• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2型糖尿病社会经济不平等的行为和代谢中介因素:反事实与传统中介分析比较

Behavioural and metabolic mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in type 2 diabetes: comparing counterfactual and traditional mediation analysis.

作者信息

Yacaman Mendez Diego, Trolle Lagerros Ylva, Ponce de Leon Antonio, Tynelius Per, Fors Stefan, Lager Anton

机构信息

Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.

Centre for Epidemiology and Community Medicine (CES), Stockholm Health Care Services, Stockholm, Sweden.

出版信息

Eur J Public Health. 2025 Aug 1;35(4):605-610. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf056.

DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckaf056
PMID:40294357
Abstract

There is a well-established social gradient in the occurrence of type 2 diabetes, but the extent to which behavioural or metabolic risk factors explain these inequalities remains unclear. Leveraging data from 7123 adults and over 20 years of follow-up, we used counterfactual mediation analysis to estimate the direct effect of low socioeconomic status (measured as educational attainment and occupational class) on the risk of type 2 diabetes, and the indirect effect through behavioural and metabolic risk factors. Mediators included were smoking, high alcohol consumption, low physical activity, diet low in vegetables or fruits, high body mass index (BMI), high fasting glucose, and hypertension. We compared the results to mediation analysis using the difference and the product of coefficients methods. We found an association between low educational attainment 1.31 (95% CI 1.16, 1.45) and low occupational class 1.24 (95% CI 1.09, 1.38) with future risk of type 2 diabetes. In the counterfactual mediation analysis, behavioural and metabolic risk factors explained 60% (95% CI 41%, 75%) of the effect of low educational attainment and 42% (95% CI 19%, 65%) of the effect of occupational class on the risk of type 2 diabetes. The difference and product of coefficients methods yielded similar results. Well-established behavioural and metabolic mediators explained roughly half of the health inequalities in the incidence of type 2 diabetes. Public health interventions should consider alternative mechanisms to reduce disparities in the incidence of type 2 diabetes.

摘要

2型糖尿病的发生存在着既定的社会梯度,但行为或代谢风险因素在多大程度上解释了这些不平等现象仍不清楚。利用来自7123名成年人的数据及20多年的随访,我们采用反事实中介分析来估计低社会经济地位(以教育程度和职业阶层衡量)对2型糖尿病风险的直接影响,以及通过行为和代谢风险因素产生的间接影响。纳入的中介因素包括吸烟、大量饮酒、缺乏体育锻炼、蔬菜或水果摄入量低的饮食、高体重指数(BMI)、高空腹血糖和高血压。我们将结果与使用系数差值法和系数乘积法的中介分析结果进行了比较。我们发现低教育程度1.31(95%置信区间1.16,1.45)和低职业阶层1.24(95%置信区间1.09,1.38)与未来2型糖尿病风险之间存在关联。在反事实中介分析中,行为和代谢风险因素解释了低教育程度影响的60%(95%置信区间41%,75%)以及职业阶层对2型糖尿病风险影响的42%(95%置信区间19%,65%)。系数差值法和系数乘积法得出了相似的结果。既定的行为和代谢中介因素解释了2型糖尿病发病率中约一半的健康不平等现象。公共卫生干预措施应考虑采用其他机制来减少2型糖尿病发病率的差异。

