• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥法木单抗治疗阿联酋复发型多发性硬化症的成本效益

Cost-effectiveness of ofatumumab for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis in the United Arab Emirates.

作者信息

Inshasi Jihad, Nowier Yomna, Zimovetz Evelina A, Moussa Ahmed, Shatila Ahmed, Hassan Ali, Farghaly Mohamed, Thakre Mona, Shakra Mustafa, Dallal Sara Al, Noori Suzan I A, Alabdin Tayseer Zain, Khattab Sherouq, Yamout Bassem

机构信息

Neurology Department, Rashid Hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates.

Dubai Medical College, Dubai Academic Health Corporation, United Arab Emirates.

出版信息

Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2025 Apr 28;18:17562864251330260. doi: 10.1177/17562864251330260. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1177/17562864251330260
PMID:40303316
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12038200/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an autoimmune disease of the central nervous system, associated with demyelination and inflammation. Relapsing forms of MS (RMS) encompass all patients with MS experiencing relapses. While there is currently no cure for MS, the introduction of several disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) has significantly reduced the risk of relapse and disability in patients with MS. There is a high unmet need for an easy-to-administer DMT that can be used early in the treatment pathway.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ofatumumab compared with other commonly used DMTs for the treatment of RMS from a health payer perspective in the United Arab Emirates (UAE).

DESIGN

A cost-effectiveness analysis.

METHODS

A Markov model, based on expanded disability status scale (EDSS) health states, was developed using the UAE payer's perspective and a 65-year time horizon. The baseline patient distribution across the EDSS states was aligned to the population of ASCLEPIOS I and II trials. The British Columbia database informed natural history transition probabilities. Treatment effects were applied by delaying disability progression and reducing the number of relapses and were sourced from a network meta-analysis. The health care resource utilization was derived from interviews with local experts, who also validated the model structure and comparators, and utility inputs from published studies. In the absence of an officially defined willingness-to-pay threshold in the UAE, it was assumed to be United Arab Emirates Dirham (AED) 369,854 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY), which is twice the UAE gross domestic product per capita.

RESULTS

Base-case results indicated that ofatumumab was dominant over ocrelizumab, dimethyl fumarate, fingolimod, and natalizumab intravenous; was more cost-effective compared with teriflunomide, fingolimod (generic), glatiramer acetate, interferons, and best supportive care; and resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of AED 713,068 per QALY versus cladribine. Sensitivity analyses were in line with the results of the base-case analysis.

CONCLUSION

From the UAE payer's perspective, ofatumumab could be a cost-effective treatment alternative for patients with RMS.

摘要

背景

多发性硬化症(MS)是一种中枢神经系统的自身免疫性疾病,与脱髓鞘和炎症相关。复发型多发性硬化症(RMS)包括所有经历复发的MS患者。虽然目前MS无法治愈,但几种疾病修正疗法(DMTs)的引入显著降低了MS患者复发和残疾的风险。对于一种易于给药且可在治疗早期使用的DMT存在高度未满足的需求。

目的

本研究旨在从阿联酋(UAE)医疗支付方的角度评估奥法妥木单抗与其他常用DMTs治疗RMS的成本效益。

设计

成本效益分析。

方法

基于扩展残疾状态量表(EDSS)健康状态开发了一个马尔可夫模型,采用阿联酋支付方的视角和65年的时间范围。EDSS状态下的基线患者分布与ASCLEPIOS I和II试验的人群一致。不列颠哥伦比亚数据库提供自然史转变概率。通过延迟残疾进展和减少复发来应用治疗效果,这些数据来自网络荟萃分析。医疗资源利用情况来自对当地专家的访谈,专家们还验证了模型结构和对照物,以及已发表研究中的效用输入。在阿联酋没有官方定义的支付意愿阈值的情况下,假定为每质量调整生命年(QALY)369,854阿联酋迪拉姆(AED),这是阿联酋人均国内生产总值的两倍。

结果

基础病例结果表明,奥法妥木单抗优于奥瑞珠单抗、富马酸二甲酯、芬戈莫德和静脉注射那他珠单抗;与特立氟胺、芬戈莫德(非专利药)、醋酸格拉替雷、干扰素和最佳支持治疗相比,成本效益更高;与克拉屈滨相比,每QALY的增量成本效益比为713,068 AED。敏感性分析与基础病例分析结果一致。

