Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, United States.
Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Front Public Health. 2023 Aug 16;11:1040851. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1040851. eCollection 2023.
Few guidelines exist for the development of socially responsible health policy, and frameworks that balance considerations of data, strategy, and equity are limited. The Intersectionality-Based Policy Analysis (IBPA) framework utilizes a structured questioning process to consider problems and policies, while applying guiding principles of equity, social justice, power, intersectionality, and diversity of knowledge and input. We apply the IBPA framework's guiding principles and questions to the pre-vaccine U.S. COVID-19 policy response. Results suggest the IBPA approach is a promising tool for integrating equity considerations in the development of policy solutions to urgent US public health challenges, including the COVID-19 pandemic. We found the IBPA framework particularly useful in differentiating between problems or policies and representations of problems or policies, and in considering the impacts of representations on different groups. The explicit inclusion of short-, medium- and long-term solutions is a reminder of the importance of holding a long-term vision of the equitable public health system we want while working towards immediate change.
制定对社会负责的卫生政策的指导方针很少,兼顾数据、战略和公平性的框架也很有限。基于交叉性的政策分析(IBPA)框架利用结构化的提问过程来考虑问题和政策,同时应用公平、社会正义、权力、交叉性以及知识和投入多样性的指导原则。我们将 IBPA 框架的指导原则和问题应用于疫苗前美国 COVID-19 政策应对。结果表明,IBPA 方法是将公平性考虑纳入解决美国紧迫公共卫生挑战(包括 COVID-19 大流行)的政策解决方案制定中的一种有前途的工具。我们发现,IBPA 框架特别有助于区分问题或政策与问题或政策的表示形式,以及考虑表示形式对不同群体的影响。明确纳入短期、中期和长期解决方案,提醒人们在努力实现即时变革的同时,牢记我们想要的公平公共卫生系统的长期愿景的重要性。