Suppr超能文献

了解患者通往母婴病房的路径:英国一项纵向回顾性服务评估

Understanding patient pathways to Mother and Baby Units: a longitudinal retrospective service evaluation in the UK.

作者信息

Jovanović Nikolina, Lep Žan, Berrisford Giles, Dirik Aysegul, Barber Julia, Kelani Bukola, Protti Olivia

机构信息

Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

East London NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.

出版信息

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jul 16:1-17. doi: 10.3310/GDVS2427.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mother and Baby Units are specialised psychiatric facilities for women during and after pregnancy. In the United Kingdom, efforts have been made to expand the Mother and Baby Unit availability and establish care guidelines. However, the accessibility of these services for ethnic minority women remains relatively unexplored despite well-documented disparities.

AIMS

To explore patient pathways to Mother and Baby Units in three UK localities, with a focus on variations in pathways between services and among ethnic groups.

METHODS

This is a three-site, longitudinal retrospective service evaluation conducted in Birmingham, London and Nottingham during a 12-month period (1 January-31 December 2019). Electronic records were accessed to extract data on the type of admission, the referral process and the type of pathway (simple or complex). The simple pathway entailed contact with one clinician/service prior to admission to the Mother and Baby Unit, while the complex pathway involved interactions with two or more clinicians/services before Mother and Baby Unit admission. Data were collected using the adapted World Health Organization Encounter form and were analysed using uni- and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Electronic records from 198 patients were analysed, with participants distributed proportionally across three sites: Birmingham ( = 70, 35.4%), London ( = 62, 31.3%) and Nottingham ( = 66, 33.3%). All Mother and Baby Units were nationally commissioned and received referrals from across England. Most patients were in the post partum period, admitted for the first time through emergency, informal and complex pathways. The average length of admission was 6 weeks. Significant differences in admission characteristics were observed between services. Patients of Asian ethnicity had more emergency admissions compared to those of Black and White ethnicities. Ethnicity was the only significant factor associated with the simple/complex care pathway. After controlling for pathway-level and patient-level factors, Black patients were 6.24 times less likely to experience a complex care pathway than White patients. No evidence was found that patients from the Black ethnic background are detained more often than White patients.

LIMITATIONS

The heterogeneity among categorised ethnic groups, data extracted solely from electronic records without validation through patients' personal accounts of their care pathways, unanalysed declined referrals and the utilisation of pre-COVID-19 pandemic data. The ethnic composition of the study sample matched that of the UK maternity population in the Nottingham subsample, but Black and Asian populations were over-represented in the Birmingham and London subsamples.

CONCLUSION

The study provides valuable insights into patient journeys to Mother and Baby Units, highlighting significant differences between services. It also emphasises the role of ethnicity in care pathways. For example, Black patients were less likely to encounter more than two services before Mother and Baby Unit admission, suggesting either more direct access to specialist care or insufficient community-based interventions. This dual interpretation calls for future research to explore whether pathway differences among ethnic groups result from optimal clinical decision-making or gaps in care provision.

FUTURE WORK

Should further examine the role of ethnicity in shaping care pathways; explore the link between care pathway types and treatment outcomes; investigate if simple or complex pathways result from optimal clinical decisions or gaps in the healthcare system and explore admissions to general wards versus Mother and Baby Units and transitions between these units.

FUNDING

This article presents independent research funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health and Social Care Delivery Research programme as award number 17/105/14.

摘要

背景

母婴单元是为孕期及产后女性提供的专业精神科设施。在英国,已努力扩大母婴单元的可及性并制定护理指南。然而,尽管存在充分记录的差异,但少数民族女性获得这些服务的情况仍相对未得到充分探索。

目的

探讨英国三个地区母婴单元的患者就医途径,重点关注不同服务之间以及不同种族群体之间就医途径的差异。

方法

这是一项在伯明翰、伦敦和诺丁汉进行的为期12个月(2019年1月1日至12月31日)的三地点纵向回顾性服务评估。通过电子记录提取入院类型、转诊过程和就医途径类型(简单或复杂)的数据。简单途径是指在入住母婴单元之前与一名临床医生/服务机构接触,而复杂途径则是指在入住母婴单元之前与两名或更多临床医生/服务机构进行互动。使用改编后的世界卫生组织会诊表格收集数据,并进行单变量和多变量分析。

结果

分析了198名患者的电子记录,参与者按比例分布在三个地点:伯明翰(n = 70,35.4%)、伦敦(n = 62,31.3%)和诺丁汉(n = 66,33.3%)。所有母婴单元均由国家委托,并接收来自英格兰各地的转诊。大多数患者处于产后阶段,首次通过紧急、非正式和复杂途径入院。平均住院时间为6周。不同服务之间观察到入院特征存在显著差异。与黑人和白人种族的患者相比,亚洲种族的患者急诊入院更多。种族是与简单/复杂护理途径相关的唯一显著因素。在控制了途径层面和患者层面的因素后,黑人患者经历复杂护理途径的可能性比白人患者低6.24倍。没有证据表明黑人种族背景的患者比白人患者被拘留的频率更高。

局限性

分类种族群体之间的异质性、仅从电子记录中提取数据而未通过患者对其护理途径的个人描述进行验证、未分析被拒绝的转诊以及使用COVID-19大流行前的数据。研究样本的种族构成在诺丁汉子样本中与英国产妇人群相匹配,但在伯明翰和伦敦子样本中黑人和亚洲人群的比例过高。

结论

该研究为母婴单元的患者就医过程提供了有价值的见解,突出了不同服务之间的显著差异。它还强调了种族在护理途径中的作用。例如,黑人患者在入住母婴单元之前遇到超过两个服务机构的可能性较小,这表明要么更容易直接获得专科护理,要么社区干预不足。这种双重解释需要未来的研究来探讨种族群体之间的途径差异是源于最佳临床决策还是护理提供方面的差距。

未来工作

应进一步研究种族在塑造护理途径中的作用;探索护理途径类型与治疗结果之间的联系;调查简单或复杂途径是由最佳临床决策还是医疗保健系统中的差距导致的,并探索入住普通病房与母婴单元的情况以及这些单元之间的转诊。

资金

本文介绍了由国家卫生与保健研究所(NIHR)卫生与社会保健交付研究计划资助的独立研究,资助编号为17/105/14。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验