结论

从阿联酋支付方的角度来看,奥法妥木单抗可能是RMS患者具有成本效益的治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d7/12038200/88a0edb23441/10.1177_17562864251330260-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d7/12038200/88a0edb23441/10.1177_17562864251330260-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b1d7/12038200/88a0edb23441/10.1177_17562864251330260-fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of ofatumumab for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis in the United Arab Emirates.奥法木单抗治疗阿联酋复发型多发性硬化症的成本效益
Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2025 Apr 28;18:17562864251330260. doi: 10.1177/17562864251330260. eCollection 2025.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ofatumumab for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Canada.奥法木单抗治疗加拿大复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益分析。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 Nov;6(6):859-870. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00363-1. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
3
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis: A 10-Year Markov Model.奥法妥木单抗与特立氟胺治疗复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益分析:一项10年马尔可夫模型研究
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2025 Mar 20;17:217-232. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S503842. eCollection 2025.
4
Cost-utility of First-line Disease-modifying Treatments for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis.复发缓解型多发性硬化症一线疾病修正治疗的成本效益
Clin Ther. 2017 Mar;39(3):537-557.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.01.028. Epub 2017 Feb 14.
5
Cost-Effectiveness of Alemtuzumab in the Treatment of Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis in the United States.在美国,用阿仑单抗治疗多发性硬化症复发型的成本效益分析。
Value Health. 2019 Feb;22(2):168-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.08.011. Epub 2018 Dec 6.
6
Evaluating the impact of early vs delayed ofatumumab initiation and estimating the long-term outcomes of ofatumumab vs teriflunomide in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients in Spain.评估在西班牙复发型多发性硬化症患者中,早期与延迟使用奥法妥木单抗的影响,并估计奥法妥木单抗与特立氟胺的长期疗效。
J Med Econ. 2023 Jan-Dec;26(1):11-18. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2022.2151270.
7
Cost-effectiveness of delayed-release dimethyl fumarate for the treatment of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis in the United States.美国迟释型富马酸二甲酯治疗复发型多发性硬化症的成本效益
J Med Econ. 2016;19(4):432-42. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2015.1135805. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
8
Cost-effectiveness of cladribine tablets, alemtuzumab, and natalizumab in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis with high disease activity in England.在英国,克拉屈滨片、阿仑单抗和那他珠单抗治疗疾病活动度高的复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益。
J Med Econ. 2018 Jul;21(7):676-686. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2018.1461630. Epub 2018 Apr 16.
9
Disease-Modifying Therapies for Relapsing-Remitting and Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Cost-Utility Analysis.复发缓解型和原发进展型多发性硬化症的疾病修正治疗:成本效用分析。
CNS Drugs. 2018 Dec;32(12):1145-1157. doi: 10.1007/s40263-018-0566-9.
10
Cost-effectiveness analyses of natalizumab (Tysabri) compared with other disease-modifying therapies for people with highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the UK.在英国,将那他珠单抗(泰萨比)与其他改善病情疗法用于高度活动性复发缓解型多发性硬化症患者的成本效益分析。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(7):617-27. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826070-00008.

本文引用的文献

1
Societal economic burden of multiple sclerosis and cost-effectiveness of disease-modifying therapies.多发性硬化症的社会经济负担及疾病修正疗法的成本效益
Front Neurol. 2022 Oct 20;13:1015256. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1015256. eCollection 2022.
2
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Ofatumumab for the Treatment of Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis in Canada.奥法木单抗治疗加拿大复发缓解型多发性硬化症的成本效益分析。
Pharmacoecon Open. 2022 Nov;6(6):859-870. doi: 10.1007/s41669-022-00363-1. Epub 2022 Sep 15.
3
Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of 360 Disease-Modifying Treatment Escalation Sequences in Multiple Sclerosis.
360 种疾病修饰治疗升级方案在多发性硬化症中的有效性和成本效益。
Value Health. 2022 Jun;25(6):984-991. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1363. Epub 2021 Dec 15.
4
Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 (CHEERS 2022) Statement: Updated Reporting Guidance for Health Economic Evaluations.《2022 年健康经济评估报告标准》(CHEERS 2022)声明:健康经济评估报告的更新指南。
Value Health. 2022 Jan;25(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2021.11.1351.
5
Ofatumumab: A Review in Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis.奥法妥木单抗:治疗多发性硬化症复发型的研究进展。
Drugs. 2022 Jan;82(1):55-62. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01650-7.
6
How have Economic Evaluations in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Evolved Over Time? A Systematic Literature Review.复发型多发性硬化症的经济学评估如何随时间演变?一项系统文献综述。
Neurol Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):557-583. doi: 10.1007/s40120-021-00264-1. Epub 2021 Jul 19.
7
Comparison of ofatumumab and other disease-modifying therapies for relapsing multiple sclerosis: a network meta-analysis.比较奥法妥木单抗和其他疾病修正疗法治疗复发型多发性硬化症:一项网络荟萃分析。
J Comp Eff Res. 2020 Dec;9(18):1255-1274. doi: 10.2217/cer-2020-0122. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
8
Ofatumumab versus Teriflunomide in Multiple Sclerosis.奥法妥木单抗与特立氟胺治疗多发性硬化症的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Aug 6;383(6):546-557. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1917246.
9
Disease-Modifying Drugs and Family Planning in People with Multiple Sclerosis: A Consensus Narrative Review from the Gulf Region.多发性硬化症患者的疾病修正药物与计划生育:来自海湾地区的共识性叙述综述
Neurol Ther. 2020 Dec;9(2):265-280. doi: 10.1007/s40120-020-00201-8. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
10
Consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple sclerosis: 2019 revisions to the MENACTRIMS guidelines.多发性硬化症诊断与治疗的共识建议:2019 年 MENACTRIMS 指南修订版。
Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2020 Jan;37:101459. doi: 10.1016/j.msard.2019.101459. Epub 2019 Oct 18.