Silaide Araujo Antonio, Sato Emilia Inoue, de Souza Alexandre Wagner Silva, Jennings Fábio, Kirsztajn Gianna Mastroianni, Sesso Ricardo, Reis-Neto Edgard Torres Dos
Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil.
Rheumatology Division, Department of Medicine, Universidade Federal de Sao Paulo, Escola Paulista de Medicina, São Paulo, Brazil
Lupus Sci Med. 2025 Apr 28;12(1):e001538. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2025-001538.
Primary: To validate a previously developed lupus nephritis (LN) histologic class predictor tool (III or IV±(V) vs V). In this instrument, urinary sediment, anti-dsDNA antibody and serum creatinine were predictor variables. Secondary: To evaluate its accuracy in different cut levels of urinary red cell count and LN patient's profile that may be useful to guide diagnosis and treatment, especially when kidney biopsy is not available.
A retrospective, cross-sectional study of 196 patients with SLE who underwent kidney biopsy, analysing sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, accuracy, and positive and negative likelihood ratios.
81.6% of the patients were female, 60.2% were non-Caucasian and the mean age at the time of the biopsy was 31.2±10.4 years. 30 patients presented class III, 104 class IV, 36 class V and 26 mixed classes (7 class III+V and 19 class IV+V). In the validation cohort, sensitivity was 90.6%, specifically was 66.7%, positive predictive value was 92.4% and accuracy was 86.2%, in predicting proliferative classes (class III or IV(±V) vs class V). There was no difference when analysing urinary red cell counts >5 x 10/mL, >10 x 10/mL or >20 x 10/mL, as well as when the tool was applied in the first or recurrent LN and in proliferative LN without class V.
The validation of a tool to predict proliferative histologic class showed good performance, like that found in the development cohort, without difference in accuracy with different cut-off points for urinary red cell count or number of flares of LN. It is easily applied and can be accessed via the internet (https://nefritelupica.medicalcore.com.br).
主要目的:验证先前开发的狼疮性肾炎(LN)组织学分类预测工具(III或IV±(V)与V)。在此工具中,尿沉渣、抗双链DNA抗体和血清肌酐为预测变量。次要目的:评估其在不同尿红细胞计数临界值和LN患者特征中的准确性,这可能有助于指导诊断和治疗,尤其是在无法进行肾活检时。
对196例接受肾活检的SLE患者进行回顾性横断面研究,分析敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值、准确性以及阳性和阴性似然比。
81.6%的患者为女性,60.2%为非白种人,活检时的平均年龄为31.2±10.4岁。30例为III级,104例为IV级,36例为V级,26例为混合级(7例III+V级和19例IV+V级)。在验证队列中,预测增殖性分级(III或IV(±V)级与V级)时,敏感性为90.6%,特异性为66.7%,阳性预测值为92.4%,准确性为86.2%。分析尿红细胞计数>5×10⁶/mL、>10×10⁶/mL或>20×10⁶/mL时,以及该工具应用于初发或复发LN和无V级的增殖性LN时,均无差异。
预测增殖性组织学分级的工具验证显示出良好性能,与开发队列中的情况相似,在不同尿红细胞计数临界值或LN发作次数方面准确性无差异。它易于应用,可通过互联网访问(https://nefritelupica.medicalcore.com.br)。