Soeterik Timo F W, Wu Xiaobo, Van den Bergh Roderick C N, Kesch Claudia, Zattoni Fabio, Falagario Ugo, Martini Alberto, Miszczyk Marcin, Fasulo Vittorio, Maggi Martina, Kasivisvanathan Veeru, Rajwa Pawel, Marra Giancarlo, Gandaglia Giorgio, Chiu Peter K F
Department of Urology, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein/Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Eur Urol Open Sci. 2025 Apr 15;75:106-119. doi: 10.1016/j.euros.2025.03.006. eCollection 2025 May.
Efforts made over the last decade for the detection of prostate cancer (PCa) have revolutionised disease diagnostics, and implementation of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has received widespread acceptance. However, universal adoption of prebiopsy MRI and the benefits achieved have been limited by availability and equivocal MRI findings. This review aims to evaluate the latest evidence on the role of existing PCa risk calculators (RCs), and blood and urinary biomarkers as part of the diagnostic algorithm to improve the diagnosis of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) and reduce unnecessary MRI procedures and biopsies. We will also evaluate the potential of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) to enhance sensitivity and specificity for PCa diagnosis, complement MRI, and refine biopsy strategies within the diagnostic pathway.
We performed a narrative review using the PubMed/MEDLINE database, which included papers published between January 2014 and June 2024. The outcome measures included rates of reduced diagnoses of nonsignificant PCa (defined as International Society of Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade group 1) cases, diagnoses of csPCa (defined as ISUP grade group ≥2) cases missed, and MRI scans and prostate biopsies avoided.
In men with abnormal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, further risk stratification using RCs, or blood or urine biomarkers can reduce up to 16-51% MRI scans, while missing 1-16% csPCa cases. In case of equivocal MRI results or Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System 3 lesions, RCs or biomarkers could reduce up to 72% of biopsies, while missing only 3-13% csPCa cases. PSMA PET has emerging potential to improve csPCa prediction in combination with MRI and may further reduce unnecessary biopsies. A limitation of this study is that this is a narrative but not a systematic review.
RCs and biomarkers have been demonstrated to enhance the performance and efficiency of MRI in detecting csPCa in men with elevated PSA levels. PSMA PET shows promise in detecting csPCa, complementing MRI and refining biopsy indications.
In men with a suspicion of prostate cancer, magnetic resonance imaging prostate scans are effective in predicting clinically relevant cancer, but challenges including availability and equivocal scans exist. A personalised approach by adding one or more of clinical risk calculators, blood or urine biomarkers, or even novel imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography scans may improve cancer prediction further and reduce unnecessary scans and biopsies.
过去十年间在前列腺癌(PCa)检测方面所做的努力彻底改变了疾病诊断方式,活检前磁共振成像(MRI)的应用已得到广泛认可。然而,活检前MRI的普遍采用以及所取得的益处受到可用性和MRI结果不明确的限制。本综述旨在评估现有PCa风险计算器(RCs)、血液和尿液生物标志物作为诊断算法一部分在改善临床显著性PCa(csPCa)诊断及减少不必要的MRI检查和活检方面作用的最新证据。我们还将评估前列腺特异性膜抗原(PSMA)正电子发射断层扫描(PET)在提高PCa诊断的敏感性和特异性、补充MRI以及优化诊断途径中的活检策略方面的潜力。
我们使用PubMed/MEDLINE数据库进行了叙述性综述,纳入了2014年1月至2024年6月发表的论文。结局指标包括非显著性PCa(定义为国际泌尿病理学会[ISUP]分级组1)病例诊断减少率、漏诊的csPCa(定义为ISUP分级组≥2)病例诊断率以及避免的MRI扫描和前列腺活检率。
在前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)水平异常的男性中,使用RCs或血液或尿液生物标志物进行进一步风险分层可减少多达16% - 51%的MRI扫描,同时漏诊1% - 16%的csPCa病例。在MRI结果不明确或前列腺影像报告和数据系统3类病变的情况下,RCs或生物标志物可减少多达72%的活检,同时仅漏诊3% - 13%的csPCa病例。PSMA PET与MRI联合应用在改善csPCa预测方面具有新的潜力,可能进一步减少不必要的活检。本研究的一个局限性在于这是一篇叙述性而非系统性综述。
RCs和生物标志物已被证明可提高MRI在检测PSA水平升高男性的csPCa方面的性能和效率。PSMA PET在检测csPCa、补充MRI以及优化活检指征方面显示出前景。
在怀疑患有前列腺癌的男性中,前列腺磁共振成像扫描在预测临床相关癌症方面有效,但存在包括可用性和扫描结果不明确等挑战。通过添加一种或多种临床风险计算器、血液或尿液生物标志物,甚至正电子发射断层扫描等新型成像技术的个性化方法,可能进一步改善癌症预测并减少不必要的扫描和活检。