Harland Niklas, Johnen Liv, Avula Kamal T, Buzanich-Ladinig Andrea, Schwarz Lukas, Knoll Jasmin, Stenzl Arnulf, Aicher Wilhelm K
Center for Medical Research, University of Tuebingen Hospital, 72072 Tuebingen, Germany.
Clinical Centre for Population Medicine in Fish, Pig and Poultry, Clinical Department for Farm Animals and Food System Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, 1210 Vienna, Austria.
Biomedicines. 2025 Apr 9;13(4):917. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines13040917.
: Urethral sphincter muscle deficiency is the leading cause of stress urinary incontinence. Preclinical and clinical studies suggested that cell therapy may improve the situation. However, the overall efficacy of cell therapies did often not satisfy the patient's needs. We, therefore, investigated in a large animal model of incontinence if the localization of injected regenerative cells in the deficient urethral sphincter muscle correlated with the outcome. : Urethral sphincter insufficiency was induced in three cohorts of pigs and confirmed by urodynamics. Then, either myogenic progenitor cells (MPCs) or adipose tissue-derived stromal cells (ADSCs) were injected into the injured sphincter complex by Williams needle under visual using a cystoscope. Sham-treated animals served as controls. Functional sphincter muscle regeneration was monitored by urodynamics over 5 weeks of follow-up. The localization of the injected cells was investigated by histology of cryosections of the tissue targeted. : Injection of MPCs near the sphincter muscle yielded better functional recovery when compared to MPC injections in adjacent sides. By contrast, injection of ADSCs in the submucosal tissue adjacent to the muscle led to better regeneration when compared to ADSC injections into the sphincter muscle. After five weeks of follow-up, MPCs yielded an overall robust but not significant improvement when compared to mock-treated controls, while ADSC injections reached significance. : This small proof-of-principle study suggests that the clinical outcome of cell therapy for urinary incontinence depends on the choice of therapeutic cells and the precise localization of the cells in the tissue targeted as well.
尿道括约肌功能缺陷是压力性尿失禁的主要原因。临床前和临床研究表明,细胞疗法可能会改善这种情况。然而,细胞疗法的总体疗效往往不能满足患者的需求。因此,我们在一个大型尿失禁动物模型中研究了注射的再生细胞在尿道括约肌功能缺陷部位的定位是否与治疗结果相关。
在三组猪中诱导出尿道括约肌功能不全,并通过尿动力学进行确认。然后,在膀胱镜直视下,使用威廉姆斯针将肌源性祖细胞(MPCs)或脂肪组织来源的基质细胞(ADSCs)注入受损的括约肌复合体。接受假手术治疗的动物作为对照。在5周的随访期内,通过尿动力学监测括约肌功能的再生情况。通过对目标组织冷冻切片进行组织学检查来研究注射细胞的定位。
与在相邻部位注射MPCs相比,在括约肌肌肉附近注射MPCs能产生更好的功能恢复。相比之下,与将ADSCs注入括约肌肌肉相比,将ADSCs注入肌肉相邻的黏膜下组织能带来更好的再生效果。随访5周后,与假手术对照组相比,MPCs总体上有明显改善,但无统计学意义,而ADSCs注射则具有统计学意义。
这项小型原理验证研究表明,尿失禁细胞治疗的临床结果取决于治疗细胞的选择以及细胞在目标组织中的精确定位。