• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

比较两种常用双手面罩通气技术对无意识窒息肥胖成年患者的效果。

Comparison of effectiveness of two commonly used two-handed mask ventilation techniques on unconscious apnoeic obese adults.

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.

Department of Anaesthesiology.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 2017 Apr 1;118(4):618-624. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex035.

DOI:10.1093/bja/aex035
PMID:28403406
Abstract

BACKGROUND.: Mask ventilation and tracheal intubation are basic techniques for airway management and mutually inclusive rescue measures to restore ventilation. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of mask ventilation between two commonly used techniques of two-handed mask ventilation in obese unconscious apnoeic adults.

METHODS.: Eighty-one obese adults received mask ventilation after induction using C-E clamp and modified V-E clamp techniques in a randomized crossover manner. Mechanical ventilation was provided using a pressure-control mode, at a rate of 10 bpm, with an inspiratory-to-expiratory time ratio of 1:2 and a pre-set plateau airway pressure of 20 cm H 2 O. The primary outcome was expired tidal volume.

RESULTS.: The BMI for the subjects was 37 ( sd 4.9) kg m -2 . The failure rates for mask ventilation (tidal volume≤anatomical dead space) were 44% for the C-E technique and 0% for the V-E technique ( P <0.001). Tidal volume was significantly lower for the C-E than the V-E technique [371 ( sd 345) vs 720 (244) ml, P <0.001]. The peak airway pressures were 21 ( sd 1.5) cm H 2 O for the C-E technique and 21 (1.3) cm H 2 O for the V-E technique.

CONCLUSIONS.: Mask ventilation using the modified V-E technique is more effective than with the C-E technique in unconscious obese apnoeic adults. Subjects who fail ventilation with the C-E technique can be ventilated effectively with the V-E technique.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION.: NCT02580526.

摘要

背景

面罩通气和气管插管是气道管理的基本技术,也是相互包容的恢复通气的抢救措施。本研究旨在比较两种常用的双手面罩通气技术在肥胖无意识窒息成人中的面罩通气效果。

方法

81 名肥胖成年人在诱导后采用 C-E 夹和改良 V-E 夹技术以随机交叉方式接受面罩通气。机械通气采用压力控制模式,呼吸频率为 10 次/分,吸呼比为 1:2,预设平台气道压为 20cmH2O。主要结局为呼气潮气量。

结果

受试者的 BMI 为 37(sd4.9)kg/m2。C-E 技术面罩通气失败率(潮气量≤解剖死腔)为 44%,V-E 技术为 0%(P<0.001)。C-E 技术的潮气量明显低于 V-E 技术[371(sd345)vs720(244)ml,P<0.001]。C-E 技术的气道峰压为 21(sd1.5)cmH2O,V-E 技术为 21(1.3)cmH2O。