相似文献

1
Behavioural and metabolic mediators of socioeconomic inequalities in type 2 diabetes: comparing counterfactual and traditional mediation analysis.2型糖尿病社会经济不平等的行为和代谢中介因素:反事实与传统中介分析比较
Eur J Public Health. 2025 Aug 1;35(4):605-610. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf056.
2
Differences in the effectiveness of individual-level smoking cessation interventions by socioeconomic status.个体层面戒烟干预措施的有效性在社会经济地位方面的差异。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jan 27;1(1):CD015120. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015120.pub2.
3
Targeted mass media interventions promoting healthy behaviours to reduce risk of non-communicable diseases in adult, ethnic minorities.针对成年少数民族群体,通过有针对性的大众媒体干预措施来促进健康行为,以降低非传染性疾病风险。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 17;2(2):CD011683. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011683.pub2.
4
Diet, physical activity and behavioural interventions for the treatment of overweight or obese adolescents aged 12 to 17 years.针对12至17岁超重或肥胖青少年的饮食、体育活动及行为干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6(6):CD012691. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012691.
5
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
6
[Association between obesity and the risk of microvascular complications in Yinzhou District, Ningbo adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus].[宁波鄞州区2型糖尿病成年患者肥胖与微血管并发症风险的相关性]
Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2025 Jul;54(4):608-620. doi: 10.19813/j.cnki.weishengyanjiu.2025.04.012.
7
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
8
Nutritional interventions for survivors of childhood cancer.儿童癌症幸存者的营养干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 22;2016(8):CD009678. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009678.pub2.
9
Different intensities of glycaemic control for women with gestational diabetes mellitus.不同强度的血糖控制对妊娠期糖尿病妇女的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 10;10(10):CD011624. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011624.pub3.
10
Psychological interventions for adults who have sexually offended or are at risk of offending.针对有性犯罪行为或有性犯罪风险的成年人的心理干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Dec 12;12(12):CD007507. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007507.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
The importance of material deprivation in type 2 diabetes incidence: longitudinal analyses in the Maastricht study.物质匮乏对2型糖尿病发病率的影响:马斯特里赫特研究的纵向分析
BMC Public Health. 2025 Sep 2;25(1):3013. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-24263-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Financial Incentives, Income Supplementation, Cash Transfer, and Universal Basic Income Interventions in Diabetes: Understanding Differences and Effectiveness: A Scoping Review.糖尿病领域中的经济激励、收入补充、现金转移和普遍基本收入干预措施:理解差异与有效性:一项范围综述
Diabetes Care. 2025 Mar 1;48(3):306-323. doi: 10.2337/dci24-0072.
2
Interventions to address global inequity in diabetes: international progress.解决全球糖尿病不平等问题的干预措施:国际进展。
Lancet. 2023 Jul 15;402(10397):250-264. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00914-5. Epub 2023 Jun 22.
3
Experiences of conditional and unconditional cash transfers intended for improving health outcomes and health service use: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
有条件和无条件现金转移以改善健康结果和卫生服务利用的经验:定性证据综合。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 31;3(3):CD013635. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013635.pub2.
4
3. Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes and Associated Comorbidities: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023.3. 2 型糖尿病及其合并症的预防或延缓:2023 年糖尿病护理标准。
Diabetes Care. 2023 Jan 1;46(Suppl 1):S41-S48. doi: 10.2337/dc23-S003.
5
Cohort Profile: The Stockholm Diabetes Prevention Programme (SDPP).队列简介:斯德哥尔摩糖尿病预防计划(SDPP)。
Int J Epidemiol. 2022 Dec 13;51(6):e401-e413. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyac147.
6
Mediation analysis methods used in observational research: a scoping review and recommendations.观察性研究中中介分析方法的应用:范围综述及建议。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Oct 25;21(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01426-3.
7
A Guideline for Reporting Mediation Analyses of Randomized Trials and Observational Studies: The AGReMA Statement.随机试验和观察性研究中介分析报告的指南:AGReMA 声明。
JAMA. 2021 Sep 21;326(11):1045-1056. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.14075.
8
Social Determinants of Health and Diabetes: A Scientific Review.健康与糖尿病的社会决定因素:一项科学综述。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Nov 2;44(1):258-79. doi: 10.2337/dci20-0053.
9
Education and incident type 2 diabetes: quantifying the impact of differential exposure and susceptibility to being overweight or obese.教育与2型糖尿病发病:量化超重或肥胖的差异暴露及易感性的影响。
Diabetologia. 2020 Sep;63(9):1764-1774. doi: 10.1007/s00125-020-05150-3. Epub 2020 May 3.
10
2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes: .2. 糖尿病的分类和诊断: 。
Diabetes Care. 2020 Jan;43(Suppl 1):S14-S31. doi: 10.2337/dc20-S002.