• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成年患者不同下颌偏斜模式下面部软组织特征的比较。

Comparisons of facial soft tissue characteristics in adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns.

作者信息

Macari Anthony T, Hanna Antoine E, Chekie Michelle El

机构信息

Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Department of Dentofacial Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut- Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon.

Clinical associate, Division of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, Department of Dentofacial Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut- Lebanon, Beirut, Lebanon.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06054-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-025-06054-7
PMID:40301810
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12042354/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The alignment of craniofacial structures in three dimensions-transverse, vertical, and sagittal-determines facial esthetics. While skeletal and dental factors influence these outcomes, soft tissue characteristics, especially facial soft tissue (FST) thickness, are increasingly recognized as important. However, few studies have examined the impact of vertical facial divergence on soft tissue variation, particularly in the middle and lower thirds of the face.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the association between vertical facial divergence and facial soft tissue characteristics of lower and upper thirds in adult patients.

METHODS

A total of 120 non-growing individuals (60 men, 60 women) with an average age of 27.87 years (range: 18-56) seeking orthodontic treatment were included. Participants were stratified into four groups based on mandibular plane inclination to anterior cranial base (MP/SN): Group 1: MP-SN ≤ 27°, group 2: 27°< MP-SN ≤ 32º, group 3: 32°< MP-SN < 37°, and group 4: MP-SN ≥ 37°. Lateral cephalometric radiographs were used to measure FST thickness in the horizontal plane at specific anatomical landmarks, including the base of the forehead, nose, lips, and chin. Additionally, lip length, chin projection, and angular inclinations were assessed. Group comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA followed by the post-hoc Benferroni test. The strength of the linear relationship between variables was investigated using the Pearson correlation test. Statistical significance was set at p = 0.05.

RESULTS

Significant differences in facial soft tissue characteristics were observed across groups. Hyperdivergent individuals (Group 4) exhibited significantly (p < 0.001) increased total facial height (TFH), lower facial height (LFH), and longer upper and lower lips compared to hypodivergent individuals (Group 1). Group 4 also had thinner soft tissue (p < 0.001) at the chin (Gn-Gn' and Me-Me'). Shallower mental sulcus and more obtuse chin angle existed in Group 4. Gender differences were noted in chin extension and throat angle. Positive correlations were found between MP/SN and various soft tissue measurements, including lip length and chin projection. No statistically significant differences were observed among the four groups in the upper face neither in linear nor in angular measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Vertical facial divergence significantly influences soft tissue characteristics, particularly in the lower third of the face. Hyperdivergent individuals exhibit increased lip length and reduced chin thickness. Nose length and projection did not differ between the different divergent groups. These findings have clinical implications for orthodontic treatment planning, highlighting the need for individualized approaches based on vertical facial patterns.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc1/12042354/846b178d4eab/12903_2025_6054_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc1/12042354/846b178d4eab/12903_2025_6054_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dc1/12042354/846b178d4eab/12903_2025_6054_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

背景

颅面结构在横向、垂直和矢状三个维度上的排列决定了面部美学。虽然骨骼和牙齿因素会影响这些结果,但软组织特征,尤其是面部软组织(FST)厚度,越来越被认为很重要。然而,很少有研究探讨垂直面部差异对软组织变化的影响,特别是在面部的中下部。

目的

本研究旨在评估成年患者垂直面部差异与上下面部三分之一的面部软组织特征之间的关联。

方法

共纳入120名寻求正畸治疗的非生长型个体(60名男性,60名女性),平均年龄27.87岁(范围:18 - 56岁)。根据下颌平面相对于前颅底的倾斜度(MP/SN)将参与者分为四组:第1组:MP - SN≤27°,第2组:27°<MP - SN≤32°,第3组:32°<MP - SN<37°,第4组:MP - SN≥37°。使用侧位头影测量X线片在特定解剖标志处测量水平面上的FST厚度,包括前额基部、鼻子、嘴唇和下巴。此外,评估唇长、下巴突出度和角度倾斜度。组间比较采用单因素方差分析,随后进行事后邦费罗尼检验。使用皮尔逊相关检验研究变量之间线性关系的强度。统计学显著性设定为p = 0.05。

结果

各组之间在面部软组织特征方面观察到显著差异。与低角个体(第1组)相比,高角个体(第4组)的总面部高度(TFH)、下部面部高度(LFH)以及上下唇长度显著增加(p<0.001)。第4组在下巴处(Gn - Gn'和Me - Me')的软组织也更薄(p<0.001)。第4组的颏沟更浅,下巴角度更钝。在下巴伸展和喉角方面存在性别差异。在MP/SN与各种软组织测量值之间发现了正相关,包括唇长和下巴突出度。在上面部,四组在长度和角度测量方面均未观察到统计学上的显著差异。

结论

垂直面部差异显著影响软组织特征,尤其是在面部的下三分之一。高角个体表现出唇长增加和下巴厚度减小。不同差异组之间的鼻长和突出度没有差异。这些发现对正畸治疗计划具有临床意义,强调了基于垂直面部模式采取个性化方法的必要性。

