Safarzadeh Ameneh
University of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA, USA.
Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 28;24(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02488-1.
Black maternal mortality in the United States remains alarmingly high-Black women are still more than three times as likely to die from pregnancy-related causes than White women. This crisis is not due to individual choices or access alone, but to deeply rooted structural inequities, including systemic racism, policy exclusion, and the neglect of Black-led care models. While efforts like Medicaid expansion and the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act aim to address these gaps, they often fall short by relying on narrow, one-size-fits-all solutions. This commentary uses Critical Health Equity theory and the Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis (IBPA) framework to examine how current policies may unintentionally reinforce the very inequities they seek to eliminate. It argues that achieving real equity in maternal health requires more than reform-it calls for a fundamental shift in who holds power, whose knowledge is valued, and how care is delivered. A new framework is proposed that centers Black leadership, supports community-led research, and promotes culturally safe, justice-oriented care.
美国黑人孕产妇死亡率仍然高得惊人——黑人女性死于与妊娠相关原因的可能性仍然是白人女性的三倍多。这场危机并非仅仅源于个人选择或医疗服务可及性问题,而是源于根深蒂固的结构性不平等,包括系统性种族主义、政策排斥以及对黑人主导的护理模式的忽视。虽然像医疗补助扩大计划和《黑人孕产妇健康综合法案》等举措旨在解决这些差距,但它们往往因依赖狭隘的、一刀切的解决方案而效果不佳。本评论运用批判性健康公平理论和基于交叉性的政策分析(IBPA)框架,审视当前政策可能如何在无意中强化了它们试图消除的不平等现象。文章认为,要在孕产妇健康方面实现真正的公平,需要的不仅仅是改革——它要求在权力归属、何种知识受到重视以及护理如何提供等方面发生根本性转变。本文提出了一个新框架,该框架以黑人领导力为核心,支持社区主导的研究,并促进具有文化安全性、以正义为导向的护理。