Hohenforst-Schmidt Wolfgang, Xu Ying, Greeven Julia, Langereis Sander, Huang Haidong, Liu Jian, Yao Xiaopeng, Shen Xiaping, Yang Yang, Wu Liangquan, Zarogoulidis Paul, Petousis Stamatis, Margioula-Siarkou Chrysoula, Petridis Dimitris, Steinheimer Michael, Riedel Andreas, Aboobaker Noufal, Karamitrousis Evaggelos, Perdikouri Eleni-Isidora, Vagionas Anastasios, Vogl Thomas, Sinha Anil
Thorax Centre Südwestfalen, Märkische Kliniken, ''Lüdenscheid'' Clinics, aff. University of Bonn and Private University of Hamburg, Germany.
Sana Clinic Group Franken, Department of Cardiology / Pulmonology / Intensive Care / Nephrology, 'Hof'' Clinics, University of Erlangen, Hof, Germany.
J Cancer. 2025 Mar 21;16(7):2124-2144. doi: 10.7150/jca.109996. eCollection 2025.
We used CBCT application as one-stop-shop nodule orientated approach in regards to increase DY, reduce complication rate, reduce time on-table and economical costs with classical peripheral instruments including mini-cryoprobe (ERBE 1,1mm), rEBUS (Olympus) and standard RUFBs (Olympus Company) with at least 2mm working channel and 4,2mm outer diameter for the diagnosis of peripheral targets (iSPNs) in a prospective all-comers registry after detailed analysis of pre-interventional CT for vessel- and bronchus sign classes. From Jun 2017 until Nov 2019 in 90 all-comers patients between 16 and 95 years fit for bronchoscopy with 101 peripheral lesions in a daily routine scheme after informed consent about this prospective registry were included. For histological proven benign disease in any lesion patients had to adhere FU according radiological guidelines and further on by re-visits for at least 2 years after biopsy resulting into last visit in Feb 2022 without any drop-out. Present HRCT was mandatory to achieve one day before intervention. It had to be decided by the examiner mainly after analysis of the preset HRCT which of the 3 CBCT driven modalities were used for diagnostical approach: A) Pure endobronchial approach (CBCT, rEBUS, TBB), B) Pure transthoracical approach with a 21G core-biopsy needle (BIOPINCE needle) with CBCT only, or C) Combined approach as described below (CBCT, rEBUS, TTNA). As instruments were available common forceps and needles, EWC, curette and various RUFB (Olympus Company) mentioned in the materials section. A second CBCT was only allowed in the combined approach group to plan the 3D transthoracic approach in expiration whereas even a CBCT for tool-in-lesion control (TIL CBCT) was never allowed in all 3 groups. In 100 lesions predefined modalities pure endobiopsy, pure TTNA and combined approaches were performed in 77, 9 and 14 lesions respectively without any pneumothorax or bleeding. In these 3 modalities we found confirmed (mostly specific) benign and malignant cases 47 and 30, 4 and 5, 2 and 12 respectively. Lesion sizes in the 3 different groups were (median, mean) 14 and 17,7mm (of those 41 invisible of 77 under XR (53%) in the pure endobiopsy group), 27 and 31mm (11% invisible under XR in the pure TTNA group), 18,5 and 23mm (35% invisible under XR in the combined group) respectively. In the 3 groups for the malignant cases 25 of 30, 5 of 5 and 12 of 12 were diagnosed correctly rendering a diagnostical yield of 42 in 47 malignant cases for the whole algorithm (89,4%) with sizes (mean, median) for the whole algorithm of 16 and 19,7mm respectively which is comparable to published data for robotic-assisted bronchoscopy yield. In regards to vessel sign analysis it has to be clearly stated that the significance level for outcome prediction is inferior to bronchus sign analysis. In multivariate analysis there was a clear tendency towards higher outcome prediction especially if a pulmonary artery branch leads into such target even when a bronchus sign is missing. For NY when comparing univariate analysis and partition model analysis at a set diameter of >11mm with significance (p=0,0052) the additional advantage of analysing a given vessel sign (especially pulmonary artery branches) seems to add on 19% of valuable outcome prediction. A nodule orientated approach in a manual CBCT-AF environment including typical instruments renders in experienced hands comparable results to robotic assisted bronchoscopy even without UTN bronchoscopes or other specialized, therefore expensive tools. In multivariate analysis only bronchus sign analysis revealed significant (p = 0,05) prediction of navigational yield outcome prediction whereas vessel sign analysis increases highly the odds ratio in favor of positive outcome prediction but without significance at the given level. In a partition model to erase outliers at a set iSPN diameter >11mm vessel sign analysis (especially pulmonary artery branches) renders a significant and ameliorated prediction of NY.
