Suppr超能文献

医疗保健中争议的专业角色边界:文献系统综述。

Contested professional role boundaries in health care: a systematic review of the literature.

机构信息

School of Health and Human Sciences, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW 2480 Gold Coast, Australia.

Centre for Innovation and Leadership in Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ England.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Res. 2015 Feb 5;8(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13047-015-0061-1. eCollection 2015.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Across the Western world, demographic changes have led to healthcare policy trends in the direction of role flexibility, challenging established role boundaries and professional hierarchies. Population ageing is known to be associated with a rise in prevalence of chronic illnesses which, coupled with a reducing workforce, now places much greater demands on healthcare provision. Role flexibility within the health professions has been identified as one of the key innovative practice developments which may mitigate the effects of these demographic changes and help to ensure a sustainable health provision into the future. However, it is clear that policy drives to encourage and enable greater role flexibility among the health professions may also lead to professional resistance and inter-professional role boundary disputes. In the foot and ankle arena, this has been evident in areas such as podiatric surgery, podiatrist prescribing and extended practice in diabetes care, but it is far from unique to podiatry.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature identifying examples of disputed role boundaries in health professions was undertaken, utilising the STARLITE framework and adopting a focus on the specific characteristics and outcomes of boundary disputes. Synthesis of the data was undertaken via template analysis, employing a thematic organisation and structure.

RESULTS

The review highlights the range of role boundary disputes across the health professions, and a commonality of events preceding each dispute. It was notable that relatively few disputes were resolved through recourse to legal or regulatory mandates.

CONCLUSIONS

Whilst there are a number of different strategies underpinning boundary disputes, some common characteristics can be identified and related to existing theory. Importantly, horizontal substitution invokes more overt role boundary disputes than other forms, with less resolution, and with clear implications for professions working within the foot and ankle arena.

摘要

背景

在整个西方世界,人口结构的变化导致医疗政策朝着角色灵活性的方向发展,挑战了既定的角色界限和专业等级制度。众所周知,人口老龄化与慢性病患病率的上升有关,加上劳动力减少,现在对医疗服务的需求大大增加。卫生专业人员的角色灵活性已被确定为关键的创新实践发展之一,这可能有助于缓解这些人口变化的影响,并有助于确保未来可持续的医疗服务。然而,很明显,鼓励和使卫生专业人员之间更具灵活性的政策驱动力也可能导致专业人员的抵制和跨专业角色边界争端。在足部和踝关节领域,这种情况在足病手术、足病医生处方和糖尿病护理的扩展实践等领域已经很明显,但远非足病学所独有。

方法

利用 STARLITE 框架,对文献进行系统综述,确定卫生专业人员中存在争议的角色边界的例子,并关注边界争端的具体特征和结果。通过模板分析对数据进行综合,采用主题组织和结构。

结果

综述突出了跨卫生专业人员的一系列角色边界争端,以及每个争端之前的共同事件。值得注意的是,相对较少的争端通过诉诸法律或监管命令来解决。

结论

尽管存在许多不同的策略来支持边界争端,但可以确定一些共同的特征,并与现有理论相关联。重要的是,水平替代会引发比其他形式更明显的角色边界争端,解决的机会更少,并且对在足部和踝关节领域工作的专业人员有明确的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad1/4322807/566a0f8eb0fb/13047_2015_61_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验