Qualitative studies can be an important first step to bring attention to understudied phenomena.
This manuscript describes strategies used to conduct semi-structured, in-depth individual interviews on experiences and perceptions of severe mental conditions among South Asian individuals with psychiatric diagnoses (=21), family members (=11), and clinicians (=4) in New York City. These strategies were synthesized from the team's internal notes of adaptations during the study design and data collection, weekly debrief meetings during data analysis, and brainstorm sessions for this manuscript.
The main results of the study are reported elsewhere. This section focuses on lessons learned to improve immigrant participant interest and engagement, including the strengths and limitations of the healthcare setting; recruitment by a multilingual South Asian psychiatrist; interviews by non-clinical South Asian researchers selected for a variety of ages, genders, and languages; and the interview process and content.
Overall, these strategies show the feasibility of non-clinical researchers to collect high-quality data about severe mental conditions among immigrant communities, noting that the details of specific strategies and results will be particular to each immigrant community. Public health research on severe mental conditions is essential to understand and address the experiences of severe mental conditions among immigrant communities in the U.S.
对严重精神疾病的研究主要仍在基础研究和临床研究的范畴内。尽管全球流行病学数据表明移民群体患这些疾病的风险更高,但美国缺乏相关数据。定性研究可能是引起人们对研究不足现象关注的重要第一步。
本手稿描述了用于对纽约市患有精神疾病诊断的南亚个体(=21)、家庭成员(=11)和临床医生(=4)就严重精神疾病的经历和看法进行半结构化、深入个人访谈的策略。这些策略是从研究设计和数据收集期间团队的内部适应记录、数据分析期间的每周汇报会议以及本手稿的头脑风暴会议中综合得出的。
该研究的主要结果在其他地方报道。本节重点关注为提高移民参与者兴趣和参与度所吸取的经验教训,包括医疗保健环境的优势和局限性;由一位会多种语言的南亚精神科医生进行招募;由为不同年龄、性别和语言挑选的非临床南亚研究人员进行访谈;以及访谈过程和内容。
总体而言,这些策略表明非临床研究人员有可行性收集关于移民社区严重精神疾病的高质量数据,同时指出具体策略和结果的细节将因每个移民社区而异。对严重精神疾病的公共卫生研究对于理解和解决美国移民社区中严重精神疾病的经历至关重要。