• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单纯性急性阑尾炎中抗生素与手术治疗的成本效用分析

Cost utility analysis of antibiotics compared with operative treatment in uncomplicated acute appendicitis.

作者信息

Poprom Napaphat, Pattanaprateep Oraluck, Wilasrusmee Chumpon, Rattanasiri Sasivimol, McKay Gareth J, Attia John, Thakkinstian Ammarin

机构信息

Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Rama VI Road, Bangkok, 10400, Thailand.

Faculty of Public Health, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):14963. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00111-5.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-025-00111-5
PMID:40301419
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12041463/
Abstract

Appendicitis is the most common acute abdominal condition affecting general surgical practice. Recently, conservative treatment with antibiotics has been considered as an alternative. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate if antibiotics could be cost-effective compared to laparoscopic appendectomy or open appendectomy. A prospective study was undertaken to estimate health-related quality of life for antibiotic and operative treatment, and to ascertain costs in a cohort. A societal perspective incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) at 1 year after surgery was estimated. A probabilistic sensitivity analyses was performed. ICERs were estimated comparisons between individual antibiotics, laparoscopic appendectomy, and open appendectomy in uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Antibiotics showed improved cost savings compared to operative treatments with an ICER of -113,973.09 USD per quality adjusted life year at 1 year. Based on one year findings, antibiotics represent a lower cost treatment option with better cost-utility compared to operative treatment options in uncomplicated acute appendicitis patients. As such, antibiotic treatment can be initially considered as an alternative option where resources are limited to minimize complication rates associated with operative treatments.

