Yue-Xiang Liang, Jing-Yu Deng, Xue-Wei Ding, Xiao-Na Wang, Bao-Gui Wang, Li Zhang, Han Liang, Department of Gastric Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China.
World J Gastroenterol. 2013 Oct 21;19(39):6568-78. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v19.i39.6568.
To elucidate the prognostic value of age for gastric cancer and identify the optimal treatment for elderly gastric cancer patients.
We enrolled 920 patients with gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy between January 2003 and December 2007 in our center. Patients were categorized into three groups: younger group (age < 50 years), middle-aged group (50-69 years), and elderly group (≥ 70 years). Clinicopathological features were compared among the three groups and potential prognostic factors were analyzed. The log-rank test was used to assess statistical differences between curves. Independent prognostic factors were identified by the Cox proportional hazards regression model. Stratified analysis was used to investigate the impact of age on survival at each stage. Cancer-specific survival was also compared among the three groups by excluding deaths due to reasons other than gastric cancer. We analyzed the potential prognostic factors for patients aged ≥ 70 years. Finally, the impact of extent of lymphadenectomy and postoperative chemotherapy on survival for each age group was evaluated.
In the elderly group, there was a male predominance. At the same time, cancers of the upper third of the stomach, differentiated type, and less-invasive surgery were more common than in the younger or middle-aged groups. Elderly patients were more likely to have advanced tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and larger tumors, but less likely to have distant metastasis. Although 5-year overall survival (OS) rate specific to gastric cancer was not significantly different among the three groups, elderly patients demonstrated a significantly lower 5-year OS rate than the younger and middle-aged patients (elderly vs middle-aged vs younger patients = 22.0% vs 36.6% vs 38.0%, respectively). In the TNM-stratified analysis, the differences in OS were only observed in patients with II and III tumors. In multivariate analysis, only surgical margin status, pT4, lymph node metastasis, M1 and sex were independent prognostic factors for elderly patients. The 5-year OS rate did not differ between elderly patients undergoing D1 and D2 lymph node resection, and these patients benefited little from chemotherapy.
Age ≥ 70 years was an independent prognostic factor for gastric cancer after gastrectomy. D1 resection is appropriate and postoperative chemotherapy is possibly unnecessary for elderly patients with gastric cancer.
阐明年龄对胃癌的预后价值,并确定老年胃癌患者的最佳治疗方法。
我们纳入了 2003 年 1 月至 2007 年 12 月在我院接受胃切除术的 920 例胃癌患者。将患者分为三组:年轻组(年龄<50 岁)、中年组(50-69 岁)和老年组(≥70 岁)。比较三组患者的临床病理特征,分析潜在的预后因素。采用对数秩检验比较曲线之间的统计学差异。采用 Cox 比例风险回归模型确定独立的预后因素。采用分层分析探讨年龄对各期生存的影响。排除因胃癌以外原因导致的死亡后,还比较了三组患者的胃癌特异性生存率。分析了≥70 岁患者的潜在预后因素。最后,评估了各年龄组淋巴结清扫程度和术后化疗对生存的影响。
老年组男性居多。同时,胃上部癌、分化型和侵袭性较小的手术也比年轻或中年组更为常见。老年患者更有可能处于晚期肿瘤-淋巴结-转移(TNM)分期和更大的肿瘤,但远处转移的可能性较小。尽管三组患者的 5 年胃癌特异性总生存率(OS)率无显著差异,但老年患者的 5 年 OS 率明显低于年轻和中年患者(老年 vs 中年 vs 年轻患者=22.0% vs 36.6% vs 38.0%)。在 TNM 分层分析中,仅在 II 期和 III 期患者中观察到 OS 差异。多因素分析显示,仅手术切缘状态、pT4、淋巴结转移、M1 和性别是老年患者的独立预后因素。老年患者行 D1 和 D2 淋巴结清扫的 5 年 OS 率无差异,且这些患者从化疗中获益甚少。
年龄≥70 岁是胃切除术后胃癌的独立预后因素。对于老年胃癌患者,D1 切除术是合适的,术后化疗可能不必要。