Vinciguerra Alessandro, Taboni Stefano, Bettini Pierfrancesco, Turri-Zanoni Mario, Verillaud Benjamin, Chatelet Florian, Castelnuovo Paolo, Nicolai Piero, Bresson Damien, Battaglia Paolo, Ferrari Marco, Herman Philippe
Otorhinolaryngology and Skull Base Center, AP-HP, Hospital Lariboisière, Paris, France.
Unit of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Azienda Ospedale-Università Padova, Padova, Italy.
Head Neck. 2025 Sep;47(9):2603-2610. doi: 10.1002/hed.28161. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
Scalp flaps are a cornerstone in skull base (SB) reconstruction thanks to their rich vascularization, large volume, and extra-nasal location. Among them, the pericranial flap (PF) and temporoparietal fascial flap (TPFF) are the most frequently applied. However, in the majority of cases, they result in being mutually exclusive based on the standard surgical technique to harvest them. The aim of this manuscript is to validate the concept of anatomical and thus surgical independence between the TPFF and PF through the analysis of topographic anatomy and description of challenging cases in which these scalp flaps were used.
In this multicentric retrospective study, we have selected cases of SB reconstruction with TPFF and/or PF, for which the independence of underlying vascular and topographic anatomy has been exploited. Three different scenarios were encountered: (1) TPFF harvested after a coronal approach; (2) PF harvested with preservation of the TPFF pedicle; (3) Simultaneous harvesting of TPFF and PF. Data on surgical morbidity and outcomes were collected.
None of the 5 patients included in the study experienced flap or scalp necrosis, or perioperative adverse events, thus supporting the independent viability (or vascularization) of the 2 flaps. In all cases, an adequate SB reconstruction was achieved.
The TPFF and PF are SB reconstructive solutions that can be applied independently thanks to their anatomical and vascular structure. This evidence expands the applicability and versatility of these regional flaps.
由于头皮瓣血管丰富、体积大且位于鼻外,因此是颅底(SB)重建的基石。其中,颅骨膜瓣(PF)和颞顶筋膜瓣(TPFF)应用最为频繁。然而,在大多数情况下,根据标准手术技术获取这两种头皮瓣时,它们往往相互排斥。本手稿的目的是通过分析局部解剖结构并描述使用这些头皮瓣的具有挑战性的病例,来验证TPFF和PF在解剖学上以及手术上的独立性概念。
在这项多中心回顾性研究中,我们选择了使用TPFF和/或PF进行SB重建的病例,这些病例利用了其潜在血管和局部解剖结构的独立性。遇到了三种不同的情况:(1)经冠状切口获取TPFF;(2)在保留TPFF蒂的情况下获取PF;(3)同时获取TPFF和PF。收集了手术发病率和结果的数据。
纳入研究的5例患者均未出现皮瓣或头皮坏死,也未出现围手术期不良事件,从而支持了这两种皮瓣的独立存活能力(或血管化)。在所有病例中,均实现了充分的SB重建。
由于其解剖结构和血管结构,TPFF和PF是可独立应用的SB重建解决方案。这一证据扩展了这些局部皮瓣的适用性和多功能性。