Wang Ling-Ling, Guo Xiao-Guang, Li Yang, Xue Fu-Shan, Yang Jian-Jun
Department of Anesthesiology, Pain and Perioperative Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou City, Henan Province, People's Republic of China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Shengli Clinical Medical College of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou City, Fujian Province, People's Republic of China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 28;15(1):14828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99789-w.
Edentulous patients often experience difficult facemask ventilation during anesthesia induction, primarily due to inadequate facemask seal and air leakage. This randomized trial was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of an alternative ventilation strategy, namely the nasal airway ventilation technique, which involves the use of a nasal airway and a modified ventilation maneuver during anesthesia induction in edentulous patients. Eighty edentulous patients who underwent elective surgery with general anesthesia were randomly assigned to the nasal airway or facemask group. In the nasal airway group, a nasal airway was inserted and connected to the anesthesia ventilator, after which the mouth and nostrils were closed. In the facemask group, moistened gauzes were used to improve the facemask seal against hollow cheeks and the "VE-clamp" technique was applied for facemask ventilation. The primary outcome was the expired tidal volume during anesthesia induction. The expired tidal volume during anesthesia induction was significantly increased in the nasal airway group (median 5.6 mL/kg, interquartile range 5.0-5.9), compared with the facemask group (median 3.6 mL/kg, interquartile range 2.6-4.5), with a median difference of 1.9 mL/kg (95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 2.3; P < 0.001). A higher incidence of successful ventilation by a single anesthetist is observed in the nasal airway group than in the facemask group during anesthesia induction (100 vs. 82.5%; P = 0.018). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between groups. Our findings demonstrated that the nasal airway ventilation technique significantly and safely improved ventilation during anesthesia induction in edentulous patients. Thus, this technique can serve as a valuable alternative when facemask ventilation is inadequate in these patients.
无牙患者在麻醉诱导期间常经历面罩通气困难,主要原因是面罩密封不足和漏气。这项随机试验旨在确定一种替代通气策略的有效性和安全性,即鼻气道通气技术,该技术涉及在无牙患者麻醉诱导期间使用鼻气道和改良的通气操作。80例行择期全身麻醉手术的无牙患者被随机分为鼻气道组或面罩组。在鼻气道组中,插入鼻气道并连接至麻醉呼吸机,然后封闭口腔和鼻孔。在面罩组中,使用湿纱布改善面罩与凹陷脸颊的密封性,并应用“VE夹”技术进行面罩通气。主要结局是麻醉诱导期间的呼出潮气量。与面罩组(中位数3.6 mL/kg,四分位间距2.6 - 4.5)相比,鼻气道组麻醉诱导期间的呼出潮气量显著增加(中位数5.6 mL/kg,四分位间距5.0 - 5.9),中位数差异为1.9 mL/kg(95%置信区间,1.4至2.3;P < 0.001)。在麻醉诱导期间,鼻气道组由单一麻醉医生成功通气的发生率高于面罩组(100%对82.5%;P = 0.018)。两组间不良事件发生率无显著差异。我们的研究结果表明,鼻气道通气技术在无牙患者麻醉诱导期间显著且安全地改善了通气。因此,当这些患者面罩通气不足时,该技术可作为一种有价值的替代方法。