Kwast Stefan, Lässing Johannes, Falz Roberto, Hoffmann Jana, Pökel Christoph, Schulze Antina, Schröter Thomas, Borger Michael, Busse Martin
Institute of Sports Medicine and Prevention, University Leipzig, Rosa-Luxemburg-Str. 30, 04103, Leipzig, Germany.
Department of Exercise Science and Sports Medicine, University Halle-Wittenberg, Von-Seckendorff-Platz 2, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Apr 28;17(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s13102-025-01145-y.
Impaired exercise capacity influences obesity and diabetes disease progression and vice versa. The primary objective of this prospective, observational, real-world study was to characterize exercise capacity in patients with obesity or type II diabetes mellitus and healthy controls by cardiac capacity (cardiac output (CO), cardiac power output (CPO)) and peripheral muscle capacity (peak power output (Pmax) and arterio-venous oxygen difference (avDO2)). The effects of an exercise and lifestyle intervention on these cardiac and peripheral muscular markers in obese and diabetic patient groups were additionally evaluated.
At a university sports medicine outpatient clinic, 24 obese (OB) and 38 diabetes mellitus type II (DM) patients and 20 healthy controls (HE) were investigated in a cross-sectional analysis. OB and DM were reexamined after a standard of care exercise intervention. Parameters were assessed at rest and during a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Blood pressure, impedance cardiography, and respiratory gas analysis were continuously recorded during CPET.
At Pmax, CO and CPO were lower in DM compared to obese (CO 16.26 l/min vs. 18.13 l/min, p < 0.04; CPO 5.67 W vs. 4.81 W, p < 0.01). HE did not differ in CO (18.19 l/min)) or CPO (5.27 W) from OB and DM. Maximum CPO in OB and DM was based on higher stroke volume and blood pressure, while HE had higher heart rates. Pmax was higher (p < 0.01) in HE (268 W) compared to OB (108 W) and DM (89 W), mainly caused by a higher (p < 0.01) avDO (HE 18.22 ml/dl, OB 10.45 ml/dl, DM 9.65 ml/dl). Exercise intervention improved Pmax in both groups of patients (+ 16 W in OB, + 12 W in DM), which was attributed to increased avDO, but not to cardiac parameters.
Obese patients had higher cardiac power outputs and were primarily limited by muscular performance, while diabetic patients showed both muscular and cardiac limitations. Healthy subjects had comparable cardiac power outputs with significantly lower pressure-volume loads. Resistance training improved the alteration of our patient groups in exercise capacity. Future research is needed to interpret our findings regarding clinical endpoints, such as mortality and hospitalization.
The study was retrograde registered in the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00032545, 24.08.2023).
运动能力受损会影响肥胖症和糖尿病的疾病进展,反之亦然。这项前瞻性、观察性、真实世界研究的主要目的是通过心功能(心输出量(CO)、心力输出量(CPO))和外周肌肉功能(最大功率输出(Pmax)和动静脉氧差(avDO2))来描述肥胖或2型糖尿病患者以及健康对照者的运动能力。此外,还评估了运动和生活方式干预对肥胖和糖尿病患者组这些心脏和外周肌肉指标的影响。
在一家大学运动医学门诊,对24名肥胖(OB)患者、38名2型糖尿病(DM)患者和20名健康对照者(HE)进行了横断面分析。在进行标准护理运动干预后,对OB和DM患者进行了复查。在静息状态和心肺运动试验(CPET)期间评估各项参数。在CPET期间持续记录血压、阻抗心动图和呼吸气体分析结果。
在Pmax时,DM患者的CO和CPO低于肥胖患者(CO分别为16.26升/分钟和18.13升/分钟,p<0.04;CPO分别为5.67瓦和4.81瓦,p<0.01)。HE的CO(18.19升/分钟)和CPO(5.27瓦)与OB和DM患者无差异。OB和DM患者的最大CPO基于较高的每搏输出量和血压,而HE的心率较高。与OB(108瓦)和DM(89瓦)相比,HE的Pmax更高(p<0.01)(268瓦),这主要是由于avDO更高(p<0.01)(HE为18.22毫升/分升,OB为10.45毫升/分升,DM为9.65毫升/分升)。运动干预使两组患者的Pmax均有所改善(OB组增加16瓦,DM组增加12瓦),这归因于avDO的增加,而非心脏参数的变化。
肥胖患者的心输出功率较高,主要受肌肉功能限制,而糖尿病患者则同时存在肌肉和心脏功能限制。健康受试者的心输出功率相当,压力-容量负荷明显较低。阻力训练改善了我们患者组的运动能力变化。需要进一步的研究来解读我们关于临床终点(如死亡率和住院率)的研究结果。
该研究在德国临床试验注册中心进行了追溯注册(DRKS00032545,2023年8月24日)。