• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

揭示机器人辅助手术在妇科领域的真正益处:从远程手术到图像引导手术及人工智能。

Unveiling the real benefits of robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology: from telesurgery to image-guided surgery and artificial intelligence.

作者信息

Pavone Matteo, Goglia Marta, Rosati Andrea, Innocenzi Chiara, Bizzarri Nicolò, Seeliger Barbara, Mascagni Pietro, Ferrari Filippo Alberto, Forgione Antonello, Testa Antonia Carla, Fagotti Anna, Fanfani Francesco, Querleu Denis, Scambia Giovanni, Akladios Cherif, Marescaux Jacques, Lecointre Lise

机构信息

IRCAD France Research Institute Against Digestive Cancer, Strasbourg, France.

Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, IHU Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.

出版信息

Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2025 Mar 28;17(1):50-60. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.2024.13522.

DOI:10.52054/FVVO.2024.13522
PMID:40297947
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12042076/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several new robotic platforms are being commercialised, with different features in terms of types of consoles, numbers of arms, and targeting transabdominal or natural orifice approaches. The benefits of robotic surgery over laparoscopy have yet to be conclusively demonstrated in gynaecology, as several studies comparing perioperative and postoperative patient outcomes have reported no significant differences, leading to a lack of precise recommendations in surgical guidelines for both gynaecologic oncology and benign gynaecology. In addition, these outcomes must be balanced against the high costs of robotic surgery, in particular when considering building an infrastructure for safe telesurgery to democratise access to telementoring and remote interventions.

OBJECTIVES

Drawing from the expertise gained at the IRCAD Research and Training Center in Strasbourg, France, this article aims to provide an overview of the unveiled benefits of robotic-assisted surgery in gynaecology, investigating the role of digital surgery integration.

METHODS

The objective of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the latest advancement in digital robotic-assisted surgery in gynaecology and illustrate the benefits of this approach related to the easiest integration with new technologies. To illustrate such evidence, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases were searched.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

In the era of surgical innovation and digital surgery, the potential of robotic surgery becomes apparent through the capacity to integrate new technologies. Image-guided surgery techniques, including the analysis of preoperative and intraoperative images, 3D reconstructions and their use for virtual and augmented reality, and the availability of drop-in robotic ultrasound probes, can help to enhance the quality, efficacy and safety of surgical procedures.

RESULTS

The integration of artificial intelligence, particularly computer vision analysis of surgical workflows, is put forward to further reduce complications, enhance safety, and improve operating room efficiency. Additionally, new large language models can assist during procedures by providing patient history and aiding in decision-making. The education and training of young surgeons will undergo radical transformations with robotic surgery, with telementoring and shared procedures in the side-by-side double-console setup.

CONCLUSIONS

Robotic systems play a fundamental role in the transition towards digital surgery, aiming to improve patient care through integration of such new technologies.

WHAT IS NEW?: While the advantages of robotic surgery in terms of perioperative outcomes have yet to be demonstrated, the benefits of its easiest integration with new technologies are evident.

摘要

背景

几种新型机器人手术平台正在商业化,在控制台类型、手臂数量以及经腹或自然腔道入路方面具有不同特点。机器人手术相较于腹腔镜手术的优势在妇科领域尚未得到确凿证明,因为多项比较围手术期和术后患者结局的研究报告称二者无显著差异,导致妇科肿瘤学和良性妇科手术指南中缺乏精确建议。此外,这些结局必须与机器人手术的高昂成本相权衡,尤其是在考虑建立安全远程手术基础设施以普及远程指导和远程干预时。

目的

借鉴法国斯特拉斯堡IRCAD研究与培训中心积累的专业知识,本文旨在概述机器人辅助手术在妇科领域已揭示的益处,探讨数字手术整合的作用。

方法

本叙述性综述的目的是概述妇科数字机器人辅助手术的最新进展,并阐述这种方法与最易于与新技术整合相关的益处。为说明此类证据,检索了PubMed、谷歌学术和Scopus数据库。

主要观察指标

在手术创新和数字手术时代,机器人手术的潜力通过整合新技术的能力得以显现。图像引导手术技术,包括术前和术中图像分析、三维重建及其在虚拟现实和增强现实中的应用,以及可插入式机器人超声探头的可用性,有助于提高手术质量、疗效和安全性。

结果

人工智能的整合,尤其是手术工作流程的计算机视觉分析,被提出可进一步减少并发症、提高安全性并改善手术室效率。此外,新的大语言模型可在手术过程中通过提供患者病史和辅助决策提供帮助。年轻外科医生的教育和培训将因机器人手术而发生根本性变革,在并排双控制台设置中有远程指导和共享手术。

