Kannegieter Ewan, Nazir Kaser, Nancarrow Susan A, Borthwick Alan M
Frank H Netter MD School of Medicine, Quinnipiac University, Hamden, Connecticut, USA.
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK.
J Foot Ankle Res. 2025 Jun;18(2):e70048. doi: 10.1002/jfa2.70048.
Interprofessional conflict has long characterised the relationship between UK podiatric surgeons and orthopaedic surgeons, stemming from overlapping professional boundaries and differing regulatory frameworks. This commentary focuses upon the recent memorandum of understanding (MoU) between the Royal College of Podiatry (RCPod) and the British Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (BOFAS), which aims to address key areas of agreement and disagreement while fostering collaboration. It provides a contextual backdrop by illuminating the historical interprofessional conflict preceding the MoU and highlights the potential of the MoU to enhance patient outcomes, improve workforce sustainability and bridge historical divides. It is clear that achieving lasting progress will require continued dialogue and mutual recognition of each profession's contributions to modern healthcare. These issues also hold broader relevance for interprofessional relations and healthcare policy worldwide.
长期以来,跨专业冲突一直是英国足病外科医生和骨科医生之间关系的特征,这源于专业界限的重叠和不同的监管框架。本评论聚焦于皇家足病医学院(RCPod)和英国足踝骨科协会(BOFAS)最近达成的谅解备忘录(MoU),该备忘录旨在解决双方达成一致和存在分歧的关键领域,同时促进合作。通过阐明谅解备忘录之前的历史跨专业冲突,为其提供了背景,并强调了谅解备忘录在改善患者治疗效果、提高劳动力可持续性以及弥合历史分歧方面的潜力。显然,要取得持久进展,需要持续对话以及相互认可各专业对现代医疗保健的贡献。这些问题对全球跨专业关系和医疗政策也具有更广泛的相关性。