我们采用CBCT应用作为以结节为导向的一站式方法,以提高诊断率(DY)、降低并发症发生率、减少手术时间和经济成本,使用的传统周边器械包括微型冷冻探头(ERBE 1.1mm)、径向超声支气管镜(rEBUS,奥林巴斯)和标准径向超声引导下经支气管肺活检针(RUFBs,奥林巴斯公司),工作通道至少2mm,外径4.2mm,用于在对介入前CT进行血管和支气管征分类的详细分析后,对前瞻性纳入的所有患者的外周目标(iSPN)进行诊断。从2017年6月至2019年11月,在90例年龄在16至95岁适合支气管镜检查的所有患者中,在获得关于该前瞻性登记的知情同意后,按照日常方案纳入了101个外周病变。对于任何病变中经组织学证实为良性疾病的患者,必须按照放射学指南进行随访,并在活检后至少2年进行复查,直至2022年2月最后一次就诊,期间无任何失访。干预前一天必须进行当前的高分辨率CT(HRCT)检查。检查者主要在分析预设的HRCT后决定使用三种CBCT驱动模式中的哪一种进行诊断:A)单纯支气管内方法(CBCT、rEBUS、经支气管活检);B)仅使用CBCT的21G芯针(BIOPINCE针)的单纯经胸方法;或C)如下所述的联合方法(CBCT、rEBUS、经胸针吸活检)。材料部分提到的常用器械有钳子、针、电子支气管镜、刮匙和各种径向超声引导下经支气管肺活检针(奥林巴斯公司)。仅在联合方法组中允许进行第二次CBCT以计划呼气时的三维经胸方法,而在所有三组中均不允许进行用于病变内器械控制的CBCT(TIL CBCT)。在100个病变中,分别对77个、9个和14个病变进行了预定义模式的单纯经支气管活检、单纯经胸针吸活检和联合方法,无任何气胸或出血。在这三种模式中,我们分别发现确诊(大多为特异性)的良性和恶性病例为47例和30例、4例和5例、2例和12例。三个不同组中的病变大小(中位数、平均值)分别为14和17.7mm(单纯经支气管活检组中77个病变中有41个在X线下不可见(53%))、27和31mm(单纯经胸针吸活检组中11%在X线下不可见)、18.5和23mm(联合组中35%在X线下不可见)。在三组恶性病例中,30例中的25例、5例中的5例和12例中的12例被正确诊断,整个算法在47例恶性病例中的诊断率为42例(89.4%),整个算法的大小(平均值、中位数)分别为16和19.7mm,这与已发表的机器人辅助支气管镜检查诊断率数据相当。关于血管征分析,必须明确指出,结果预测的显著性水平低于支气管征分析。在多变量分析中,尤其是当肺动脉分支通向该目标时,即使没有支气管征,也有明显的更高结果预测趋势。对于结节大小(NY),在设定直径>11mm且具有显著性(p = 0.0052)时,比较单变量分析和分区模型分析,分析特定血管征(尤其是肺动脉分支)的额外优势似乎增加了19%的有价值结果预测。在手动CBCT-AF环境中包括典型器械的以结节为导向的方法,即使没有超声支气管镜或其他专门的、因此昂贵的工具,在经验丰富的手中也能产生与机器人辅助支气管镜检查相当的结果。在多变量分析中,只有支气管征分析显示对导航诊断率结果预测有显著(p = 0.05)作用,而血管征分析显著增加了有利于阳性结果预测的优势比,但在给定水平上无显著性。在一个分区模型中,为了消除设定的iSPN直径>11mm时的数据异常值,血管征分析(尤其是肺动脉分支)对结节大小(NY)有显著且改善了的预测作用。