结论

在无意识肥胖窒息的成年人中,改良的 V-E 技术的面罩通气比 C-E 技术更有效。C-E 技术通气失败的患者可以通过 V-E 技术有效通气。

临床试验注册号

NCT02580526。

相似文献

1
Comparison of effectiveness of two commonly used two-handed mask ventilation techniques on unconscious apnoeic obese adults.比较两种常用双手面罩通气技术对无意识窒息肥胖成年患者的效果。
Br J Anaesth. 2017 Apr 1;118(4):618-624. doi: 10.1093/bja/aex035.
2
A two-handed jaw-thrust technique is superior to the one-handed "EC-clamp" technique for mask ventilation in the apneic unconscious person.双手抬颌法优于单手“EC 手法”在意识丧失伴呼吸暂停患者的面罩通气。
Anesthesiology. 2010 Oct;113(4):873-9. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181ec6414.
3
Continuous positive airway pressure and ventilation are more effective with a nasal mask than a full face mask in unconscious subjects: a randomized controlled trial.持续气道正压通气在昏迷患者中使用鼻罩比全面罩更有效:一项随机对照试验。
Crit Care. 2013 Dec 23;17(6):R300. doi: 10.1186/cc13169.
4
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two-Handed Mask Ventilation Techniques (C-E versus V-E) in Obese Patients Requiring General Anesthesia in an Indian Population.印度人群中需要全身麻醉的肥胖患者双手面罩通气技术(C-E与V-E)有效性的比较
Anesth Essays Res. 2022 Jan-Mar;16(1):167-171. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_59_22. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
5
Comparison of the Effectiveness and Comfort Level of Two Commonly Used Mask Ventilation Techniques in a Model.两种常用面罩通气技术在模型中的效果和舒适度比较。
Respir Care. 2021 Mar;66(3):460-465. doi: 10.4187/respcare.07949. Epub 2020 Aug 11.
6
Mechanical versus manual ventilation via a face mask during the induction of anesthesia: a prospective, randomized, crossover study.麻醉诱导期间通过面罩进行机械通气与手动通气的比较:一项前瞻性、随机、交叉研究。
Anesth Analg. 2004 Jan;98(1):260-263. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000096190.36875.67.
7
Physiological dead space/tidal volume ratio during face mask, laryngeal mask, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway spontaneous ventilation.面罩、喉罩以及带套囊口咽气道自主通气时的生理死腔/潮气量比值
J Clin Anesth. 1998 Dec;10(8):652-5. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(98)00108-1.
8
Comparison of bag-valve-mask hand-sealing techniques in a simulated model.模拟模型中不同球囊面罩手卫生技术的比较。
Ann Emerg Med. 2014 Jan;63(1):6-12.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.07.014. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
9
The effect of head rotation on efficiency of face mask ventilation in anaesthetised apnoeic adults: A randomised, crossover study.头位转动对全麻无通气患者面罩通气效率的影响:一项随机交叉研究。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017 Jul;34(7):432-440. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000582.
10
Face mask ventilation: a comparison of three techniques.面罩通气:三种技术的比较
J Emerg Med. 2013 May;44(5):1028-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.11.005. Epub 2013 Mar 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A randomized controlled trial of nasal airway ventilation technique in edentulous patients during anesthesia induction.无牙患者麻醉诱导期间鼻气道通气技术的随机对照试验
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 28;15(1):14828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-99789-w.
2
Evaluation of efficacy of two bag-mask ventilation techniques by novice airway providers: Two-handed CE versus dominant-hand CE-non-dominant-hand thenar eminence techniques - A randomised controlled trial.新手气道急救人员对两种袋面罩通气技术效果的评估:双手连续挤压法与优势手连续挤压-非优势手大鱼际肌法——一项随机对照试验。
Indian J Anaesth. 2024 Nov;68(11):1010-1015. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_387_23. Epub 2024 Oct 26.
3
German guidelines for airway management 2023.
《2023年德国气道管理指南》
Anaesthesiologie. 2024 May 16. doi: 10.1007/s00101-024-01413-5.
4
Comparison of Effectiveness of CE Technique and Jaw Thrust Technique for Mask Ventilation on Apneic Anesthetized Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.CE技术与下颌前推技术用于麻醉状态下呼吸暂停成年患者面罩通气的效果比较:一项随机对照试验
Anesth Essays Res. 2022 Jul-Sep;16(3):386-391. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_110_22. Epub 2022 Dec 9.
5
Comparing the efficacy of modified thenar eminence technique with conventional thenar eminence technique of mask ventilation during induction of general anaesthesia - A randomised crossover study.比较改良大鱼际肌技术与传统大鱼际肌技术在全身麻醉诱导期间面罩通气的疗效——一项随机交叉研究。
Indian J Anaesth. 2022 Oct;66(10):694-699. doi: 10.4103/ija.ija_91_22. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
6
Comparison of the Effectiveness of Two-Handed Mask Ventilation Techniques (C-E versus V-E) in Obese Patients Requiring General Anesthesia in an Indian Population.印度人群中需要全身麻醉的肥胖患者双手面罩通气技术(C-E与V-E)有效性的比较
Anesth Essays Res. 2022 Jan-Mar;16(1):167-171. doi: 10.4103/aer.aer_59_22. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
7
Facemask ventilation.面罩通气
BJA Educ. 2022 Jan;22(1):5-11. doi: 10.1016/j.bjae.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Dec 3.
8
Canadian Airway Focus Group updated consensus-based recommendations for management of the difficult airway: part 1. Difficult airway management encountered in an unconscious patient.加拿大气道焦点小组更新了基于共识的困难气道管理推荐意见:第 1 部分。意识丧失患者中遇到的困难气道管理。
Can J Anaesth. 2021 Sep;68(9):1373-1404. doi: 10.1007/s12630-021-02007-0. Epub 2021 Jun 18.
9
Mallet finger in an anaesthetist following tracheal intubation.气管插管后麻醉医生出现锤状指。
Anaesth Rep. 2020 Oct 16;8(2):127-130. doi: 10.1002/anr3.12073. eCollection 2020 Jul-Dec.
10
[Safety sequence intubation: the 10 "Ps" algorithm and cognitive aid for airway management in COVID-19 patients].[安全顺序插管:COVID-19患者气道管理的10个“P”算法及认知辅助工具]
Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020 Nov-Dec;70(6):689-691. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.10.001. Epub 2020 Oct 22.