相似文献

1
Comparisons of facial soft tissue characteristics in adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns.成年患者不同下颌偏斜模式下面部软组织特征的比较。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Apr 29;25(1):660. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06054-7.
2
[Soft and hard tissue changes of hyperdivergent class Ⅱ patients before and after orthodontic extraction treatment].[高角Ⅱ类患者正畸拔牙治疗前后的软硬组织变化]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2024 Feb 18;56(1):111-119. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2024.01.018.
3
Comparisons of soft tissue chin thickness in adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns.成年患者不同下颌偏斜模式下软组织颏部厚度的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jul;84(4):708-14. doi: 10.2319/062613-474.1. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
4
Comparative Evaluation of Soft Tissue Chin Thickness in Adult Patients with Skeletal Class II Malocclusion with Various Vertical Growth Patterns: a Cephalometric Study.骨性Ⅱ类错(牙合)患者软组织颏厚度的比较评估:一项头影测量研究。
Folia Med (Plovdiv). 2021 Feb 28;63(1):74-80. doi: 10.3897/folmed.63.e52165.
5
Longitudinal study of cephalometric soft tissue profile traits between the ages of 6 and 18 years.6 至 18 岁期间头影测量软组织侧貌特征的纵向研究。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jan;84(1):48-55. doi: 10.2319/041513-291.1. Epub 2013 Jul 8.
6
Photometric analysis of esthetically pleasant and unpleasant facial profile.美观与不美观面部轮廓的光度分析。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2014 Mar-Apr;19(2):66-75. doi: 10.1590/2176-9451.19.2.066-075.oar.
7
The influence of mandibular divergence on facial soft tissue thickness in class I patients: a cephalometric study.下颌骨分角对 I 类错牙合患者面部软组织厚度的影响:一项头影测量研究。
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2022;81(2):472-480. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2021.0029. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
8
Comparison Of Soft Tissue Chin And Lower Lip Thickness In Adult Patients With Various Mandibular Divergence Patterns.不同下颌骨偏斜模式成年患者的软组织颏部和下唇厚度比较。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2023 Apr-Jun;35(2):226-230. doi: 10.55519/JAMC-02-10491.
9
Three-dimensional evaluation of soft tissue change gradients after mandibular setback surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion.骨性 III 类错颌下颌后退术后软组织变化梯度的三维评价。
Angle Orthod. 2010 Sep;80(5):896-903. doi: 10.2319/021210-90.1.
10
Perioral soft tissue evaluation of skeletal Class II Division 1: A lateral cephalometric study.骨性安氏II类1分类错牙合患者口周软组织的评价:一项头影测量研究
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Sep;148(3):405-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.03.033.

引用本文的文献

1
Anterior Tooth Inclination Between Skeletal Class II and III Malocclusions After Surgical Orthodontic Treatment.外科正畸治疗后骨性II类与III类错牙合畸形之间的前牙倾斜度
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jun 18;15(12):1553. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15121553.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of the soft tissue facial profile in different skeletal malocclusions in relation to age.评估不同骨骼畸形错颌患者软组织侧貌与年龄的关系。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Jun 20;24(1):711. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-04486-1.
2
Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Differences among Three Skeletal Classes in Korean Population Using CBCT.基于 CBCT 的韩国人群三种颅面骨骼类型的面部软组织厚度差异
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Feb 1;20(3):2658. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20032658.
3
The influence of mandibular divergence on facial soft tissue thickness in class I patients: a cephalometric study.
下颌骨分角对 I 类错牙合患者面部软组织厚度的影响:一项头影测量研究。
Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2022;81(2):472-480. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2021.0029. Epub 2021 Mar 29.
4
Assessment of Facial Soft Tissue Dimensions in Adult Patients with Different Sagittal Skeletal Classes using Cone beam Computed Tomography.使用锥形束计算机断层扫描评估不同矢状骨面型成年患者的面部软组织尺寸
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016 Jul 1;17(7):542-8.
5
Facial Soft Tissue Thickness Among Three Skeletal Classes in Adult Pakistani Subjects.成年巴基斯坦受试者三种骨骼类型的面部软组织厚度
J Forensic Sci. 2015 Nov;60(6):1420-5. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.12851. Epub 2015 Aug 11.
6
Facial soft tissue thickness differences among three skeletal classes in Japanese population.日本人群中三种骨骼类型的面部软组织厚度差异。
Forensic Sci Int. 2014 Mar;236:175-80. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2013.12.040. Epub 2014 Jan 11.
7
Comparisons of soft tissue chin thickness in adult patients with various mandibular divergence patterns.成年患者不同下颌偏斜模式下软组织颏部厚度的比较。
Angle Orthod. 2014 Jul;84(4):708-14. doi: 10.2319/062613-474.1. Epub 2013 Nov 4.
8
Facial soft tissue thickness among skeletal malocclusions: is there a difference?骨性错牙合畸形患者面部软组织厚度:是否存在差异?
Korean J Orthod. 2012 Feb;42(1):23-31. doi: 10.4041/kjod.2012.42.1.23. Epub 2012 Feb 27.
9
Facial soft tissue thickness in individuals with different occlusion patterns in adult Turkish subjects.成年土耳其受试者中不同咬合模式个体的面部软组织厚度
Homo. 2011 Aug;62(4):288-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jchb.2011.06.001. Epub 2011 Jul 13.
10
Facial soft tissue thickness in Japanese children.日本儿童的面部软组织厚度。
Forensic Sci Int. 2010 Jun 15;199(1-3):109.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.02.016. Epub 2010 Mar 26.