Suppr超能文献

一种用于评估医疗学习环境中的偏见、种族主义和盟友关系的工具。

A Tool to Assess Bias, Racism, and Allyship in the Healthcare Learning Environment.

作者信息

Shamith Simran, Giordano Carolyn, Crawford Beverley A, Jones Angela, Bleiweiss Kaitlyn, Kachur Elizabeth

机构信息

Medicine, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.

Medical Education, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Cureus. 2025 Mar 25;17(3):e81193. doi: 10.7759/cureus.81193. eCollection 2025 Mar.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

While healthcare students receive robust clinical training, social issues like bias and allyship are often overlooked. This study developed a new survey tool to assess how healthcare students perceive bias, racism, and allyship in their learning environment.

METHODS

Using a validated scale as a frame from the John Hopkins Learning Environment Survey (JHLES), researchers created a new assessment tool to measure perceptions of bias, racism, and allyship across three different healthcare institutions representing medicine, dentistry, and nursing.  Results: A total of 212 responses were collected. The data showed that non-minority students had greater agreement on questions regarding equitable opportunities to excel, feeling free to speak up in clinical settings against bias, and overall perceptions of the learning environment. Men felt more comfortable speaking up against racial bias or feeling that someone would speak out on their behalf and reported higher feelings of acceptance within their learning environment.

CONCLUSION

This study developed and implemented a new survey tool to assess bias and racism across three medical education environments, medicine, dentistry, and nursing, demonstrating its relevance across fields with differing curricula and cultures. While small differences related to institution, minority status, gender, and class year were noted, the tool's wide applicability provides a baseline for institutions seeking to assess bias within their learning environments.

摘要

引言

虽然医学生接受了全面的临床培训,但诸如偏见和盟友关系等社会问题往往被忽视。本研究开发了一种新的调查工具,以评估医学生如何看待其学习环境中的偏见、种族主义和盟友关系。

方法

研究人员以约翰·霍普金斯大学学习环境调查(JHLES)中经过验证的量表为框架,创建了一种新的评估工具,用于衡量来自医学、牙科和护理三个不同医疗机构的学生对偏见、种族主义和盟友关系的看法。结果:共收集到212份回复。数据显示,非少数族裔学生在关于公平的卓越机会、在临床环境中自由表达对偏见的看法以及对学习环境的总体看法等问题上的认同度更高。男性在表达对种族偏见的反对意见或感觉有人会为他们发声方面感觉更自在,并且报告称在学习环境中的被接纳感更高。

结论

本研究开发并实施了一种新的调查工具,以评估医学、牙科和护理这三个医学教育环境中的偏见和种族主义,证明了其在课程和文化不同的领域中的相关性。虽然注意到了与机构、少数族裔身份、性别和年级相关的细微差异,但该工具的广泛适用性为寻求评估其学习环境中偏见的机构提供了一个基线。

相似文献

5
Compassion as a tool for allyship and anti-racism.同情作为盟友关系和反种族主义的一种工具。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 11;14:1143384. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1143384. eCollection 2023.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验