摘要

阑尾炎是普通外科最常见的急性腹部疾病。近来,抗生素保守治疗被视为一种替代方法。因此,本研究旨在评估与腹腔镜阑尾切除术或开腹阑尾切除术相比,抗生素治疗是否具有成本效益。开展了一项前瞻性研究,以评估抗生素治疗和手术治疗对健康相关生活质量的影响,并确定一个队列中的成本。估计了术后1年的社会视角增量成本效益比(ICER)。进行了概率敏感性分析。估计了单纯性急性阑尾炎中使用不同抗生素、腹腔镜阑尾切除术和开腹阑尾切除术之间的ICER。与手术治疗相比,抗生素治疗成本更低,术后1年的ICER为每质量调整生命年-113,973.09美元。基于1年的研究结果,对于单纯性急性阑尾炎患者,与手术治疗方案相比,抗生素治疗是一种成本更低且成本效益更好的治疗选择。因此,在资源有限的情况下,可首先考虑抗生素治疗,以尽量降低与手术治疗相关的并发症发生率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c28/12041463/d47117640e7f/41598_2025_111_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c28/12041463/96e85aec5337/41598_2025_111_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c28/12041463/098ba782dabb/41598_2025_111_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c28/12041463/d47117640e7f/41598_2025_111_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c28/12041463/96e85aec5337/41598_2025_111_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c28/12041463/098ba782dabb/41598_2025_111_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c28/12041463/d47117640e7f/41598_2025_111_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost utility analysis of antibiotics compared with operative treatment in uncomplicated acute appendicitis.单纯性急性阑尾炎中抗生素与手术治疗的成本效用分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Apr 29;15(1):14963. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-00111-5.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of initial nonoperative management versus emergency laparoscopic appendectomy for acute complicated appendicitis.初始非手术治疗与急诊腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性复杂性阑尾炎的成本效果分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Nov 9;20(1):1019. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05839-6.
3
Cost-Effectiveness of Nonoperative Management vs Upfront Laparoscopic Appendectomy for Pediatric Uncomplicated Appendicitis for 1 Year.非手术治疗与早期腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗小儿单纯性阑尾炎1年的成本效益分析
J Am Coll Surg. 2025 Mar 1;240(3):288-298. doi: 10.1097/XCS.0000000000001232. Epub 2025 Feb 14.
4
The cost-effectiveness of nonoperative management versus laparoscopic appendectomy for the treatment of acute, uncomplicated appendicitis in children.非手术治疗与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗儿童急性单纯性阑尾炎的成本效益分析
J Pediatr Surg. 2017 Jul;52(7):1135-1140. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.009. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
5
Cost effectiveness of nonoperative management versus laparoscopic appendectomy for acute uncomplicated appendicitis.非手术治疗与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的成本效益
Surgery. 2015 Sep;158(3):712-21. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.06.021. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
6
Cost analysis of antibiotic therapy versus appendectomy for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: 5-year results of the APPAC randomized clinical trial.抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的成本分析:APPAC 随机临床试验 5 年结果。
PLoS One. 2019 Jul 25;14(7):e0220202. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220202. eCollection 2019.
7
Outcomes and cost analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for treatment of acute appendicitis: 4-years experience in a district hospital.腹腔镜与开腹阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的疗效及成本分析:一家区级医院的4年经验
BMC Surg. 2014 Mar 19;14:14. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-14-14.
8
Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis.阑尾切除术与抗生素治疗急性阑尾炎的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 29;4(4):CD015038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015038.pub2.
9
Economic evaluation of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy for the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis from the APPAC randomized clinical trial.APPAC 随机临床试验中抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的经济学评价。
Br J Surg. 2017 Sep;104(10):1355-1361. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10575. Epub 2017 Jul 5.
10
A prospective randomized controlled multicenter trial comparing antibiotic therapy with appendectomy in the treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis (APPAC trial).一项比较抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的前瞻性随机对照多中心试验(APPAC试验)。
BMC Surg. 2013 Feb 8;13:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2482-13-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Cost-Utility Analysis of Antibiotic Therapy versus Appendicectomy for Acute Uncomplicated Appendicitis.抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗急性单纯性阑尾炎的成本-效用分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 11;18(16):8473. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168473.
2
Laparoscopy in Low-Income Countries: 10-Year Experience and Systematic Literature Review.腹腔镜技术在低收入国家的应用:10 年经验与系统文献回顾。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 May 28;18(11):5796. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18115796.
3
Effect of Oral Moxifloxacin vs Intravenous Ertapenem Plus Oral Levofloxacin for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC II Randomized Clinical Trial.
口服莫西沙星对比静脉注射厄他培南加口服左氧氟沙星治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的效果:APPAC II 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 26;325(4):353-362. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23525.
4
A Randomized Trial Comparing Antibiotics with Appendectomy for Appendicitis.抗生素与阑尾切除术治疗阑尾炎的随机对照试验。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Nov 12;383(20):1907-1919. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2014320. Epub 2020 Oct 5.
5
Comparison of postoperative complications between open and laparoscopic appendectomy: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.比较开腹和腹腔镜阑尾切除术术后并发症:系统评价和荟萃分析的伞式综述。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2020 Oct;89(4):813-820. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000002878.
6
Quality of Life and Patient Satisfaction at 7-Year Follow-up of Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.抗生素治疗与阑尾切除术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎 7 年随访的生活质量和患者满意度:一项随机临床试验的二次分析。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Apr 1;155(4):283-289. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.6028.
7
Alternative approaches for confounding adjustment in observational studies using weighting based on the propensity score: a primer for practitioners.使用基于倾向评分的加权法在观察性研究中进行混杂因素调整的替代方法:从业者入门指南
BMJ. 2019 Oct 23;367:l5657. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l5657.
8
Operative Versus Nonoperative Management of Appendicitis: A Long-Term Cost Effectiveness Analysis.阑尾炎的手术治疗与非手术治疗:一项长期成本效益分析。
MDM Policy Pract. 2019 Aug 17;4(2):2381468319866448. doi: 10.1177/2381468319866448. eCollection 2019 Jul-Dec.
9
The efficacy of antibiotic treatment versus surgical treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial.抗生素治疗与手术治疗单纯性急性阑尾炎的疗效比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的网络荟萃分析。
Am J Surg. 2019 Jul;218(1):192-200. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2018.10.009. Epub 2018 Oct 9.
10
The EQ-5D-5L Valuation study in Thailand.泰国的EQ-5D-5L估值研究。
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2018 Oct;18(5):551-558. doi: 10.1080/14737167.2018.1494574. Epub 2018 Jul 6.