Bonney Peter J, Malladi Sasidhar, Ssematimba Amos, O'Hara Kathleen C, Remmenga Marta D, Farr Michelle, Leonard Mickey, Alexander Catherine Y, Blair Benjamin, Martin Sylvia Wanzala, Culhane Marie R, Corzo Cesar A
Secure Food Systems Team University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108, USA.
Department of Mathematics Faculty of Science Gulu University, Gulu, Uganda.
Transbound Emerg Dis. 2024 Jul 15;2024:6657600. doi: 10.1155/2024/6657600. eCollection 2024.
Movement restrictions are a critical component of response plans for an African swine fever (ASF) outbreak in the United States. These restrictions are likely to include requiring permits to move animals and products within, into, and out of 5-km control areas (CAs) established around confirmed positive farms. For quarantined finishing farms located within a CA, diagnostic testing is an expected criterion for receival of a permit to move pigs to a harvest facility or removal of quarantine. A stochastic disease transmission and active surveillance model were used to evaluate premovement active surveillance protocols varying by the number of samples and timing of sample collection before movement. Surveillance protocol scenarios were evaluated for several different sampling prioritization schemes; virus strains of medium or high virulence; barn sizes of 1,200, 2,400, and 4,800 pigs; and farms with average to high mortality and morbidity during routine production. Surveillance protocols that included prioritization schemes targeting dead pigs and pigs with clinical signs resulted in the highest probabilities of detection and the lowest numbers of infectious pigs at the time of movement in barns that went undetected. There was some evidence that targeting sick pigs prior to dead pigs may be more effective for moderately virulent strains. However, in most scenarios, including all highly virulent strain scenarios and moderately virulent strain scenarios in barn sizes of 1,200 with average farm performance, prioritization of dead versus sick pigs first did not have a large impact on the predicted outcomes. Increasing sample sizes improved outcomes, though only marginal gains were achieved once the available dead and sick were sampled. Predicted outcomes may be further improved by sampling the available dead and sick pigs in a barn across multiple days, though the associated increase in the probability of detection was minor.
行动限制是美国非洲猪瘟(ASF)疫情应对计划的关键组成部分。这些限制可能包括要求在确诊阳性农场周围设立的5公里控制区(CA)内、进入和离开该区域时,移动动物和产品需要许可证。对于位于控制区内的隔离育肥场,诊断检测是获得将猪转移至屠宰设施或解除隔离许可的预期标准。使用随机疾病传播和主动监测模型来评估移动前主动监测方案,这些方案因移动前采样数量和采样时间不同而有所差异。针对几种不同的采样优先级方案、中等或高毒力病毒株、存栏量为1200头、2400头和4800头猪的猪舍,以及在常规生产期间死亡率和发病率处于平均水平至高的农场,对监测方案场景进行了评估。包括针对死猪和有临床症状猪的优先级方案的监测方案,在未被检测到的猪舍中,移动时的检测概率最高,感染猪数量最少。有证据表明,对于中等毒力毒株,先针对病猪进行检测可能更有效。然而,在大多数情况下,包括所有高毒力毒株情况以及存栏量为1200头、农场表现平均的中等毒力毒株情况下,先对死猪还是病猪进行优先级排序对预测结果影响不大。增加样本量可改善结果,不过一旦对现有的死猪和病猪进行采样,收益仅为边际增加。通过在多天内对猪舍中的现有死猪和病猪进行采样,预测结果可能会进一步改善,尽管检测概率的相关增加幅度较小。