结论

机器人系统在向数字手术的转变中发挥着基础性作用,旨在通过整合此类新技术改善患者护理。

新进展

虽然机器人手术在围手术期结局方面的优势尚未得到证明,但其最易于与新技术整合的益处是明显的。

相似文献

1
Unveiling the real benefits of robot-assisted surgery in gynaecology: from telesurgery to image-guided surgery and artificial intelligence.揭示机器人辅助手术在妇科领域的真正益处:从远程手术到图像引导手术及人工智能。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2025 Mar 28;17(1):50-60. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.2024.13522.
2
Robotic-assisted minimally invasive surgery for gynecologic and urologic oncology: an evidence-based analysis.机器人辅助微创手术在妇科和泌尿外科肿瘤学中的应用:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(27):1-118. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
3
Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Surgery: A Review Bridging Innovation and Clinical Practice for the Next Generation of Surgical Care.胸外科中的人工智能:一篇将创新与下一代外科护理临床实践相联系的综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Apr 16;14(8):2729. doi: 10.3390/jcm14082729.
4
Robotic platforms in gynaecological surgery: past, present, and future.妇科手术中的机器人平台:过去、现在与未来。
Facts Views Vis Obgyn. 2024 Jun;16(2):163-172. doi: 10.52054/FVVO.16.2.024.
5
Artificial Intelligence in Urologic Robotic Oncologic Surgery: A Narrative Review.泌尿外科机器人肿瘤手术中的人工智能:一篇叙述性综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 May 4;16(9):1775. doi: 10.3390/cancers16091775.
6
Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for deep endometriosis: a meta-analysis of current evidence.机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗深部子宫内膜异位症:当前证据的荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 16;18(1):212. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01954-2.
7
Triple-console robotic telesurgery: first impressions and future impact.三控制台机器人远程手术:初步印象与未来影响。
J Robot Surg. 2024 Oct 26;18(1):381. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-02141-z.
8
Ultrasound-guided robotic surgical procedures: a systematic review.超声引导机器人手术程序:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2359-2370. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10772-4. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
9
Artificial intelligence: revolutionizing robotic surgery: review.人工智能:变革机器人手术:综述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Aug 1;86(9):5401-5409. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002426. eCollection 2024 Sep.
10
Dynamic Augmented Reality Cues for Telementoring in Minimally Invasive Surgeries: Scoping Review.用于微创外科远程指导的动态增强现实提示:范围综述
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Feb 3;27:e63939. doi: 10.2196/63939.

引用本文的文献

1
Technological evolution and research frontiers of robot-assisted ultrasound examination: a bibliometric exploration.机器人辅助超声检查的技术演进与研究前沿:一项文献计量学探索
J Robot Surg. 2025 Sep 4;19(1):555. doi: 10.1007/s11701-025-02741-3.
2
Septic Shock in Hematological Malignancies: Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Outcomes.血液系统恶性肿瘤中的感染性休克:人工智能在预测预后中的作用。
Curr Oncol. 2025 Aug 10;32(8):450. doi: 10.3390/curroncol32080450.

本文引用的文献

1
Skill progress during a dedicated societal robotic surgery training curriculum including several robotic surgery platforms.在专门的社会机器人手术培训课程中取得的技能进展,包括多个机器人手术平台。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Sep;38(9):5405-5412. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11128-8. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
2
The vaginal route for minimally invasive surgery: a practical guide for general surgeons.微创外科手术的阴道途径:普通外科医生实用指南
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2025 Feb;34(1):78-87. doi: 10.1080/13645706.2024.2359707. Epub 2024 Jun 8.
3
Insights from telesurgery expert conference on recent clinical experience and current status of remote surgery.
远程手术近期临床经验与现状的远程手术专家会议洞察
J Robot Surg. 2024 Jun 4;18(1):240. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01984-w.
4
SAGES surgical data science task force: enhancing surgical innovation, education and quality improvement through data science.SAGES手术数据科学特别工作组:通过数据科学提升手术创新、教育与质量改进。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Jul;38(7):3489-3493. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10921-9. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
5
Knowledge, attitudes and practices of using Indocyanine Green (ICG) fluorescence in emergency surgery: an international web-based survey in the ARtificial Intelligence in Emergency and trauma Surgery (ARIES)-WSES project.在急诊外科中使用吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光的知识、态度和实践:人工智能在急诊和创伤外科(ARIES)-WSES 项目中的国际网络调查。
Updates Surg. 2024 Sep;76(5):1969-1981. doi: 10.1007/s13304-024-01853-z. Epub 2024 May 27.
6
Robotic assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for deep endometriosis: a meta-analysis of current evidence.机器人辅助与腹腔镜手术治疗深部子宫内膜异位症:当前证据的荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2024 May 16;18(1):212. doi: 10.1007/s11701-024-01954-2.
7
Artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in Abdominopelvic Surgery: A Systematic Review of Applications and Impact.人工智能和 ChatGPT 在腹盆腔手术中的应用及影响的系统评价
In Vivo. 2024 May-Jun;38(3):1009-1015. doi: 10.21873/invivo.13534.
8
Ultrasound-guided robotic surgical procedures: a systematic review.超声引导机器人手术程序:系统评价。
Surg Endosc. 2024 May;38(5):2359-2370. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10772-4. Epub 2024 Mar 21.
9
Indocyanine green fluorescence applied to gynecologic oncology: beyond sentinel lymph node.吲哚菁绿荧光在妇科肿瘤学中的应用:超越前哨淋巴结。
Int J Surg. 2024 Jun 1;110(6):3641-3653. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001318.
10
Robotic-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the management of obese patients with early endometrial cancer in the sentinel lymph node era: a randomized controlled study (RObese).机器人辅助与传统腹腔镜手术在哨兵淋巴结时代肥胖患者早期子宫内膜癌治疗中的比较:一项随机对照研究(RObese)。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2024 May 6;34(5):773-776. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-005197.