Ding Lijuan, Zhou Mengyu, Yin Jiahui, Zhang Xiaoming, Ye Qianwen, Qian Niansong
Department of Oncology, Hainan Hospital of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Sanya, P.R. China.
Chinese PLA Medical School, Beijing, P.R. China.
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251339261. doi: 10.1177/10732748251339261. Epub 2025 Apr 28.
The use of antibiotic (Abx) is common in gastric cancer (GC) patients undergoing radical resection; however, the prognostic value of the use of these agents in stage I-III patients remains largely unknown. Data concerning the use of Abx in GC patients during surgery including the cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) and types of Abx, were collected retrospectively. Differences in clinical features between cDDD subgroups and type subgroups were compared. Overall survival (OS) differences were tested via the Kaplan-Meier method, and risk factors for survival were validated by a Cox proportional hazards model. Of 162 patients enrolled, 81 were assigned to the low-cDDD and 81 to the high-cDDD group. Among them, 19 patients were assigned to ≤2 types and 143 to ≥3 types. The low- and high-cDDD subgroups of patients presented no significant difference in OS (log rank = 2.21, = 0.137). Patients receiving ≥3 types presented significantly better OS (log rank = 4.58, = 0.032) than those receiving ≤2 types. The low- and high-cDDD subgroups (log rank = 3.83, = 0.050), but not the ≤2 and ≥3 type subgroups (log rank<0.01, = 0.982), presented a significant difference in OS in patients undergoing total gastrectomy. These differences were maintained in patients without total gastrectomy (cDDD: log rank = 7.92, = 0.005; types: log rank = 6.52, = 0.011). The use of multiple Abx types was validated as an independent factor for OS (HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.24-0.90; = 0.024). Abx use during surgery in patients with stage I-III GC may potentially correlate with the prognosis. Patients with ≥3 types of Abx were more likely to have good outcomes, particularly in those without total gastrectomy.
在接受根治性切除的胃癌(GC)患者中,抗生素(Abx)的使用很常见;然而,这些药物在I - III期患者中的预后价值在很大程度上仍不清楚。回顾性收集了GC患者手术期间Abx使用的数据,包括累积限定日剂量(cDDD)和Abx类型。比较了cDDD亚组和类型亚组之间的临床特征差异。通过Kaplan - Meier方法检验总生存期(OS)差异,并通过Cox比例风险模型验证生存的危险因素。在纳入的162例患者中,81例被分配到低cDDD组,81例被分配到高cDDD组。其中,19例患者被分配到≤2种类型,143例被分配到≥3种类型。低cDDD组和高cDDD组患者的OS无显著差异(对数秩检验 = 2.21,P = 0.137)。接受≥3种类型Abx的患者的OS显著优于接受≤2种类型的患者(对数秩检验 = 4.58,P = 0.032)。低cDDD组和高cDDD组(对数秩检验 = 3.83,P = 0.050),但≤2种类型和≥3种类型亚组之间(对数秩检验<0.01,P = 0.982),在接受全胃切除术的患者中OS存在显著差异。在未接受全胃切除术的患者中这些差异依然存在(cDDD:对数秩检验 = 7.92,P = 0.005;类型:对数秩检验 = 6.52,P = 0.011)。使用多种Abx类型被验证为OS的独立因素(风险比 = 0.46,95%置信区间:0.24 - 0.90;P = 0.024)。I - III期GC患者手术期间的Abx使用可能与预后相关。接受≥3种类型Abx的患者更有可能有良好的预后,尤其是在未接受全胃切除术的患者中。