Kim Claire, Smith Sierra N, Gopalan Siddharth S, Kerwin Samuel R, Ballard Kaas, Perry Blair W, Smith Cara F, Saviola Anthony J, Adams Richard H, Mackessy Stephen P, Castoe Todd A
Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, TX, 76019, USA.
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Northern Colorado, Greely, CO, 80639, USA.
Toxicon. 2025 May;259:108376. doi: 10.1016/j.toxicon.2025.108376. Epub 2025 Apr 27.
Understanding the mechanisms by which organs and tissues evolve new physiological functions is central to understanding the evolution of novelty. This is particularly interesting in the context of related tissues that evolve specialized, yet complementary, functions. Snake venom glands are an attractive system to test hypotheses related to the evolution and specialization of novel physiological function, as these modified salivary glands have evolved over ∼60 MY to synthesize and store venom. Front-fanged venomous snakes (elapids and viperids) possess two types of venom glands: the main and accessory glands. The larger main gland produces greater quantities of venom toxins and has been studied extensively, while the smaller accessory gland has received less attention. Here, we explore gene expression differences between main and accessory venom glands across three rattlesnake species (Crotalus cerberus, C. oreganus concolor and C. viridis). Our findings indicate that accessory glands express most venom genes at significantly lower levels than the main gland, with a few exceptions that may represent biologically relevant contributions of accessory glands to venom. The two glands also exhibit distinct trans-regulatory environments that we link to key differences in their underlying physiology and secretory roles. Our results further suggest that two signaling pathways that regulate venom, the unfolded protein response (UPR) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK), show significantly lower activation in the accessory gland. These findings provide insight into the physiological and functional diversification of snake venom systems, highlighting how distinct glandular systems have evolved contrasting and complementary roles driven by distinct physiological and regulatory mechanisms.
理解器官和组织演化出新生理功能的机制是理解新特性演化的核心。在相关组织演化出专门但互补功能的背景下,这一点尤其有趣。蛇毒腺是一个有吸引力的系统,可用于检验与新生理功能的演化和特化相关的假设,因为这些经过改造的唾液腺在约6000万年的时间里演化出了合成和储存毒液的能力。前沟牙毒蛇(眼镜蛇科和蝰蛇科)拥有两种类型的毒腺:主腺和副腺。较大的主腺产生大量的毒液毒素,并且已经得到了广泛研究,而较小的副腺则较少受到关注。在这里,我们探讨了三种响尾蛇(角响尾蛇、俄勒冈响尾蛇同色亚种和西部菱斑响尾蛇)主毒腺和副毒腺之间的基因表达差异。我们的研究结果表明,除了少数可能代表副腺对毒液有生物学相关贡献的例外情况外,副腺中大多数毒液基因的表达水平明显低于主腺。这两种腺体还表现出不同的转录调控环境,我们将其与它们潜在的生理学和分泌作用的关键差异联系起来。我们的结果进一步表明,调节毒液的两条信号通路,即未折叠蛋白反应(UPR)和细胞外信号调节激酶(ERK),在副腺中的激活水平明显较低。这些发现为蛇毒系统的生理和功能多样化提供了见解,突出了不同的腺体系统如何通过不同的生理和调节机制演化出对比和互补的作用。